Watts Up With That? | September 24, 2018 With all the crazy talk about “Russian meddling” in the 2016 Presidential election, one wonders if the same sort of crazy talk might be applied to the release of a special climate report just weeks before the U.S. mid-term elections. Given the timing, you can be sure […]
The BBC is a huge bureaucracy. The geniuses running it have declared another bureaucracy - the UN's IPCC - a font of scientific truth. How pathetic.
Global warming projections taken from an earlier IPCC special report, Emissions Scenarios, published in 2000 (graph reproduced here).
Scientific debate can't accomplish its purpose if we pretend there is no debate.
IPCC scientists routinely evaluate their own work. What could possibly go wrong?
History's most momentous climate decision was based on research so preliminary it wasn't published in a scientific journal until seven months later.
Some news outlets still haven't reported on the 3-year-old sexual harassment allegations against prominent climate official, Rajendra Pachauri.
Scientists aren't in charge of interpreting climate research. They're cogs in a political machine.
