The partner to this post is Iraq, Libya, Pakistan Prison Breaks that advance the NATO war agenda These two posts work together, best. :)Killings at Khan al Assal, truth suppression at its most blatant. Over the weekend I chanced across a couple of articles on the NATO backed mercs slaughtering civilians and SAA alike in the town of Khan al Assal. Massacre in Khan al-Assal (Source: SANA) NYT’s July 28/13 FYI: I did check today and the two quoted paragraphs are still as they were on Sunday
“One site the investigators hoped to visit was Khan al-Assal, a town west of Aleppo where both the government and the rebels reported a deadly chemical weapons attack in March, with each side accusing the other.Visiting the site could prove difficult because rebel fighters took it over on Friday, reportedly killing about 150 soldiers. The Syrian Observatory, which sympathizes with the opposition, said about one-third of them were executed by an extremist rebel brigade after surrendering”
Or VOA
Syrian state media accused insurgents on Saturday of killing 123 people, the majority of them civilians, during a rebel offensive this week to take the northern town of Khan al-Assad.
The rebels did kill many and proudly posted their slaughter on line, with their ‘Internet in a suitcase” provided by them from the good ol’ US of A and co. Including Israel.How very convenient. For NATO, that is. Now UN inspectors will have no one to question.NO way to get to the truth. This siege and slaughter by the NATO Islamist Army guaranteed NATO’s crime would stay hidden from the light of day. However, you and I do not need any stinkin’ UN inspectors to inform us that it was NATO’s proxies that used the chemical weapons. Flashback: I had covered the Khan al Assal chemical attacks in a couple of posts earlier this yearApril 2013 and March 2013 Additional reading was left by one of the anonymous commenters yesterday:Syria: The NATO-style Removal of Witnesses
The terrorists wore a significant portion of uniform “clothing signs” such as red headbands and grey uniforms.
Example of identifying headbands
This suggests that these terrorists were obviously freshly put together in advance and intentionally for the attack against Khan al-Assal, and that it were terrorist units, which were equipped by the NATO country Turkey.
Uninformed readers had been suggested in terms of the motive of the attack that by the successful attack against Khan al-Assal the terrorist groups would have achieved an important strategically goal – namely the cut off of the supply route of the Syrian army over the highway from Hama to Aleppo.However, this is utter nonsense, because the supply route of the Syrian army from Hama to Aleppo, as it is commonly known, does not proceed through Khan al-Assal, but through Salamiyah and Khanasser.From a military-strategic point of view, seen from the view of the terrorists, the conquest of Khan al-Assal was practically uselessSyria’s UN Ambassador Bashar Jaafari has now, according to Ria Novosti, alerted about a completely different context, namely, that among the by the terrorists massacred persons in Khan al-Assal were numerous witnesses for the chemical weapons attack of the terrorists against Khan al-Assal in March this year.Therefore, the motif for both, the alleged senseless assault on Khan al-Assal and for the massacre of the prisoners is it to finally muzzle (silence) the witnesses of the chemical weapons attack by the terrorist friends of the NATO-led “Western community of values” on Syrian civilians and soldiers in March 2013 and to remove forensic traces in the area of Khan al-Assal.
“Rebels” have the ear of the UN Security Council
Syrian rebel leaders have met for the first time with the United Nations Security Council to discuss the country's two-year civil war.
They said they were prepared to take part in peace talks if the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad agreed to a political transition, and they appealed to the Russians to end their supply of arms.
Or HereAnd finally, Israel is preparing for war. Obviously. Israel seeks to counter Russian “ship killer” missiles .One of the anonymous commenters had mentioned this info previously. Thanks, because this news jumped right out at me!
Israel's navy is installing the Barak-8 air-defense missile system aboard its combat vessels to protect against Syria's new supersonic Russian-built Yakhont anti-ship missiles, which the Jewish state views as a potent threat to its long-held naval supremacy in the eastern Mediterranean.The Barak-8, effective against anti-ship missiles, supersonic cruise missiles, manned aircraft and drones, is integrated with the ELM-2248 MF-STAR shipborne phased array radar system built by IAI subsidiary Elta.Israel's Rafael Advanced Defense Systems produces the interceptor missiles.The Israeli media reports that the Barak-8 is expected to be operational aboard the navy's three Haifa-built Sa'ar-5 missile ships within the next 3-4 months.These are the navy's largest surface warships. It's not clear whether its eight Saar-4.5 and two Saar-4 corvettes will also be equipped with the Barak-8 system.The Russians began delivering the Yakhonts to Syria in December 2011 under 2007 contract valued at $300 million.Moscow provided the Syrian regime with two Bastion coastal missile systems, comprising 18 mobile launchers and an estimated 72 of the missiles that have a maximum speed of Mach 2, twice the speed of sound, a range of 187 miles and carry a warhead containing 440 pounds of high explosives. The provision of such weapons to the Damascus regime was widely seen as a Russian warning to the United States and Israel not to interfere in the Syrian conflict.
And they call war making "war games" and use the term "war theatre"War is not a game and it is not theatre! The psychopathic elites try to sucker the masses into buying this evil, hiding the vileness behind innocuous words and phrases. Sick.