Stephan Lewandowsky

Peer review is not 'the foundation of the scientific process' as a NASA scientist claims. And climate scientists have no business telling the public where scientific arguments can and cannot be conducted.

By Don Aitkin | September 4, 2016 I came across the phrase in the title, and followed a link to a recent journal article which for once was available on open access. Entitled ‘Science and the Public: Debate, Denial, and Skepticism’,  it looked interesting. You can read it here. The four authors come from different fields, and propose to […]

Academics insist that peer-reviewed research is sound and that everything else is inferior. But scholarly journals are actually littered with muck.