Hamburg court case 19.10.2022

Language
Undefined

0
No votes yet

"Hamburg court case 19.10.2022: Sensational interview with Marvin Haberland and Torsten Engelbrecht ❗️
Neither the RKI, nor the Pasteur Institute (Paris) carried out control tests. The matter is clear
At last, the first interview with defendant Marvin Haberland has been published. We at @Corona_Facts could not have wished for a more suitable person than Marvin for this task, to support him in the trial as promised. With his knowledge of the weaknesses of virology and his confident demeanour, we are sure that we can only win.
In a unique court case, Marvin Haberland wants to have it clarified whether "SARS-CoV-2" has been proven. In an interview, the engineer explains why he is focusing on the question of whether control experiments were carried out in the detection studies. By Torsten Engelbrecht
deepL tarnslate 
Source: https://t.me/Corona_Fakten/1226
-----------
 
Now it's getting serious - All or nothing❗️
We depend on your help, so we ask you to print out this information and distribute it widely in Hamburg, e.g. by handing it out personally at the Saturday demos. However, there are no limits to your imagination!
Dear HAMBURGER and all others!
Have you ever heard that the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is questioned by many scientists worldwide?
Did you know that there is no isolate in pure culture anywhere in the world, no control experiments have been carried out or documented, the genome is a purely mathematical construct that exists only virtually, and the rules of the German Research Foundation have not been observed?
No ...! Then you now have a one-time opportunity at a hearing on the
Wednesday, 19 October 2022 at 2:45 pm , at the District Court, Sievekingplatz 1 in 20355 Hamburg,courtroom 201a, 1st floor
to be present. On this day, nothing less than the question of the existence of viruses and the observance of scientific rules will be at stake.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
Our strategy is unique!
Should the judge insist that the control tests be carried out, the fraud of the lack of control tests will come to light.
Should the judge not insist, it confirms that scientificity is not required in virology.
It's a catch-22 because both decisions will collapse the scientific virus narrative.
✅ Objection and 5 motions for evidence
✅ Proof of virus existence requested
✅ Control experiments demanded
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
Lawyer support also in first instance would be desirable, please get in touch with Telegram user @Notisolate (click)
We are grateful for any support, tip and numerous audience on site. Let's use this chance together and increase the pressure on those responsible❗️
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
All documents and information about the court case( see link, source)
All details about the trial
Interview on the trial"
deepL translate:
Source:https://t.me/Corona_Fakten/1228