Today we will be reviewing the Trent Horn debate over natural theology. I will try to get to the other half of my note cards I didn’t get to explain as well as showing how the Trinity and the theophanic view of the natural order is precluded in Thomistic natural theology. We will go deeper […]
“While most of us are spending time on Netflix.. he is in his books, sharpening his mind… edifying Christians throughout the world. All for the veneration and glorification of our Triune God on the public stage.” 00:00:00 Introduction 00:05:00 Epistomological mistakes of the empiricists atheists 00:08:50 Bad argumentations and fallacies from atheists 00:17:52 Trancendental argument […]
Fr Dcn Ananias joins me for another debate review and reaction. Tonight we will cover a lesser known gem in the annals of debate, the Bahnsen – Tabash debate. Many have heard the classic Bahnsen / Stein debate, but the Tabash debate is also a telling lesson in how to effectively debate. We will […]
The post Bahnsen Debate – REVIEW & REACTION! Bahnsen Vs. Tabash – Fr Dcn / Jay Dyer appeared first on JaysAnalysis.com.
Join me as Dr. Josh Rasmussen and I discuss and compare classical theistic arguments, presuppositional and transcendental arguments, epistemology, and apologetics in general. In this long anticipated discussion, these two apologists will compare and contrast two paradigms and whether the evidentialist framework actually does what it intends to do logically. Indeed, many people come to […]
“In this stream I am joined by the man, the myth, the legend Jay Dyer to deconstruct Reformed Protestant Theology from an Eastern Orthodox paradigm and perspective. Make sure to check it out and let me know what you think. If you enjoy this production, feel compelled, or appreciate my other videos, please support me through my website (www.davidpatrickharry.com) or donate directly by PayPal. Any contribution would be greatly appreciated. ”
We often hear the same objections to TAG based on similar mistakes. A year ago I did a specific stream presenting TAG and why it holds up against TANG found here. I covered the supposed transcendental argument for the non-existence of God, but we saw this was based on a fallacious understanding of theological voluntarism. Today we will cover more common and simpler objections to TAG which are usually based on misunderstandings, fallacies and basic blunders.
Today we do a full analysis of the greatest debate of the 2oth century – the Bahnsen/Stein Debate. Hopefully we will cover the many misunderstandings that arise from various sectors concerning the transcendental argument, the nature of proofs and evidences, the compatibility of philosophy with Orthodoxy, and especially this form of argumentation, the word-concept fallacy, calvinism and much more. Part 2 of the other talk will be up later tomorrow or the day after.
Much anticipated live stream debate Thursday at 1 PM Central, and then archived. Nick Fuentes of America First Media and Jay Dyer of JaysAnalysis.com debate Rome Vs Orthodoxy.
Purchase my book Here.
