Guardian caption: "Three business sectors -- restaurants, retail trade, and temporary help -- account for more than half of new jobs in the US.""This would be a bad situation in any case, but it is made worse by the fact that it is 100% preventable. We know how to make the economy grow more rapidly and generate jobs. But politicians are using old superstitions and deliberate lies to scare people away from the sort of fiscal stimulus that would get the economy back on track."-- economist Dean Baker, in "Upbeat June jobs report stillleaves US economy in a deep hole," for The Guardianby KenWhen Dean Baker says that a new jobs report is "somewhat better than most economists had expected," he gets my attention. But as his report on the jobs report makes all too clear, "better than expected" isn't the same thing as "good."I'm going to take the liberty of splitting the opening paragraph of his report for The Guardian down the middle, into GOOD NEWS (the first part) and BAD NEWS (the last sentence).
[GOOD NEWS]The 195,000 new jobs reported for June was somewhat better than most economists had expected. The job gains, together with upward revisions to the prior two months' data, raised average growth for the last three months to 196,000.[BAD NEWS]While this may lead some to be dancing in the streets, those who actually care about the economy may want to hold off.
"First," Dean says, "it is important to remember the size of the hole the economy is in."
We are down roughly 8.5 million jobs from our trend growth path. We also need close to 100,000 jobs a month to keep pace with the underlying growth rate of the labor market. This means that even with the relatively good growth of the last few months, we were only closing the gap at the rate of 96,000 a month. At this pace, it will take up more than seven years to fill the jobs gap.It is easy to miss the size of the jobs gap since the current 7.6% unemployment rate doesn't seem that high. However, the main reason that the unemployment rate has fallen from its peak of 10% in the fall of 2009 is that millions of people have dropped out of the labor force and stopped looking for jobs. These people are no longer counted as being unemployed.
Employment relative to population, Dean notes, is up only 0.5 percent from the bottom of the meltdown. "It is still down by more than 4.0 percentage points from its pre-recession level, and by 6.0 full percentage points from the peak hit in the boom of 2000."Once upon a time, recessions were followed by
months in which the economy created over 400,000 jobs. And this was in a labor market that was more than one-third smaller. That is the sort of job growth that we should be seeing after a recession like the one we saw in 2008-2009. Unfortunately, such growth is nowhere in sight.
"Of course," Dean says, "the weakness of the job market is not a surprise."
The economy has been growing at less than a 2% annual rate for the last three years. In this context, it is surprising that we are seeing job growth of even 100,000 a month. Most analysts put the economy's trend rate of growth in the range of 2.2-2.5%. This means that the economy has to grow at this pace just to keep the unemployment rate from rising.
The productivity growth that fueled the last economic good times (2.5 percent a year in the decade before the meltdown), has tanked to 1 percent."THIS GETS TO THE TYPE OF JOBS THATHAVE BEEN CREATED IN THE UPTURN"In a word: crappy. Okay, that's my word, not Dean's.
Over the last three months, three sectors -- restaurants, retail trade, and temporary help -- have accounted for more than half of the jobs created. These sectors offer the lowest-paying jobs, with few benefits and little job security.The fact that these sectors are growing rapidly speaks to the state of the job market. These sectors always generate lots of jobs, but in a good economy, no one will take them. Workers take these jobs when there are no better alternatives available.The poor quality of jobs shows up in the wage data. The most recent data did show an uptick in the average hourly wage, which has been rising at a nominal rate of 2.1% over the last three months. This is somewhat better than the rate of inflation, which is around 1.5%. But a closer inspection of the data shows that the uptick was all among supervisory workers, who saw nominal age growth at a 3.0% annual rate over the last three months, compared to just 1.7% for production and non-supervisory workers.
"In short," Dean sums up, "the June jobs data falls into the 'it could have been worse' category -- which is fast becoming the official slogan of the recovery."
We are seeing an economy that is likely to be well below its potential level of output for more than a decade. This means that tens of millions of people will needlessly be unemployed or underemployed.Furthermore, high levels of unemployment will put downward pressure on the wages of most of the workforce. This means that businesses and higher-end workers will continue to see the bulk of the gains of economic growth.This would be a bad situation in any case, but it is made worse by the fact that it is 100% preventable. We know how to make the economy grow more rapidly and generate jobs. But politicians are using old superstitions and deliberate lies to scare people away from the sort of fiscal stimulus that would get the economy back on track.They will try to pass off the June numbers as good news. They deserve our contempt.
Of course, there shouldn't be any surprise that what we're creating is primarily crappy jobs. This is simply a given of the modern-day "Two Americas" economy, wherein the top cohort sucks the life out of the economy, trickling down just a bit to its hanger-on tier, and leaving the rest of us screwed. High unemployment isn't a bad thing at all for those top-tier movers and shakers. On the contrary, it guarantees a defeated, we'll-take-anything and we'll-do-anything work force. To borrow the computer-software expression, unemployment turns out to be a feature, not a bug.It's a great time to be in the luxury goods-and-services business. As for the rest of us, well, somebody's got to deliver the fancy stuff, and sweep up after the swells.#