Greg Sargent summed up Tuesday's SOTU speech very well: "Trump's State of the Union speech repeated all of his most reprehensible lies, and suggests he still won't accept the new reality in Washington." Sargent boded that he "demanded total capitulation" from Pelosi and that "he won;'t get it." Even aside from the disdain-- if not contempt-- in which most voters hold Trump, the Democrats have the issues. Trump can try to paint Medicare-For-All, free public college, a livable minimum wage and taxing the super-rich as "socialism," but polls show that most voters support all of them-- and by wide margins. Yesterday Elizabeth Warren sent this smile graphic out to her supporters, showing that a new poll shows how popular her Ultra-Millionaire Tax is:"Insiders in Washington," she wrote "like to label any idea that might challenge the wealthy and the well-connected as 'radical' or 'outside the mainstream,' but we’ve got news for them: America is far more progressive than they think. When it comes to the core economic issues we’re fighting for-- raising the minimum wage, expanding Social Security, paid family leave, debt-free college-- a majority of all Americans, Democrats and Republicans, agree."And this report from Amanda Gordon for yesterday's Bloomberg News, Mega-Rich at Palm Beach Soiree Dismiss Democrats' Tax Proposals plays right into the Democrats' hands. "The party at the Norton Museum of Art Saturday night," wrote Gordon, "had all the trappings of the Palm Beach high season-- those Stubbs & Wootton slippers, some fabulous gowns, and, with President Trump ensconced at Mar-a-Lago, a healthy disregard for the tax plans being floated by a wide field of potential Democrat candidates in 2020."
“They’re going to eat themselves alive,” Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said.“Those plans are so antithetical for what’s good for growth in our country, they’ll go nowhere,” Citadel founder Ken Griffin said. Improving public K-12 education would be a much better way to address inequality than tax increases that are “trying to destroy the wealth creators of our society,” he added.But maybe there was “literally zero” chatter about the Democrats’ tax proposals, as Griffin put it, because everybody was chattering about Lord Norman Foster’s expansion of the museum, which reopens next week. The gala celebrating the occasion captured, in one night, the energy and ambition of a new Palm Beach.Griffin brought some of that energy as he dashed into the museum without stopping to look at his name in letters on the new building in West Palm Beach. He had a lot of people to catch up with before sitting down on gold cushions with Leonard Lauder and the architect to dine on melon and shrimp, filet and Bananas Foster.An obvious topic was Griffin’s recent home purchases-- a $123 million house in London and a $238 million New York apartment designed by Robert A.M. Stern.
Sahil Kapur also wites for Bloomberg News and yesterday he was writing how the Democrats candidates for president are swinging left in a return to the party's FDR roots. "A flurry of proposals to slap new taxes on the ultra-wealthy, extend Medicare to all Americans and make college debt-free reflect a rapidly changing Democratic Party that sees a sharp left turn as the path to defeating President Donald Trump," he wrote. "Some of the party’s top 2020 presidential hopefuls are wading into uncharted political waters in an effort to demonstrate their commitment to mitigating income inequality."He wasn't talking about Biden, Bloomberg, McAuliffe, Delaney. Klobuchar, Bennet, Hickenlooper, the "centrists." Beto may attempt to run as a progressivish candidate as well; no way to tell yet. Gillibrand, Tulsi and Harris all decided to run as progressives despite their records. (Tulsi seems to have genuinely transformed; the other 2 appear to be opportunists.) Castro and Booker are doing the progressive thing as well now.Actual progressives, Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, Jeff Merkley, Marianne Williamson and, I think, Jay Inslee fit Kapur's description better. Kapur warns them that "moderate Democrats warn that the party wins elections not by indulging its most liberal impulses but by hewing to the political center. And Trump has made clear he’s ready to use the leftward tilt by Democrats as a wedge issue in 2020." He seems to be reporting that enormously popular proposals-- take Medicare-For-All, debt-free college, and making the rich pay their fair share of taxes-- are going to hurt progressives. Not everyone agrees.
"The Democrats are swinging for the fences this time," said Stephanie Kelton, an economist who advised Sanders in his bid for the 2016 Democratic nomination. "You’re seeing kind of a return to the roots of the Democratic Party in the FDR era."Much like Franklin Delano Roosevelt did in the 1930s, Democratic contenders are pushing tax hikes on the wealthy to finance an expansion of government security programs. They’re also seeking to make good on Roosevelt’s "Second Bill of Rights" that he proposed in the 1944 State of the Union, one year before he died and the goal fizzled."The things that FDR enumerated in that speech-- the right to a living wage and job and education and housing and secure retirement-- that’s big stuff, and you have someone on the Democratic side with legislation for almost everything on that agenda," Kelton said.The Democratic hunger for more liberal policy prescriptions-- as well as leaders who reflect the demographics of a party reliant on young people, minorities and women-- was evident in the 2018 elections as upstarts like Representatives Ayanna Pressley of Boston and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York ousted longtime Democratic incumbents."People are sick of half-measures," said Senator Brian Schatz of Hawaii. "Americans are struggling mightily to get into the middle class, or stay in the middle class, and the job of the Democratic Party is to come up with a real program to solve those problems."The issue that has most energized the progressive base is a "Medicare for all" system that would establish a federal insurance program and scrap most private insurance. Legislation called the Medicare For All Act, unveiled in 2017 by Sanders, of Vermont, has been cosponsored by 2020 hopefuls in the Senate like Harris of California, Warren of Massachusetts, Booker of New Jersey, and Kirsten Gillibrand of New York. Sanders plans to reintroduce the Medicare For All Act in the new Congress.At a CNN town hall last week in Iowa, Harris offered a ringing endorsement of Medicare for all and said she’d do away with private insurance. "Let’s eliminate all of that," she said, after describing its hassles. Warren took a more cautious approach, declining twice on Bloomberg TV to say if she’s scrap private insurers as part of her plan, saying that she sees "lots of paths" to universal coverage.“We know where we’re aiming, and that is every American has health care at a price they can afford,” Warren said.The eagerness among Democratic hopefuls to reverse the party’s centrist turn in the 1990s is drawing pushback from some of its architects, who credit the shift for Bill Clinton’s success in breaking years of Republican dominance in presidential elections."Our view is that Medicare for all would be a catastrophic idea for the Democratic nominee to run on in 2020," said Matt Bennett, a spokesman for the centrist Democratic group Third Way. Bennett said progressive litmus tests like single payer are "dangerous" if the party wants to unseat Trump. "Medicare for all does well on Twitter and in riling up base voters, but in the end is not going to be politically resonant in the places where Democrats simply must win, which is the former blue wall states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania," he said.But Democratic Senator Tammy Baldwin won re-election in November by more than 10 points in Wisconsin on an unabashedly progressive platform that included Medicare for all. In an interview, she rejected the idea that running to the left would hurt her party’s prospects in the state, which Trump won in 2016. Democratic candidates are "all pushing in the direction that anyone from Wisconsin would want," she said.In his State of the Union address Tuesday night, Trump previewed how he would use the shift in the campaign with a dire comparison to the chaos in socialist Venezuela.“Here in the United States, we are alarmed by new calls to adopt socialism in our country,” he said, adding, “Tonight, we renew our resolve that America will never be a socialist country.”Still, recent national surveys show strong support across party lines for sharp tax hikes on the affluent, including Warren’s annual tax on wealth above $50 million and Ocasio-Cortez’s proposal of tax rates up to 70 percent on incomes above $10 million....While outspoken progressives like Ocasio-Cortez drove the conversation, Democrats took control of the House in 2018 by capturing seats from Republicans in moderate districts. Many of those Democrats are keeping their distance from Medicare for all and other ideas gaining steam on the left, wary of how they’d fare with more conservative voters."We can’t forget that the way we won the House majority was through the middle," said Representative Josh Gottheimer, who won a competitive district in northern New Jersey.Incredible how conservatism and corruption are so totally connected in politicsThe early tone of the Democratic primary debate provides a marked contrast from Hillary Clinton’s winning 2016 campaign. She rejected Medicare for all and debt-free college in favor of ideas she described as more pragmatic, such as improving the Affordable Care Act marketplaces and incremental steps to mitigate student debt.She won, but not before an unexpectedly strong challenge from Sanders."Hillary had a progressive approach but it was a pragmatic progressive approach. Bernie’s approach was-- you could call it more progressive but he was not pragmatic,” said Adrienne Elrod, a former spokeswoman for Clinton’s 2016 campaign. "But one of the reasons Bernie did catch on is he really spoke to income inequality. Bernie’s message tended to stick out."Elrod said that Medicare for all is popular because "people are seeing that the ACA, especially with the individual mandate gone, is not working for them. Their health care costs are still escalating. It’s an issue that’s going to drive this election, so anyone who takes a half-assed approach to it and does not support a more progressive health care position is going to lose."Medicare for all may face opposition from more moderate Democrats weighing a run. Former Vice President Joe Biden has long resisted the idea, though he hasn’t discussed it recently. Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who is considering a run for the Democratic nomination, said recently that it would "bankrupt for us for a very long time." Bloomberg is the founder and majority owner of Bloomberg LP, the parent company of Bloomberg News."There’s still that middle section of the country that wants a more moderate approach to governing. So yes, there’s always a danger," Elrod said. "But you’re not going to get through a Democratic primary if you take moderate stances on very high-profile important economic issues like health care like income inequality."
