Invisible Scientific Debates
Scientific debate can't accomplish its purpose if we pretend there is no debate.
Scientific debate can't accomplish its purpose if we pretend there is no debate.
IPCC scientists routinely evaluate their own work. What could possibly go wrong?
History's most momentous climate decision was based on research so preliminary it wasn't published in a scientific journal until seven months later.
Scientists aren't in charge of interpreting climate research. They're cogs in a political machine.
The claim that human activity is triggering a climate apocalypse is based on expert opinion and best estimates.
Strip away the pseudoscience and you'll find one thing: politics. People attempting, via international treaties, to constrain human lives. For the sake of Mother Gaia.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: threatening us with hellfire and damnation.
An organization whose reputation is in tatters links its new document to a rude, intolerant, highly politicized climate crusader.
Credentialed, experienced critics declare that the UN's climate panel is politicized - and that many of its conclusions are mistaken.