Visit ArabTopics.com

Medea Benjamin: Donald Trump Was Right, NATO Should Be Obsolete

The three smartest words that Donald Trump uttered during his presidential campaign are “NATO is obsolete.” His adversary, Hillary Clinton, retorted that NATO was “the strongest military alliance in the history of the world.” Now that Trump has been in power, the White House parrots the same worn line that NATO is “the most successful Alliance in history, guaranteeing the security, prosperity, and freedom of its members.” But Trump was right the first time around: Rather than being a strong alliance with a clear purpose, this 70-year-old organization that is meeting in London on December 4 is a stale military holdover from the Cold War days that should have gracefully retired many years ago.

NATO was originally founded by the United States and 11 other Western nations as an attempt to curb the rise of communism in 1949. Six years later, Communist nations founded the Warsaw Pact and through these two multilateral institutions, the entire globe became a Cold War battleground. When the USSR collapsed in 1991, the Warsaw Pact disbanded but NATO expanded, growing from its original 12 members to 29 member countries. North Macedonia, set to join next year, will bring the number to 30. NATO has also expanded well beyond the North Atlantic, adding a partnership with Colombia in 2017. Donald Trump recently suggested that Brazil could one day become a full member.

NATO’s post-Cold War expansion toward Russia’s borders, despite earlier promises not to move eastward, has led to rising tensions between Western powers and Russia, including multiple close calls between military forces. It has also contributed to a new arms race, including upgrades in nuclear arsenals, and the largest NATO “war games” since the Cold War.

While claiming to “preserve peace,” NATO has a history of bombing civilians and committing war crimes. In 1999, NATO engaged in military operations without UN approval in Yugoslavia. Its illegal airstrikes during the Kosovo War left hundreds of civilians dead. And far from the “North Atlantic,” NATO joined the United States in invading Afghanistan in 2001, where it is still bogged down two decades later. In 2011, NATO forces illegally invaded Libya, creating a failed state that caused masses of people to flee. Rather than take responsibility for these refugees, NATO countries have turned back desperate migrants on the Mediterranean Sea, letting thousands die.

In London, NATO wants to show it is ready to fight new wars. It will showcase its readiness initiative – the ability to deploy 30 battalions by land, 30 air squadrons and 30 naval vessels in just 30 days, and to confront future threats from China and Russia, including with hypersonic missiles and cyberwarfare. But far from being a lean, mean war machine, NATO is actually riddled with divisions and contradictions. Here are some of them:

  • French President Emmanuel Macron questions the U.S. commitment to fight for Europe has called NATO “brain dead” and has proposed a European Army under the nuclear umbrella of France.

  • Turkey has enraged NATO members with its incursion into Syria to attack the Kurds, who have been Western allies in the fight against ISIS. And Turkey has threatened to veto a Baltic defense plan until allies support its controversial incursion into Syria. Turkey has also infuriated NATO members, especially Trump, by purchasing Russia’s S-400 missile system.

  • Trump wants NATO to push back against China’s growing influence, including the use of Chinese companies for the construction of 5G mobile networks–something many NATO countries are unwilling to do.

  • Is Russia really NATO’s adversary? France’s Macron has reached out to Russia, inviting Putin to discuss ways in which the European Union can put the Crimean invasion behind it. Donald Trump has publicly attacked Germany over its Nord Stream 2 project to pipe in Russian gas, but a recent German poll saw 66 percent wanting closer ties with Russia.

  • The UK has bigger problems. Britain has been convulsed over the Brexit conflict and is holding contentious national election on December 12. British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, knowing that Trump is wildly unpopular, is reluctant to be seen as close to him. Also, Johnson’s major contender, Jeremy Corbyn, is a reluctant supporter of NATO. While his Labour Party is committed to NATO, over his career as an anti-war champion, Corbyn has called NATO “a danger to world peace and a danger to world security.” The last time Britain hosted NATO leaders in 2014, Corbyn told an anti-NATO rally that the end of the Cold War “should have been the time for NATO to shut up shop, give up, go home and go away.”

  • A further complication is Scotland, which is home to a very unpopular Trident nuclear submarine base as part of NATO’s nuclear deterrent. A new Labour government would need the support of the Scottish National Party. But its leader, Nicola Sturgeon, insists that a precondition for her party’s support is a commitment to close the base.

  • Europeans can’t stand Trump (a recent poll found he is trusted by only 4 percent of Europeans!) and their leaders can’t rely on him. Allied leaders learn of presidential decisions that affect their interests via Twitter. The lack of coordination was clear in October, when Trump ignored NATO allies when he ordered U.S. special forces out of northern Syria, where they had been operating alongside French and British commandos against Islamic State militants.

  • The US unreliability has led the European Commission to draw up plans for a European “defense union” that will coordinate military spending and procurement. The next step may be to coordinate military actions separate from NATO. The Pentagon has complained about EU countries purchasing military equipment from each other instead of from the United States, and has called this defense union “a dramatic reversal of the last three decades of increased integration of the transatlantic defence sector.”

  • Do Americans really want to go to war for Estonia? Article 5 of the Treaty states that an attack against one member “shall be considered an attack against them all,” meaning that the treaty obligates the US to go to war on behalf of 28 nations–something most likely opposed by war-weary Americans who want a less aggressive foreign policy that focuses on peace, diplomacy, and economic engagement instead of military force.

An additional major bone of contention is who will pay for NATO. The last time NATO leaders met, President Trump derailed the agenda by berating NATO countries for not paying their fair share and at the London meeting, Trump is expected to announce symbolic US cuts to NATO’s operations budget.

Trump’s main concern is that member states step up to the NATO target of spending 2 percent of their gross domestic products on defense by 2024, a goal that is unpopular among Europeans, who prefer that their tax dollars go for nonmilitary items. Nevertheless, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg will brag that Europe and Canada have added $100 billion to their military budgets since 2016 — something Donald Trump will take credit for — and that more NATO officials are meeting the 2 percent goal, even though a 2019 NATO report shows only seven members have done so: the U.S., Greece, Estonia, the UK, Romania, Poland and Latvia.

In an age where people around the world want to avoid war and to focus instead on the climate chaos that threatens future life on earth, NATO is an anachronism. It now accounts for about three-quarters of military spending and weapons dealing around the globe. Instead of preventing war, it promotes militarism, exacerbates global tensions and makes war more likely. This Cold War relic shouldn’t be reconfigured to maintain U.S. domination in Europe, or to mobilize against Russia or China, or to launch new wars in space. It should not be expanded but disbanded. Seventy years of militarism is more than enough.

Feature photo | In this July 12, 2018 file photo, U.S. President Donald Trump arrives for a press conference during a summit of heads of state and government at NATO headquarters in Brussels. Geert Vanden Wijngaert | AP

Medea Benjamin is cofounder of CODEPINK for Peace, and author of several books, including Inside Iran: The Real History and Politics of the Islamic Republic of Iran

The post Medea Benjamin: Donald Trump Was Right, NATO Should Be Obsolete appeared first on MintPress News.

Source: 
MintPress

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
WWI Hidden History 51
Grayzone Project 261
Pass Blue 264
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 16
John Pilger 420
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 2850
FEE 4949
Marine Le Pen 391
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 1035
Mohamed Omar 392
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 40
Angry Foreigner 18
Fritte Fritzson 12
Teologiska rummet 32
Filosofiska rummet 121
Vetenskapsradion Historia 168
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 233
Les Crises 3094
Richard Falk 184
Ian Sinclair 115
SpinWatch 61
Counter Currents 10458
Kafila 514
Gail Malone 42
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 95
The Duran 10208
Vanessa Beeley 158
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 5731
Paul Craig Roberts 2071
News Junkie Post 58
Nomi Prins 27
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 5279
Sir Ken Robinson 25
Stephan Kinsella 104
Liberty Blitzkrieg 865
Sami Bedouin 65
Consortium News 2685
21 Century Wire 3749
Burning Blogger 324
Stephen Gowans 94
David D. Friedman 157
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1524
Tom Dispatch 561
Levant Report 18
The Saker 4581
The Barnes Review 543
John Friend 503
Psyche Truth 160
Jonathan Cook 162
New Eastern Outlook 4365
School Sucks Project 1785
Giza Death Star 2011
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 630
GMWatch 2431
Robert Faurisson 150
Espionage History Archive 34
Jay's Analysis 1052
Le 4ème singe 90
Jacob Cohen 213
Agora Vox 16985
Cercle Des Volontaires 443
Panamza 2325
Fairewinds 117
Project Censored 1018
Spy Culture 576
Conspiracy Archive 78
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 594
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 887
Independent Science News 83
The Anti Media 6789
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 300
The Mind renewed 448
Natural Society 2621
Yanis Varoufakis 1042
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 114
Web of Debt 151
Porkins Policy Review 439
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 621
Libyan War Truth 341
DeadLine Live 1916
Kevin Ryan 64
BSNEWS 2090
Aaron Franz 247
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 121
Dr. Bruce Levine 151
Peter B Collins 1657
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 11205
Climate Audit 226
Donna Laframboise 466
Judith Curry 1148
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2512
Syria Report 78
Human Rights Investigation 93
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 12535
Laura Wells Solutions 45
Video Rebel's Blog 445
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 21375
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 3135
Northerntruthseeker 2518
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4758
AntiWar.com Blog 3202
AntiWar.com Original Content 7230
Corbett Report 2465
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1241
Webster Tarpley Website 1124

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public