NIST

14 ways official reports agreed with “conspiracy theorists” on 9/11

As part of our season marking the 20th anniversary of the 9/11 “terrorist attacks”, OffG is going to be highlighting some of the research papers and scientific studies done over the years. These studies have been key in pointing out logical flaws and impossible physics used to support the official narrative. Our first paper is …

David Chandler on ‘Seven’

Widely-respected voice of the 9/11 Truth Movement, strong critic of the official accounts of the 9/11 collapses, David Chandler talks about ‘Seven’, the new documentary released by ae911truth.org, dealing with the recent findings of Dr. Leroy Hulsey of the University of Alaska Fairbanks relating to the likely cause of WTC7’s mysterious and unprecedented collapse. In …

Good Science vs Bad Science and Propaganda: A review of Seven

Dr Piers Robinson Among the many controversies surrounding the events of 9/11 one of the most prominent has been the question of how, many hours after the collapse of the Twin Towers, the 47-storey WTC7 building suffered a total collapse, all in a matter of seconds. The persistence of this controversy is hardly surprising. WTC7 …

University of Alaska Study Shows Fire Was Not the Cause of the Collapse of the World Trade Center Building 7

The university simulated the destruction of building 7 exactly as was done by NIST, but could not get the same results. The engineers concluded that every column in the whole building had to fail at the same time to replicate the collapse, and this would be impossible unless they were destroyed by planted explosives.

Why did John Gross claim he had no evidence of high temps in the WTC rubble?

OffGuardian | October 1, 2016 Underground it was still so hot that molten metal dripped down the walls… Ken Holden, director NY Dept of Design & Construction, excerpted in video above This video shows John Gross, a NIST engineer who played a central role in the investigation of the WTC collapses, claiming he has seen […]

NIST finally admits free fall of WTC7

OffGuardian David Chandler, physics teacher and member of AE9/11 Truth describes the journey toward NIST’s public admission that their initial calculations were incorrect and that WTC7’s first eight floors did descend at free-fall speed. This concession by NIST (see section 11) raises many additional questions about the plausibility of the fire-induced progressive failure explanation for […]

Physicists Say Twin Towers Destroyed by Controlled Demolition on 9/11

(ANTIMEDIA) — Christmas has come early for “conspiracy theorists” around the world. An academic report published by Europhysics News in time for the anniversary of 9/11 is questioning the official explanation for the collapse of all three World Trade Center buildings on September 11, 2001, and their conclusion may make even the most rational person rethink their outlook.