research

A study made headlines after stating that there is no way of knowing just how much sugar consumption is too much, and the methods used to create dietary sugar intake limits are flawed.

On May 4, Johnson & Johnson was ordered by a Missouri jury to pay $110 million to a Virginia woman who claimed in a lawsuit that she developed ovarian cancer after using the company’s talc-based products for feminine hygiene for decades. [1]
Lois Slemp, 62, alleged that her use of J&J’s Shower-to-Shower and Baby Products over 4 decades, as well as asbestos particles found inside her, caused her cancer. [2]

This week on #GoodNewsNextWeek: West Virginia is on a roll now with health and hemp; Baltimore's trash-eating monster is a clean sight to see; and studies show you should get naked and go to nature.

This week on #GoodNewsNextWeek: West Virginia is on a roll now with health and hemp; Baltimore's trash-eating monster is a clean sight to see; and studies show you should get naked and go to nature.

Superbug fungus, artificial wombs and genetic memories + this day in history w/the Polio vaccine and our song of the day by Melodysheep on your Morning Monarchy for April 26, 2017.

Breakfast like a king, compostable cups and the Maryjane Report + this day in history w/OKC bombing and our song of the day by Beth Ditto on your Morning Monarchy for April 19, 2017.

Hugging robots, banishing queues and increasing our influence + this day in history w/firing Dave Mustaine and our song of the day by Future Islands on your Morning Monarchy for April 11, 2017.

This week on the New World Next Week: the doomsday seed vault gets a doomsday data neighbor; billionaires are shelling out mega-bucks to define fake news; and a graphene-based sieve promises seawater solutions.

This week on the New World Next Week: the doomsday seed vault gets a doomsday data neighbor; billionaires are shelling out mega-bucks to define fake news; and a graphene-based sieve promises seawater solutions.

It came to light recently that the EPA official tasked with evaluating the cancer risk associated with glyphosate – a toxic herbicide chemical – may have bragged that he deserved a medal if he could ‘ruin another agency’s investigation into glyphosate.’ [1]
The EPA official, Jess Rowland, allegedly made these comments during an April 2015 phone conversation, farmers and others who claim they were sickened by glyphosate say.