Iain Davis In the final installment of this three part series we’ll look at the evident political bias and staggering conflicts of financial interest polluting much of “the Climate Science™.” To have a full grasp of the arguments informing this article, if you haven’t already done so, please read Part 1 and Part 2. In Part 1 we looked at …
Iain Davis In Part 1 we questioned the fundamental principles said to underpin “the Climate Science™.” Specifically we considered the scientific validity of the claimed “consensus” and explored some of the many scientific doubts expressed about Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) theory and the so-called “greenhouse effect.” We noted the contradictory layman’s explanation of AGW theory offered by …
Iain Davis At the recent 28th Conference of Parties (COP28), convened by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the British aristocrat, political lobbyist and climate activist, King Charles III, said: I have spent a large proportion of my life trying to warn of the existential threats facing us over global warming, climate change and biodiversity …
By Judith Curry | Climate Etc. | August 27, 2015 Critiques, the 3%, and is 47 the new 97? For background, see my previous post The 97% feud. Cook et al. critiques At the heart of the consensus controversy is the paper by Cook et al. (2013), which inferred a 97% consensus by classifying abstracts […]
