False Positive

In the week that all students returned to school, only 0.06% of rapid Covid tests produced positive results. But how many of these were false positives, and how many families were forced to isolate as a result?
The post 0.06% of School Covid Tests Positive Last Week appeared first on Lockdown Sceptics.

WHO admitted that the PCR test is arbitrary because “... the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.” Since it is well known that the PCR test is used as the primary diagnostic tool, WHO removed this message from the Internet.

A remarkable story made headlines last week — a goat, a quail and a papaya tested positive for coronavirus.

The “pandemic effect” is entirely without scientific support. For example, literature from Creative Diagnostics, a manufacturer of PCR test kit components, says "For research use only, not for use in diagnostic procedures.”

The US FDA has approved a new test to detect COVID-19. The blood test detects antibodies to the virus rather than the virus itself. Neither the false positives nor the genuine positives will be a measure of risk but, none the less, they will be used as proof that the 'deadly' pandemic is spreading.

David Crowe says that, because the PCR test looks for RNA, there is no proof that it detects a virus. The data is being interpreted to benefit the viral theory, and there is zero concern for false positive results.

Many people would be surprised to learn that there are flaws in virus detection in ELISA tests to RNA/ PCR tests. Massive sums of money are being allocated to fight the virus, which sets the stage for greed and corruption by powerful people.