James Surowiecki wonders about the failure to rein in out-of-control CEO pay, and reaches a conclusion that may surprise you
"[T]he failure of say-on-pay suggests that shareholders and boards genuinely believe that outsized C.E.O. remuneration holds the key to corporate success."-- James Surowiecki, in "Why C.E.O. Pay Reform Failed"by KenRemember, not so long ago, when the issue of outlandish, and ever outlandisher, executive pay was a burning issue, or at least an issue, in the land?