Birth Pangs

Al Jazeera citing the Turkish Ministry of Defence (which is a primary source for information)

Following up on the previous report :

Just a quick news grab as this latest attack on Iraq is occurring.

• Retaliatory U.S. airstrikes underway after 2 American troops killed in Iraq

The U.S. is conducting retaliatory airstrikes in Iraq after two U.S. and one British service member died in a rocket attack Wednesday, a U.S. official confirmed to POLITICO.

Is this really a "new mission" for American forces?  What rubbish! What is being stated in this 4 minute audio piece is exactly what readers here have been informed of for quite some time!Yup, it's yet another "no shit sherlock" oh so obvious , exactly as  planned happening.Last time this subject was brought up here was nearly 5 months ago..

The ceasefire looks to be holding, but, I've some concerns about statements made by US Special Representative of Syria James Jeffrey  It appears to me the US might have some ideas about interfering with this arrangement.  Pay particular attention to Jeffrey's statements- Bearing in mind he is speaking on behalf of the US administration!

The ceasefire agreement was general- based on previous agreements made.Now comes the fine tuning. Conducted through a series of meetings. The first will take place tomorrow:

 In 2018 I'd posted a series of reports that explained how it was, hopefully, Idlib, would be returned to Syria.  Perhaps not entirely, initially, but most of it will be retaken by Damascus.  As explained by Firas Tlass, coming to fruition in the Idlib agreement of 2018.  This required the removal of the US/UK/French/Israeli terror crowd and the cooperation of Syria, Turkey and Russia.  The Usrael Kurd/coalition occupation force are of course the wild cards  This agreement formed the parameters for the process- it was not etched in stone with fixed dates and the like.

What party/ies don’t want a cease fire?

Well that's a "no shit sherlock" statement. And yet, amazingly, a very few seem to grasp this.Why is that? No, really, why is that? Because I absolutely don't get how so many fail to grasp the obviousness of this statement?sputnik

 As has been oft stated here... the situation in Syria is just one of the many inevitable birth pangs  as the new region, what ever form that may take, is in the process of being birthed.    This is not a place that is Syria centric at this time and quite frankly hasn't been for a very long time now.   Assad made statements regarding Turkey and Muslim Brotherhood while failing to mention Syria's long, long history with this group. Why would he do this?