Do you ever listen to crackpots like Trump, Carson, Fiorina, Cruz... ranting and raving, just lying their asses off, and wonder who the hell is stupid enough to listen to these people-- let alone vote for them? Or wonder who's stupid enough to sit and listen to Hate Talk Radio and Fox "News" all day, not as a lark but as a source of "information?" Take a look at this chart of the dozen most obese states-- the states where people, literally, eat themselves to death.Most of the serious diseases that kill Americans or at lest debilitate their lives substantially-- diseases like cancer and diabetes-- are correlated with obesity, but being a conservative in 2015 means you probably don't believe that, the way conservatives didn't believe that smoking tobacco correlated to disease and cancer just a few decades ago. Those states have among the highest death rates from cancer of any states in America. And they drive up the costs of health care for the rest of us. States, from worst to least bad:
• Kentucky 201.2 deaths per 100,000 residents• Mississippi 200.0• West Virginia 191.1• Louisiana 190.5• Oklahoma 189.6• Arkansas 188.6• Tennessee 187.9• Alabama 184.8• Indiana 184.2• South Carolina 179.0• Texas 160.6• North Dakota 150.7
Every one of these states is what you would call a "red state." They all voted overwhelmingly for Mitt Romney against Barack Obama in 2012, Oklahoma, for example, giving Obama only 33% of its vote, West Virginia 36%. And except for West Virginia, all of these obese states have very backward Republican governors. And except for Kentucky-- which has a split legislature-- all these states have gigantic Republican majorities in both houses of their state legislatures. None are friendly towards environmental laws nor towards any kind of consumer protection legislation and almost all of them have-- for sick ideological and political reasons-- refused to expand Medicaid to help their citizens afford health care.By way of comparison, states where normal people live don't have these large cancer deaths to add to their woes, according to the CDC. California's rate is 151.0; Colorado's is 143.7; Connecticut's is 152.0; and Minnesota's is 155.6. Now factor in these charts below of the top 5 state's in each category and see what you come up with-- aside from a certainty that all of these states will keep electing conservative Republicans who will keep enacting policies that will kill them and their children at a much higher rate than normal states do. They serve the interests of what Bernie calls "the billionaire class," especially the most viciously predatory billionaires like the Koch brothers.That all said, I want to share an article by Sam Stebbins and Tom Frohlich from USA Today with you that explains that although the cost of healthcare in the U.S.-- covering a wide range of areas, from medical practitioner salaries and costly medical procedures, to pharmaceutical products and hospital administration-- is the highest in the world, the outcomes are certainly not the best. They start with a simple fact: "countries spending the most on health care today allocate between 8.9% and 16.4% of their total gross domestic product (GDP) to health care costs... The United States spends about $8,713 per person on health care annually, by far the most of any country in the world. By contrast, many countries, including Turkey and India, spend less than $1,000 on health care per person annually."
All of the 10 countries on the list spend at least 8.9% of their total GDP on health care. The difference, however, between the No. 1 spender, the United States, and the No. 10 spender, Canada, is quite large. Canada spent 10.2% of its GDP on health care in 2013, which amounted to $4,351 per person, while the United States spent 16.4% of its GDP that year, amounting to $8,713 per person.According to Francesca Colombo, head of the health division at the OECD, "Higher health sector prices explain much of the difference between the U.S. and other high-spending countries." She added that the health care system in the United States is also fragmented and overly complex, with a larger share of uninsured individuals than is common among developed countries. While every country on the list has near universal health care coverage, only 88.5% of Americans are insured. However, under the Affordable Care Act, the U.S. uninsured rate is on the decline.People living in the countries with the highest health spending also tend to have better health outcomes. For example, of the 10 countries spending the most on health care, seven have a lower infant mortality rate than the OECD average. Similarly, all but two countries on the list have a higher life expectancy than the OECD average of 80.5 years.However, the relationship between spending and outcomes, and what causes good health is far from straightforward. A number of behavioral and lifestyle factors have a major influence on health outcomes. Colombo explained that "factors outside the health sector," including nutrition, alcohol consumption, and smoking "are important determinants of health outcomes."Though the United States spends far more on health care than any other nation, life expectancy of the average American is only 78.8 years, lower than the OECD average and the lowest among the top spending nations. Lifestyle choices in the country may be partially to blame. Slightly more than 35% of American adults are obese, a higher share than in any of the 43 countries the OECD reviewed...1. United States• Health expenditure per capita: $8,713• Expenditure as a pct. of GDP: 16.4%• Obesity rate: 35.3%• Life expectancy: 78.8While higher health care spending generally leads to better health outcomes, this is famously not the case in the United States. The country, which is one of the world's wealthiest, spends by far the most on health care. The United States spends around $8,700 per capita each year on health care, more than double the OECD average and well more than second place Switzerland.Despite the high spending, Americans are not anywhere near the world's healthiest. More than 35% of Americans are obese, one of the highest rate in the world, and exceptionally high compared with other countries spending the most on health. The United States is also the only top 10 country for health spending where the life expectancy does not exceed 80 years. Also, perhaps as a consequence of poor economic and social factors as well as the inefficient spending, adverse health outcomes such as infant mortality have increased in the United States. While in 2000, the incidence of infant mortality in the United States was lower than the OECD average, today it is higher.2. Switzerland• Health expenditure per capita: $6,325• Expenditure as a pct. of GDP: 11.1%• Obesity rate: 10.3%• Life expectancy: 82.9With universal health care for every citizen, Switzerland spends more on health care per capita than every country except for the United States. Higher spending in Switzerland is accompanied by better health outcomes. The national obesity rate of 10.3% is one of the lowest worldwide. A relatively low obesity rate likely contributes to the Swiss' perception of their own health. Nearly 81% of Swiss adults report being in good or very good health, a higher share than in all but six of the countries reviewed.With more than 17 nurses for every 1,000 citizens, no country in the world is home to a larger concentration of practicing nurses than Switzerland. Switzerland also has a relatively high doctor to patient ratio with about four practicing doctors for every 1,000 residents. With a low obesity rate and plenty of health care providers, people in Switzerland can expect to live to be about 83, a higher life expectancy than in all but two of the 43 countries examined by the OECD.3. Norway• Health expenditure per capita: $5,862• Expenditure as a pct. of GDP: 8.9%• Obesity rate: 10.0%• Life expectancy: 81.8As in a number of other European nations, health care is universal in Norway. Through an agreement with the European Union (EU), all EU citizens are covered by the system, and undocumented immigrants are permitted free emergency treatment only. Due largely to Norway's centralized medical system, $4,981 of the $5,862 total per capita annual health spending comes from public sources-- the highest public contribution of all OECD nations. The high health care spending in Norway means more health practitioners. There are approximately four doctors and 17 nurses per 1,000 Norwegians, the fourth and second highest concentrations among countries reviewed.As in other prosperous nations, Norway has a relatively high incidence of cancer at 318 cases per 100,000 people each year. However, this is largely due to the long life expectancy. Norway has one of the longest life expectancies in the world, at 81.8 years. Despite the high incidence, Norwegian cancer patients have relatively high survival rates.4. Netherlands• Health expenditure per capita: $5,131• Expenditure as a pct. of GDP: 11.1%• Obesity rate: 11.1%• Life expectancy: 81.4Residents of the Netherlands, except for conscientious objectors and members of the military, are required to purchase health care by a government mandate implemented in 2006. Only around 1% of country residents do not have insurance. The country's health care expenditure, which at $5,131 per capita trails only three other OECD nations, amounts to 11.1% of GDP, the second largest share after the United States. While residents are required to purchase health insurance, the cost is mostly covered by the government. Out-of-pocket expenses account for just 5.2% of the overall cost, the lowest such share among countries reviewed by the OECD.Like most other prosperous nations spending the most on health care, people in the Netherlands-- even the elderly-- have a relatively positive perception of their own health. Nearly 60% of country residents 65 and over believe they are in good health, considerably higher than the OECD average proportion of 43.4%.5. Sweden• Health expenditure per capita: $4,904• Expenditure as a pct. of GDP: 11.0%• Obesity rate: 11.7%• Life expectancy: 82.0OECD nations spend an average of $3,453 per capita on health care annually. Sweden spends roughly $1,500 more than the average, the fifth largest sum among OECD nations. In 1970, Swedish citizens had a life expectancy of about 75 years, longer than citizens of any other country at that time. Although life expectancy in the Scandinavian country has increased since then to 82 years, Sweden now has only the ninth longest life expectancy as life expectancy globally has been on the rise over the past several decades.Despite universal health insurance coverage, Swedes visit the doctor relatively infrequently. With an average of 2.9 physician consultations per person per year, people in Sweden see a doctor less often than people in most other countries reviewed. More than 81% of Swedish citizens report being in good or very good health, a larger share than in all but five nations examined by the OECD. This may partially explain the infrequent doctor visits in Sweden.6. Germany• Health expenditure per capita: $4,819• Expenditure as a pct. of GDP: 11.0%• Obesity rate: 23.6%• Life expectancy: 80.9Older people typically require more medical attention than younger people, and more than a fifth of Germany’s population is 65 and older, the largest share in the world after Japan and Italy. Germany spent roughly 11% of its total GDP on health care in 2013, or $4,819 per capita, each higher than all but a handful of other countries.Compared to the United States, Germans are very well insured. While slightly less than 89% of Americans are insured through both public and private avenues, nearly all Germans are insured on either public or private plans. The country’s universal health care system likely encourages preventative care visits. On average, a German resident consulted a physician roughly 10 times in 2013, more than double the consultation rate in the United States.7. Denmark• Health expenditure per capita: $4,553• Expenditure as a pct. of GDP: 10.4%• Obesity rate: 14.2%• Life expectancy: 80.4Denmark spent 8.4% of its GDP on health care in 1980, the most of any country that year. Since then, however, health care spending has increased in all OECD nations. So while Denmark’s spending increased to about 10.4% of its GDP, it now spends the seventh most on health care worldwide, both in dollars terms and as a share of GDP. While spending in the Scandinavian nation is near historic highs now, it will likely grow in the future as the population ages. The share of the country’s population 65 and older is projected to rise from about 18.3% in 2014 to nearly 23.8% by 2050.Though Denmark is one of many OECD countries with universal health care, no nation’s government absorbs more of the cost. The Danish government covers about 84.3% of health care costs compared to an average of 36.9% of total health care costs across OECD nations.8. Austria• Health expenditure per capita: $4,553• Expenditure as a pct. of GDP: 10.1%• Obesity rate: 12.4%• Life expectancy: 81.2As in most countries spending the most on health care, nearly all of Austria’s 8.5 million citizens have health insurance. Though Austrian citizens have some unhealthy habits, health outcomes in the country are generally very good. While alcohol consumption in the Central European nation is the second highest among countries examined by the OECD, only 12.4% of adults in Austria identify as obese, a lower obesity rate than in all but 10 of the 43 countries the OECD reviewed. As was the case in all of the countries spending the most on health care, health expenditure and life expectancy has increased over the past several decades. Austria spent about 7% of GDP on health care in 1980. By 2013, health care spending had increased to 10.1% of GDP. Over the decades from 1970 to 2013, life expectancy increased by over 10 years from 70 to 81, a slightly faster improvement than the OECD average change.9. Luxembourg• Health expenditure per capita: $4,371• Expenditure as a pct. of GDP: N/A• Obesity rate: 22.7%• Life expectancy: 81.9In the small, affluent European nation of Luxembourg, health care spending per capita is among the highest in the world at $4,371. As is nearly always the case, the lion’s share of funding comes from the public sector. Just $762 of Luxembourg’s health expenditure comes from private sources. Luxembourg is quite wealthy. With GDP per capita of $91,048, country residents are the wealthiest in the world. From 2005 through 2013, Luxembourg’s economy contracted by 2.1%, however, unlike all other countries spending the most on health care.Strong economic conditions and high health care spending help reduce health risk factors and improve medical treatments. Due in part to these improvements, the incidence of mortality from cerebrovascular diseases such as stroke in Luxembourg was reduced by roughly two-thirds since 1990. Only two other countries reported such a strong decline in mortality from cerebrovascular diseases.10. Canada• Health expenditure per capita: $4,351• Expenditure as a pct. of GDP: 10.2%• Obesity rate: 25.8%• Life expectancy: 81.5Canada’s annual health expenditure of $4,351 per capita is the 10th highest in the world. As a share of GDP, health care spending has increased steadily over the past several decades from 6.6% of total GDP in 1980 to 10.2% of GDP in 2013. This compares to an OECD average spending share of 8.9% of GDP. Increased spending in Canada has come with improved health outcomes. Average life expectancy in Canada went from 73 years in 1970 to nearly 82 years in 2013. This was not an especially large improvement compared to many other countries. However, like other wealthy countries, life expectancy in Canada has been among the highest for some time.Canada is one of a majority of OECD countries with a universal health care system. Universal insurance coverage often increases accessibility to preventative care. As a result, Canadian citizens consult a physician roughly eight times annually on average, a higher consultation rate than in all but nine other countries. Frequent doctor visits may play a role in Canadians’ perception of their own health. Though the measure is somewhat subjective, about 89% of the country’s adults consider themselves to be in good or very good health, a higher share than anywhere else in the world except for New Zealand.
Source