Let’s talk about the resolution proposed at the security council by Russia- The resolution, according to msm and alt media, that had everything to do with Turkey. And yet Turkey wasn’t even mentioned. Not named. Not cited. Nadda, nothing! Gee, I would think if this was about Turkey, Turkey would have been specifically mentioned? So, what gives? In case you didn't know, the resolution was soundly rejected. Read all the way through and I think you'll understand whyThe resolution was about respecting Syria's sovereignty:TodaysZaman
“The Russian draft resolution didn't name Turkey”
“The Russian draft resolution didn't name Turkey” but it was clearly aimed at the Turkish government”
“The Russian draft resolution didn’t name Turkey” but it was clearly aimed at the Turkish government
If Russia didn't cite Turkey specifically, this resolution was NOT aimed at Turkey, alone. No matter how many times the alt or msm media imply this resolution targeted Turkey, the fact that Russia didn't cite Turkey specifically tells me this resolution cut a wider swathe syria360
The fact is the Russian draft resolution according to Maria Zakharova will include “demands to end any actions that undermine the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Syria that are at odds with UN Security Council resolution 2254"
“Earlier on Friday, the Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova announced on Friday that a draft resolution will include demands to end any actions that undermine the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Syria that are at odds with UN Security Council resolution 2254"
Russia plans to table a Security Council resolution demanding an end to actions that undermine Syria's sovereignty, ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said in a statement posted on the ministry's Internet site”The resolution was soundly rejected by all member of the security council
UN, February 20. /TASS/. UN Security Council members failed to reach consent on Russia-initiated draft resolution in support of Syria’s sovereignty, Venezuela’s permanent envoy to UN Rafael Ramirez stated in his Twitter account.
The Kremlin regrets the UN Security Council's refusal to support the Russian resolution on Syria, Kremlin press secretary Dmitry Peskov has said."All we can do is to express our regret that this draft resolution has not been supported," he told reporters.
I put the article linked below through translate- From Serbian to English. I believe this article gives us a better idea of who this resolution was aimed at:
Moscow in the UN Security Council has listed major US and British strikes against a sovereign state On a shortened list of flagrant violations of international law are among other things: the bombing in Yemen in 1946, the US invasion of Grenada (by the UN Security Council called gross violation of international law, and Ronald Regan to him, this assessment is not at all spoiled your appetite for breakfast), Libya and Nicaragua 1986, Panama in 1989, Yugoslavia in 1999, Iraq in 2003 and again in Libya in 2011 ...
Deputy Permanent Representative of Russia in the UN Security Council Petr ILJICEV: "The consequences of the last intervention in Libya and Syria, its amazing scale. These are the terrible suffering of the civilian population and the destruction of the cultural heritage of mankind, and the migrant crisis without precedent. It is obvious that the presumption own excellence entitles some countries that have long placed himself above the objectives and principles of the Charter of the UN " RUSSIA is the UN Security Council presented the "express review" the most flagrant violations of international law by the United States and Great Britain.The list, which includes events of the twentieth century to the present day, he read the First Deputy Permanent Representative of the RF in the world organization Petr Iljicev in response to the accusations against Moscow regarding the events in Ukraine and annexation of Crimea to Russia."Some delegations spoke about the violation of the principles of the UN Charter, groundlessly accusing it of Russia. To this fantasy not to create false impression, let me make one "express review" the most flagrant violations of international law, including the objectives and principles of the Charter of the United Nations in recent decades, especially because to them, apparently, a little forgotten, "- said the Russian diplomat the debate dedicated to the maintenance of international peace and security.Among other things, he referred to the British bombing Yemeni city Harib 1946, pointing out that the SB condemned these moves Resolution 188 "stressing that repression is incompatible with the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.""In 1983 the United States to invade Grenada. The General Assembly in its resolution 37/8 called facts SAD "gross violation of international law". Many probably know how to react to this document of the then US president (Ronald Reagan) that he was not at the news spoiled my appetite for breakfast "- reminded Iljicev.Iljicev recalled that the United States in 1986 launched an attack on Libya, and in 1989 introduced the Army in Panama. In both cases, this fact was condemned by the UN General Assembly, which of them amount to a violation of international law.The Russian diplomat pointed out that the violation of the UN Charter stated the International Court of Justice. "For example, in its first trial in the history of the case, the Corfu Channel 'in 1946, the court found that the United Kingdom violated the sovereignty of Albania. It is well known judgment in the case, Nicaragua against the United States' 1986. In it, the court directly pointed out that the US violated the sovereignty of Nicaragua and norms of non-interference in internal affairs and the lack of use of force "- said Iljicev.He said Russian deputy ambassador to the UN, "irresponsible attitude" the US and its allies under the Charter of the United Nations continued to degenerate and the bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999, and the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was followed by Libya, where "with the seemingly altruistic outside help fire broke out, destroying the country and leaving in its place desolation and chaos, "said the diplomat.In his words, "just such illegal interventions in the form of illegal air strikes or delivery of weapons to non-governmental armed formations," led to the rise of extremism in Syria, which in the end, "spawned the emergence and strengthening of such terrible phenomenon" as a terrorist organization Islamic State ."The consequences of the intervention in Libya and Syria, its amazing scale. These are the terrible suffering of the civilian population and the destruction of the cultural heritage of mankind, and the migrant crisis is unprecedented, "- said Iljicev.He pointed out that 70 years after the end of World War II the main principles that form the basis of a system of international relations "become an obstacle for some unpleasant and, as a result, are subject to different interpretations, or simply bypassed.""It is obvious that the presumption own excellence entitles some countries that have long placed himself above the objectives and principles of the UN Charter," - said the Russian diplomat, referring to the sad statement of US President Barack Obama on the "excellence" of the American nation.
The fact that not one nation was cited, and the resolution spoke generally of supporting Syria's sovereignty, while demanding an end to actions that undermine that sovereignty tells me this resolution was directed at several players in this situation.Which explains why the US, France and the UK (amongst others) promptly rejected the resolution
"Six members of the Council, including the United States, the UK and France, rejected the draft resolution in a closed-doors vote on Friday"