Noting that boosters are “not risk-free”, the immunologist Paul Offit has written in the New England Journal of Medicine that “all age groups are at risk for the theoretical problem of an “original antigenic sin”".
The post ‘Original Antigenic Sin’ Mentioned in the New England Journal of Medicine appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
By Aaron Kheriaty | The Brownstone Institute | March 28, 2022 In January 2020, at the very start of the pandemic, the New England Journal of Medicine published a letter that suggesting the possibility that covid could be spread by people who did not show any symptoms of the illness. This article was based on a single case […]
Dr Robert Malone branded a “terrorist” by Italian media By Paul Joseph Watson | Summit News | October 7, 2021 Dr Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA vaccines, says he was branded a “terrorist” by the media in Italy and warns that physicians who speak out are being “hunted via medical boards and the press.” […]
I'm not an epidemiologist but I watch the COVID numbers every day and it looks like Wave II has kicked in. It's worse in the U.S. than anywhere but the only countries where nothing much is happening are the countries where people have no problem with wearing masks. yesterday there were more than 4,000 new cases reported in each of 16 countries:
The paper suggests that “employment suspension or stay-at-home orders,” should be issued, but that fines should be discouraged because they can be legally challenged. The paper also recommends that government health authorities should avoid making public their close relationship with vaccine manufacturers
By Donna Laframboise | Big Picture News | June 17, 2020
The lead author of two retracted COVID-19 papers is editor-in-chief of an Elsevier medical journal.
As of two days ago, Boris Johnson’s government announced it will henceforth be illegal to use public transportation in the UK, without wearing a mask.
But do masks actually do anything to prevent the spread of this disease? Or respiratory diseases in general?
More than a handful of doctor have been caught in the act of needlessly giving out or overcharging for cancer drugs to make a quick buck. It seems that some doctors are either intentionally or wrongfully diagnosing sickness, or are immorally pocketing cash from treatment costs.
As the New York Times has pointed out:
Newly released historical documents reveal that the sugar industry paid scientists in the 1960’s to downplay the link between sugar consumption and heart disease and promote saturated fat as the cause, instead. [1]
JAMA Internal Medicine published an analysis of the internal sugar industry documents, which were uncovered by a researcher at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), on September 12.
