Visit ArabTopics.com

"The CIA Asked Me About Controlling The Climate"- We Should Worry!

I'm trying to clear up some bookmarked pieces- So it's a diversity of topics for today: 
From earlier today: Have We Already Slid Into A Tyranny of Good Intentions?
For your consideration:  The CIA Asked Me About Controlling The Climate.. This is Why We Should Worry

 Brief digression: Personally, I believe weather warfare aka geo-engineering aka “climate intervention” is a big part of the AGW psy op. To put it another way the AGW/global warming hoax gives cover to the long desired, likely some what successful attempts at weather warfare.
Oh and the CIA as our only hope spin really annoys me!

On January 19, 2011, I got a phone call from two men who told me they were consultants for the CIA. Roger Lueken and Michael Canes, analysts for the Logistics Management Institute, asked, among other things, “If another country were trying to control our climate, would we be able to detect it?”

I told them that I thought we could, because if a cloud in the stratosphere were created (the most commonly proposed method of control) that was thick enough, large enough, and long-lasting enough to change the amount of energy reaching Earth, we could certainly see it with the same ground-based and satellite instruments we use to measure stratospheric clouds from volcanic eruptions. If, on the other hand, low clouds were being brightened over the ocean (another suggested means of cooling the climate), we could see telltale patterns in the tops of the clouds with satellite photos. And it would also be easy to observe aeroplanes or ships injecting gases or particles into the atmosphere.

At the same time, I wondered whether they also wanted to know if others would know about it, if the CIA was controlling the world’s climate. Given that the CIA is a major sponsor of the recently released US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) reports on geoengineering (which they have renamed “climate intervention”), the question arises as to the possible interest of the CIA in global climate control.

Let me be clear. I completely agree with all the NAS findings. Global warming is real and is being caused by humans, mainly by burning coal, oil, petrol and natural gas, which puts carbon dioxide – a greenhouse gas – into the atmosphere. Global warming will result in major harm to humanity if left unchecked. The solution is to stop using fossil fuels for our energy supply and switch to solar and wind power, and to adapt to some of the coming climate change.

Geoengineering by blocking sunlight should not be implemented now, as its risks and benefits are too uncertain, but we need more research on the various proposed scenarios. Taking carbon dioxide out of the air is a good thing, but currently extremely expensive, and we need research on that, too.

Taking carbon dioxide out of the air may impede our ability to grow food.. never mind the decimation of our forests (the lungs of our planet) Oh and the harm to all living beings...

The 2014 US Quadrennial Defense Review makes clear that climate change poses a major threat to the US and the rest of the world. It says: “The pressures caused by climate change will influence resource competition while placing additional burdens on economies, societies, and governance institutions around the world. These effects are threat multipliers that will aggravate stressors abroad such as poverty, environmental degradation, political instability, and social tensions – conditions that can enable terrorist activity and other forms of violence.”
Certainly it is the job of the US military and the CIA to help protect our country from such threats, and it is not surprising that the CIA is interested to learn about geoengineering. In fact, the CIA opened a Center on Climate Change and National Security in 2009. When it was forced by Congress to close it in 2012, it said they would continue working on these issues anyway.

Whether you see the role of the CIA in climate change as nefarious or protective depends on how you weigh evidence with your preconceived notions. There is a long history of weather and climate control being proposed for military purposes, as described brilliantly in the 2010 book by James Fleming, Fixing the Sky, but there is no evidence the CIA is doing anything wrong on this issue.

 A lack of evidence of wrong doing does not disprove wrong doing- that's a completely misleading statement. Surely crimes are committed daily and the evidence of these crimes are unknown. Considering the covert nature of the CIA and it's operations- one has to realize that any evidence of wrong doing would be hidden or obfuscated.

  I know of no way to control local or regional climate with geoengineering without effects elsewhere, but while it is possible that such techniques could be developed by research, geoengineering for hostile purposes is prohibited by the United Nations Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques.

The author 'not knowing' is meaningless- Particularly when he acknowledges the possibility of these techniques being developed and researched- and the fact that this is prohibited by the UN is pretty meaningless, unless we understand that it should be taken as an admonishment to keep that type of research as well hidden/obfuscated as possible

I don’t want to be working on geoengineering. But I don’t yet see the political will in the world to address global warming. If the US enhances its research efforts on geoengineering, we will learn about both the potential risks and benefits of its implementation, so that future policymakers will be able to make informed decisions, and not hasty ones in a panic if confronted by environmental dangers.
My recent work lists five potential benefits and 26 potential risks of stratospheric geoengineering, and the number one benefit – if stratospheric geoengineering is possible at all (an important research question) – is that it could cool the planet, reversing some of the dangers of global warming. But will we ever be able to overcome the governance and ethical issues?
Thus further research is urgently needed. In the meantime, we need to vigorously move to a carbon-free energy system"

A carbon free energy system is nonsense. It's a weird sort of spin emanating from a carbon based life form on a carbon based planet.

Source: 
Penny for your thoughts

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
Grayzone Project 11
Pass Blue 56
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 14
John Pilger 410
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 27
Need To Know News 1681
FEE 3241
Marine Le Pen 231
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 543
Mohamed Omar 242
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 37
Angry Foreigner 17
Fritte Fritzson 11
Teologiska rummet 32
Filosofiska rummet 71
Vetenskapsradion Historia 117
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 177
Les Crises 1881
Richard Falk 115
Ian Sinclair 79
SpinWatch 50
Counter Currents 6318
Kafila 356
Gail Malone 33
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 93
The Duran 6551
Vanessa Beeley 93
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 4811
Paul Craig Roberts 1155
News Junkie Post 44
Nomi Prins 24
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 3465
Sir Ken Robinson 16
Stephan Kinsella 66
Liberty Blitzkrieg 795
Sami Bedouin 61
Consortium News 2152
21 Century Wire 2910
Burning Blogger 280
Stephen Gowans 67
David D. Friedman 128
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1465
Tom Dispatch 409
Levant Report 17
The Saker 3431
The Barnes Review 472
John Friend 366
Psyche Truth 146
Jonathan Cook 135
New Eastern Outlook 3108
School Sucks Project 1736
Giza Death Star 1564
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 567
GMWatch 1801
Robert Faurisson 148
Espionage History Archive 34
Jay's Analysis 743
Le 4ème singe 87
Jacob Cohen 197
Agora Vox 10772
Cercle Des Volontaires 417
Panamza 1646
Fairewinds 103
Project Censored 720
Spy Culture 368
Conspiracy Archive 66
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 489
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 546
Independent Science News 66
The Anti Media 5573
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 259
The Mind renewed 211
Natural Society 2467
Yanis Varoufakis 814
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 65
Web of Debt 125
Porkins Policy Review 347
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 563
Libyan War Truth 280
DeadLine Live 1905
Kevin Ryan 61
BSNEWS 1964
Aaron Franz 186
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 121
Dr. Bruce Levine 111
Peter B Collins 1337
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 9546
Climate Audit 220
Donna Laframboise 355
Judith Curry 1052
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 1991
Syria Report 70
Human Rights Investigation 90
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 10118
Laura Wells Solutions 27
Video Rebel's Blog 411
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 17843
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 2657
Northerntruthseeker 2043
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4616
AntiWar.com Blog 2688
AntiWar.com Original Content 6112
Corbett Report 2087
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1106
Webster Tarpley Website 940

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public