Language
Undefined
10
Average: 10 (1 vote)
– CCDC: A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China
– CCDC: A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019
"the two publications that are largely responsible for the Corona crisis."
google translate ,
Soutce https://telegra.ph/Analyse-aller-Publikationen-auf-einem-Blick—Warum-diese-Arbeiten-kein-pathogenes-Virus-nachweisen-02-12
Corona_FaktenFebruary 12, 2021
"Analysis of all publications at a glance – why this work does not detect a pathogenic virus"
“ This is the first article in our newly created format “Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 publications”. It is intended to shed light on the individual publications that are related to the claim that “a disease-causing virus has been detected”.
CCDC: A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2008-3
This is the first of the two publications that are largely responsible for the Corona crisis.
The first work is based ONLY on an alignment with the RNA from a patient’s lungs. No attempt at isolation was even made in this study. There was also no inoculation of a cell culture.
The following two links explain in detail what this work says, which is why we have omitted them within this article.
[1] Corona: The comprehensible and verifiable refutation of the virus claims (a review of the relevant study on SARS-CoV-2 and historical review)
[2] A big request to Prof. Ulrike Kämmerer (when and why did the misinterpretation manifest itself that a disease-causing virus had been detected and the explanation of the two studies from China that were largely responsible for the corona crisis; what was done in these publications and what informative value do they contain)
Summarized:
No virus was isolated.The necessary and scientifically compulsory control tests were not carried out. The scientific rules and guidelines were violated.The genetic strand was constructed through an alignment. This method only creates a strand of genetic material on the computer, not in reality.The cytopathic effect was not produced.Koch’s postulates were not adhered to.The fictitious and theoretical construction of the genetic strand, which was created through an alignment, then served as a template for all others worldwide.
CCDC: A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2001017
This is the second of the two publications that are largely responsible for the Corona crisis.
This publication, which published a preliminary sequence on the Internet on January 12, 2020, repeated the alignment of the first publication by Fan Wu et. al.
As if by magic, both working groups used the same harmless “bat virus” for the alignment. So they used the same template to construct a fictitious and theoretical strand of genetic material. An agreement is very obvious here. This second group (NEJM) went to great lengths to confirm the results of the first study by Prof. Zhang (Fan Wu et. Al.).
In this study, an alignment with the RNA from the lungs of patients (BALF) as well as the inoculation of a cell culture was carried out.
The authors of the study also sedimented artifacts that are output as viruses in the electron microscope without characterizing them or obtaining the nucleic acid for determining the genome.
It should be said in advance that the author of the study confirmed on request from journalist Thorsten Engelbrecht that no virus was isolated.
Answering Author: Wenjie Tan
Date: March 18, 2020
Answer: “[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones.”
It is not! Image of purified virus particles! And it’s easy to see from the illustrations. In the picture we can see that the particles that are supposed to be virus particles have not been separated from all foreign components
The authors add under “Discussion” in their study:
DISCUSSION:
“our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates”.
Please never forget that this study is one of the two main pieces of work responsible for the corona crisis, which resulted in a wave of unprecedented restrictions on quality of life and fundamental rights!
This clearly shows that this study can never be used as evidence of a new type of virus!
Since we have already analyzed this publication in detail in the two articles listed below, we will forego further lists at this point and refer to them:
[1] Corona: The comprehensible and verifiable refutation of the virus claims (a review of the relevant study on SARS-CoV-2 and historical review)
[2] A big request to Ms. Prof. Ulrike Kämmerer (When and why did the misinterpretation that a disease-causing virus had been detected and the explanation of the two studies from China, which were mainly responsible for the corona crisis, manifest. What was done in these publications and what informative value do they contain.)
Summarized:
No virus was isolated; only a cell culture was used in which a cytopathic effect was produced. This is not virus-specific.The necessary and scientifically compulsory control tests were not carried out. The scientific rules and guidelines were violated.The genetic strand was constructed through an alignment. This method only creates a strand of genetic material on the computer, not in reality.Koch’s postulates were not adhered to, as the author himself confirms in his study.