Stoking the Civil War in Syria
So now we are witnessing the hysterical war hawks of the Obama Administration & Co. calling for military strikes in Syria. What is the real reason for this? Why now? Many commentators have criticized Obama for opposing Assad, yet stopping short of deposing Assad. Why grant verbal support to the rebels, yet refrain (for so long) on direct military support? Why only work covertly through regional proxies/allies? Why was there so much hesitation for so long to pursue war? And why are they pushing so hard for it now? The press likes to refer to U.S. strategy in Syria as “confused” or “contradictory,” but the reality is much worse: it’s pure malevolence. The aim in Syria is to sustain civil war, to give Iran its “Vietnam,” to keep the violence going, and only intervene when its necessary to “tilt the balance” in favor of the rebels. No peace. Only continuous war.
Listen to the podcast show here (Subscribers only):
[private]
[/private]
This site depends exclusively on readers’ support. Please help us continue by SUBSCRIBING, and by ordering our EXCLUSIVE BFP DVDs.