IPCC

More stunning pictures of Al Gore’s mansion at link

By Willis Eschenbach | Watts Up With That? | September 27, 2013

Ok, it is now official: “The long-term climate model simulations show a trend in global-mean surface temperature from 1951 to 2012 that agrees with the observed trend (very high confidence). There are, however, differences between simulated and observed trends over periods as … Continue reading →

The unadorned truth was door number one. Cringe-worthy exaggeration was door number two. The IPCC made the wrong call.
.
The Financial Post (the business section of Canada’s National Post newspaper) has published a piece by me today, titled 9,000 Nobel Pretenders.

Scientific truth isn’t negotiated in the dead of night behind closed doors.

Since Monday, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been in a meeting. The purpose of that meeting is to take a document authored by scientists and ensure that its wording is palatable to the powers that be.

There are many reasons to distrust the UN’s climate panel. Let’s start with political meddling and authors linked to green lobby groups.
click for full article
I have an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal today. My concerns about the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) aren’t news to regular readers of this blog, but matters are unlikely to improve until this information reaches a wider audience.

There is much in the news about how IPCC will handle the growing discrepancy between models and observations – long an issue at skeptic blogs. According to BBC News, a Dutch participant says that “governments are demanding a clear explanation” of the discrepancy. On the other hand, Der Spiegel reports:

by Judith Curry If you had the opportunity to ask 5 critical questions for the IPCC, what would you ask? Mike McGrath of the BBC asks the following questions: 1.  The IPCC – weren’t they the ones who said the … Continue reading →

A fictional UN climate body exists in the minds of the gullible. And then there’s the real IPCC.

It may not be wise to judge a book by its cover, but it’s entirely appropriate to judge an organization by its leader.
click to read full article
The Australian news site, MercatorNet, has just published a piece by yours truly titled The UN’s Climate Change Chief Puts Politics First.

Rather than speaking truth to power, activists have been parroting claims by the establishment that the IPCC chairman is a Nobel Prize winner.