Greenpeace & the IPCC Report
Greenpeace says 95% certainty is the same as 100% certainty. Tell that to people who die on the operating table.
IPCC
2 Arctic Circle Fake Nobel Laureates
According to the agenda of an upcoming conference, three Nobel laureates will be participating. But only one of them is genuine.
Fixing the Facts 2
AR5 Second Order Draft (SOD) Figures 1.4 and 1.5 showed the discrepancy between observations and projections from previous assessment reports. SOD Figure 1.5 (see below as annotated) directly showed the discrepancy for AR4 without additional clutter from earlier assessment reports. Even though AR4 was the most recent and most relevant assessment report, SOD Figure 1.5 was simply deleted from the report.
Fake Nobel Laureate Steve Running
Like those sad souls who walk around with military medals they themselves didn't earn on their chests, a forestry professor continues to bask in undeserved glory.
IPCC: fit for its purpose?
The IPCC is showing typical signs of middle age, including weight gain, a growing rigidity of viewpoint, and overconfidence in its methods. It did a great job in the early days, but it’s become ritualized and bureaucratic, issuing big bulk … Continue reading →
What would the IPCC have written if there had been 12 years of rapid warming?
Climatologists now require 20 to 30 years to even consider any climatic trend: Is that really honest, or is it just very convenient?