Language
English
5
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Source:
Google translate-https://projekt-immanuel.de/wenn-es-das-sars-cov-2-nicht-gibt-was-ist-dann-die-ursache-fuer-covid-19/
"If SARS-CoV-2 does not exist, what is the cause of COVID-19?
01/28/2022
That's the wrong question. The right question should be: what is COVID-19?
The short answer is: there are individual symptoms, but the "disease" COVID-19, like the virus model SARS-CoV-2, only exists on paper.
We will also deal in detail with the topic of COVID-19 and the causes of the individual symptoms in later articles.
At the beginning of the so-called corona crisis, COVID-19 was still defined as an atypical pneumonia. And even this definition was already more than problematic, because there are a number of possible causes for atypical pneumonia that have nothing to do with any pathogens.
From physical processes as a result of complex psychosomatics, which are explained in the so-called "new medicine"/"universal biology", to a number of physical-chemical causes.
The fact that conventional medicine always ignores psychosomatics and that most diseases can only be explained with supposed pathogens is one thing, but the physical-chemical causes, which also include various toxic drugs, have been well known to conventional medicine for a long time. Nevertheless, these seem to have been consistently ignored from the start.
When the PCR tests finally came along, the catalog of symptoms of COVID-19 expanded at breakneck speed, and the clinical picture developed from an atypical pneumonia to, as the RKI writes in its "Epidemiological Profile", an "unspecific spectrum of symptoms". That means COVID-19 can now be anything and nothing.
This happened because all possible symptoms that people with a positive PCR test showed were simply attributed to COVID-19 and included as an official symptom in the clinical picture. The only requirement was that the symptom could somehow be explained with the corona virus idea on a purely theoretical level, even if the explanation ended up sounding quite absurd.
For example, while a broken bone has not been linked to COVID-19 despite a positive PCR test, it has been linked to conjunctivitis, liver dysfunction, skin rash, blood poisoning, kidney failure and more.
It's worth noting that we're not making fun of people here who are in intensive care units, and maybe even dying, with severe pneumonia or other ailments. Something like that is very quickly assumed these days when you criticize the official Corona narrative. It is the supposedly "medical-scientific" definition of Corona that we are criticizing here.
When we ourselves took a closer look in July 2020 to see what COVID-19 was supposed to be officially, the clinical picture that health authorities and scientific institutes around the world had defined already included almost 30 official symptoms. In addition, there was a whole series of assumptions and "possible long-term consequences" (now also called "Long-Covid"), which, however, would first have to be "researched more closely by scientific studies" - this statement has not yet been confirmed in January 2022 changed. And of course there was also the so-called "asymptomatic course", since people without any symptoms were also tested positive in rows and, according to theory, you could now carry the virus and be contagious without getting sick yourself. At some point, people tried to redefine COVID-19 in general from a “respiratory disease” to a “vascular disease”.
How many more symptoms, theories, redefinitions and "first study results" have been added to COVID-19 since then we do not know, and it is also irrelevant.
In the history of conventional medicine there have been many times more than questionable definitions of diseases. Some of them are still valid today, such as “plague”, “cold”, “influenza” or “AIDS”. Sometimes clear symptoms of poisoning were suddenly defined as a contagious disease; then bodily processes were explained as something bad, something wrong that had to be fought; then again, the most diverse symptoms were lumped together and claimed that this was now a new disease in its own right; and finally conditions were postulated which supposedly made man frail and susceptible to disease, whereby any future ailments that arose were simply the inevitable consequence of that condition. And always the "pathogen", the malicious, invisible enemy was the cause of the whole thing.
And what is COVID-19 now?
As was made clear in the previous section, COVID-19 falls into the “throw together and relabel” category. A list was made of all the symptoms collected by the PCR tests, which can also be found in many other conventional medical disease definitions, titled it "COVID-19" and it was claimed that all the symptoms listed in this list now belong together and only be triggered by a single common cause, provided there is a positive PCR test.
So COVID-19 is just another wild hodgepodge of a wide variety of symptoms and conditions that occur in a wide variety of tissues and actually have a wide variety of causes. Not a single symptom that SARS-CoV-2 and one of its alleged variants is responsible for is in any way new or unusual.
It gets really “amusing” when you take a closer look at how the health authorities and “corona experts” tried to distinguish COVID-19 from other, similar definitions of the disease based on its symptoms. Suddenly, symptoms that every family doctor would have previously associated with banal phenomena such as a “sniffle” or a “cold” were suddenly presented as exclusive, specific COVID-19 symptoms. The same thing was done again recently in an attempt to distinguish the alleged "omicron wave" not only from the "flu" and the common "cold" but also from the previous "delta wave". Depending on the source, one then finds, for example, the assertion that loss of appetite is said to be an almost exclusive symptom of omicron, which supposedly never occurs with the flu or a cold; In addition, while flu, cold and COVID are all said to be associated with a common cold, sneezing only occurs with a cold and occasionally with new COVID variants, but never with flu. In the case of some other symptoms, it even only means that they appear more frequently or less frequently with this or that disease in the crowd...
This definition of the disease and the desperate attempt to distinguish it from other definitions of the disease on the basis of its postulated symptoms can only be described as absurd.
Imagine you went to your family doctor in 2019 with symptoms that you yourself would have interpreted as “classic flu”. He would have had you describe your symptoms, then routinely examined them and then told you that your assessment was not entirely correct. Not only would you have a sore throat and a cold, you would also have to sneeze. And sneezing is very unusual for the flu. They also reported loss of appetite as a symptom, which should normally never occur with the flu. The doctor therefore assumes that you are dealing with a new illness, which is why he would inform the health department immediately.
What would you have given to this doctor's diagnosis?
Typical phenomena such as loss of appetite or tiredness, which can be described as a standard accompaniment to countless physical complaints, as a specific symptom of only very specific diseases, is nonsensical. And even sneezing, a symptom that is of course firmly linked to a specific organ, cannot be used to make a distinction in this way. Claiming that a cold, which comes with or without a sneeze, is a sign of a certain disease only proves that all the experts who wander from talk show to talk show in the Corona period to give their expert opinion (which anyway differs every day changes), do not examine and understand the real connections between biological processes in the body at all, but only argue within the framework of a fictitious idea put on paper.
COVID-19 cannot be distinguished from other conventional medical definitions of the disease based on its symptoms! If only because countless other disease definitions are now included in COVID-19. It's all just well-known symptoms in a new, purely theoretical definition. Without PCR testing, any symptoms that appear would quickly be reassigned to the normal “flu,” “cold,” and other illnesses (most of which are defined in a similarly absurd way to COVID-19). Why was there almost no alleged "flu" in Germany in 2020 and 2021? Because they just haven't been diagnosed. The symptoms would all have been there, but since only PCR tests are now used to diagnose it, everything was just Corona.
Incidentally, this arbitrary diagnosis based on meaningless laboratory tests also includes one of the ways in which those responsible worldwide could ultimately pull themselves out of the Corona affair. The scientists "discover" e.g. an alleged new variant, in which it is found that the virus has now become harmless, which is why even positive tests very quickly become irrelevant and people stop testing. From now on, COVID will be diagnosed less and less, and all symptoms will be attributed to colds and seasonal flu again, since SARS-CoV-2, which has become harmless, can no longer be responsible. In a very similar way, the alleged swine flu of 2009 disappeared overnight.
And what about the Long-COVID cases?
Long-COVID, like the acute form of COVID-19, is nothing more than a mere assertion, which in this case is even justified with PCR tests, some of which are from a long time ago. This means that the definition of the disease in long-COVID is even broader. Here you can really say that you can pass off basically anything as a long-term consequence of COVID-19, including mental health problems.
This is what the Corona profile of the RKI says:
"So far, no uniform clinical picture can be defined and the underlying mechanisms are not yet clear. Very different symptoms are reported, which persist for weeks and months, reappear in phases or can also be new.”
We are just waiting for "cancer" to finally be included as a long-term consequence in the COVID-19 symptom catalog (or has that already happened in the meantime?). In any case, there are no longer any limits to the disease definition of COVID-19.
And one can literally take poison to the fact that all complaints that occur in society as a result of the "lockdown", "social distancing" and the irresponsible media scaremongering about corona will find their way into the long-Covid symptom catalogue.
Assembly-line diagnostics via laboratory tests have nothing to do with medicine, with science and with genuine concern for the well-being of a population. They are at most a business model. If you want to know what is going on physically in a person, you have to examine them very carefully and, above all, individually. Which symptoms appear with which intensity in which organ? What is the psychological state of the person like, what is their social environment like, what is their medical history, etc. Only then can one say what is actually wrong with a person and how one can help them.
But stop! What about the loss of smell and taste?
The notorious loss of smell and taste is very similar to atypical pneumonia. There are actually a number of possible causes, but instead of examining them more closely, they simply claim without any factual basis that the dangerous virus must be responsible.
Almost every family doctor in this and many other countries has to deal with people every year, especially in the cold winter months, who, in addition to the usual "cold symptoms", also complain that they can no longer smell and taste. On the one hand, the phenomenon is ancient and well known, on the other hand, just like with loss of appetite, tiredness and sneezing, it is nonsensical to claim that this is a specific symptom that points to a very specific disease.
At this point we recommend the article "The loss of smell and taste" by Ursula Stoll in the 03/2021 issue of Wissenschaftplus. There the author describes in detail and in a way that is easy to understand which physical processes and connections lead to the phenomenon that is considered THE significant symptom of COVID-19.
Swelling of the olfactory mucosa, which often occurs with "colds", is probably the most common cause of the temporary loss of smell and taste. Head injuries or nasal polyps can also lead to this. In addition, it has long been known that (just like atypical pneumonia) a whole range of medications can also be to blame, as well as a test stick inserted into the nose that injures the olfactory bulb.
The observation, or rather the feeling that the loss of the sense of smell and taste has occurred much more frequently since Corona than before, can be easily explained, among other things, by the fact that the focus of the population is drawn to this phenomenon. As a result, people not only notice it more quickly, it is also perceived more intensively, especially when fear is also involved.
Last but not least, the situation we are all in due to the "Corona Crisis" represents something so unique and so extremely unnatural that countless people - including the Projekt Immanuel team - are in these times Get complaints that they have never experienced in this form and intensity. This too can be explained relatively easily with complex psychosomatics, as described in universal biology, since hardly any of us have ever experienced such a long-lasting, stressful and stressful crisis.
None of what is happening in the Corona crisis in terms of diseases and physical ailments needs a pathogen and contagion to explain it.
And then what is “Flurona”?
Another absurd claim. There's nothing more to say about that.
If you understand how the COVID-19 claim came about, you can immediately understand how ideas like "Flurona", "Deltakron" and the "Twindemic" came about.
Conclusion
What will still be a very difficult and stressful chapter for some people when dealing with the whole “corona crisis” is the question: how many people ultimately died in the corona crisis for no reason.
How many people would have survived if they had only been thoroughly examined instead of just having a PCR test? How many people could easily have been helped if only they had been treated properly instead of blindly following the guidelines of a WHO or a health authority? How much damage and hardship could have been averted if people had been taken care of individually instead of being pigeonholed into generalized "disease drawers"?
In summary, there are all the symptoms attributed to COVID-19, but there is no evidence that they share a common cause. The individual symptoms are all well known and in many cases can be treated relatively easily. Once again, it is only the PCR test that defines the disease and suggests a common, contagious cause.
COVID-19 is possibly the most absurd disease definition in the history of medicine.
Your project Immanuel team"