Visit ArabTopics.com

Results of the First Round of Talks Between the USA and the Taliban

24f72a69767d4c178aeba91e8512b64e_18

January 2019 saw the conclusion of the first round of talks between the USA and the Taliban, which took place in Qatar. The Afghan Taliban and the official representatives of the USA reached preliminary agreement on three key issues:

- the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan within 18 months;

- an exchange of prisoners;

- the lifting of the travel ban on Taliban leaders, and their removal from the UN’s blacklist.

In turn the Taliban agreed, among other things, not to allow terrorist organisations, including Al Qaeda and DAESH (an organisation prohibited in Russia) or any other armed grouping to carry out attacks on Afghan civilians or authorities, the USA, or any of its allies.

The second round of talks is scheduled for the end of February 2019. The USA and the Taliban plan to sign an official agreement on the above points. The agreement is expected to be fairly strict. The Taliban delegation will be headed by its lead negotiator, Abdul Ghani Baradar.

After the above steps have been completed (in 2021), Afghanistan will embark on an internal regulation process, which will involve two stages:

- the entry into effect of a general ceasefire between the opposing sides;

- the formation of a temporary government, to be elected for a term of three years: the Taliban will nominate its own representatives for election to this body;

- the Taliban propose a reform of the Afghan police, including local police authorities (which have been accused of being extremely corrupt and of intimidating the public).

The Taliban’s leaders have declared that they are renouncing their claim to exclusive power in Afghanistan and that they recognise that peace in Afghanistan needs to be an inclusive process. They also promise to seek ways to involve the Afghan government in the peace and reconciliation process, and also to act in conjunction with existing authorities (whereas, during the period of the so-called Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, from 1996-2001, they imposed a strict form of Sharia law).

The talks between the USA and the Taliban (December 2018- January 2019) are a small part of the larger Afghan dialogue process, which has, traditionally, involved four parties: the Taliban, the USA, the Afghan National Unity Government, and Pakistan.

In addition to the US troops and the armed opposition, made up of Taliban militants, there is a third party in the Afghan conflict: the Afghan national security forces, which seek to protect the country’s constitution and its head of state, President Ashraf Ghani.

But for the whole duration of the anti-terrorist campaign in Afghanistan, from 2001 to date, the Taliban have refused to take part in any direct talks with representatives of the National Unity Government, which they consider to be illegitimate. Ashraf Ghani has been highly critical of this stance, which has forced him and his government into the position of an onlooker, while the Taliban and the USA determine the country’s fate between them.

Washington has declared that its strategic goal, in its talks with the Taliban, is to get the Taliban and the Afghan National Unity Government to sit around the negotiating table together. In other words, to “force” the Taliban to accept the country’s Constitution and current state institutions. According to the White House, this process will take 18 months, and will be accompanied by the progressive withdrawal of US troops.

According to the White House’s roadmap, with the beginning of the dialogue, Afghanistan will enter into a new phase: an internal regulation process. Which raises the obvious question – will that process actually take place, and, if so, when, and under what circumstances? The Pushtuns are a hospitable race, but they keep their word. The lack of any direct dialogue between the Taliban and the National Unity Government will result in either an extension of the US military presence in Afghanistan, or the outbreak of a new civil war like that in the early 1990s.

The talks have also revealed certain specific characteristics relating to the armed opposition in today’s Afghanistan. In general, that opposition is made up of the Taliban. But there are other forces operating in the country, including militants from Al-Qaeda, DAESH, Uighur separatists from the Xinjiang region of China, militants from the Pakistani Taliban, and various armed groups from the Central Asian countries and the Caucasus. The Afghan Taliban, which dominates the armed opposition, has been able to persuade the Al-Qaeda militants to pledge their loyalty to the Taliban’s leader, Hibatullah Akhundzada. As a result, in recent years the Taliban has been reinforced by Al-Qaeda militants serving in its ranks. This helps to explain how the Taliban is now able to control 60% of the country’s territory and carry out almost daily attacks on Afghan security forces and government officials.

As for DAESH, its leaders remain subordinate to their Emir and refuse to accept the leadership of Hibatullah Akhundzada, which results in a split within the armed opposition in Afghanistan.

The fourth party in the dialogue process is Pakistan. As one of the organisers of the talks between the USA and the Taliban, Pakistan has received assurances from the Afghan Taliban that, in the future, the latter will cut its links with Pakistani Taliban militants based in Afghanistan, insurgents from the Pakistani province of Balochistan and the militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba, and that it will refrain from acting against Pakistan’s interests.

The talks between the USA and the Taliban demonstrate that the two parties are serious about bringing an end to the internecine conflict in Afghanistan. But it is also evident that all the parties are determined to stick to their initial positions. The parties exchange spoken declarations, but they show no will to take any constructive steps or even move towards a compromise.

Natalia Zamarayeva, Ph.D (History), Senior Research Fellow, Pakistan section, Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.

 

Source: 
New Eastern Outlook

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
WWI Hidden History 50
Grayzone Project 42
Pass Blue 116
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 14
John Pilger 412
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 2061
FEE 3825
Marine Le Pen 282
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 693
Mohamed Omar 294
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 39
Angry Foreigner 17
Fritte Fritzson 12
Teologiska rummet 32
Filosofiska rummet 87
Vetenskapsradion Historia 134
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 194
Les Crises 2263
Richard Falk 136
Ian Sinclair 88
SpinWatch 54
Counter Currents 7475
Kafila 403
Gail Malone 34
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 94
The Duran 8115
Vanessa Beeley 93
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 5229
Paul Craig Roberts 1370
News Junkie Post 55
Nomi Prins 26
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 4109
Sir Ken Robinson 20
Stephan Kinsella 76
Liberty Blitzkrieg 821
Sami Bedouin 62
Consortium News 2314
21 Century Wire 3188
Burning Blogger 309
Stephen Gowans 74
David D. Friedman 146
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1489
Tom Dispatch 451
Levant Report 17
The Saker 3777
The Barnes Review 496
John Friend 395
Psyche Truth 146
Jonathan Cook 135
New Eastern Outlook 3453
School Sucks Project 1751
Giza Death Star 1694
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 581
GMWatch 2009
Robert Faurisson 150
Espionage History Archive 34
Jay's Analysis 826
Le 4ème singe 88
Jacob Cohen 202
Agora Vox 12938
Cercle Des Volontaires 425
Panamza 1878
Fairewinds 105
Project Censored 785
Spy Culture 427
Conspiracy Archive 68
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 520
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 674
Independent Science News 70
The Anti Media 6029
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 272
The Mind renewed 218
Natural Society 2563
Yanis Varoufakis 876
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 79
Web of Debt 134
Porkins Policy Review 377
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 574
Libyan War Truth 300
DeadLine Live 1908
Kevin Ryan 62
BSNEWS 2005
Aaron Franz 205
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 121
Dr. Bruce Levine 126
Peter B Collins 1425
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 9966
Climate Audit 222
Donna Laframboise 389
Judith Curry 1084
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2142
Syria Report 76
Human Rights Investigation 90
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 10814
Laura Wells Solutions 38
Video Rebel's Blog 419
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 18868
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 2805
Northerntruthseeker 2168
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4681
AntiWar.com Blog 2836
AntiWar.com Original Content 6452
Corbett Report 2173
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1136
Webster Tarpley Website 1019

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public