Dancing With Wolves and Thugs by Cecilia WashburnIt was leaked that Robbie Mook (former DCCC executive director) and Marlon Marshall (Obama administration) have built a pathetic listserv to “get their rocks off” to the idea that they will be controlling Clinton 2016.As Beltway losers, these two clowns love the idea that younger, less experienced staffers are sucking up to them by working social channels to be invited onto this listserv. They probably salivate to this concept while waiting for their non-existent phone call to be on a television show that would let that play arm-chair quarterback as a means of publicly auditioning for Queen Hillary.I don’t find this concept of the listserv to be the most hysterical part of this story. Pathetic, childish, and immature? Yes! But hysterical? I’ll now let you know what I find hysterical…1. The Reporting on This.Once this story broke, Beltway “journalists” (sickening that you could call these folks “journalists”) started researching this story to find more dirt at an energy that they haven’t used since trying to find juicy details on Donna Rice, a former Miss South Carolina who was photographed on a yacht with presidential candidate Gary Hart.They were able to un-earth fascinating details details on all of the operatives Clinton has met with in preparation for her 2016 debacle. Obscure names such as Michael Whouley and Jill Alper (blasts from the past) were brought to the world’s attention by these “journalists.” The last time the name Michael Whouley was seriously spoken of was when Dennis Leary was cast to play the apparently drunk, coked out Whouley in the 2007 film Recount.What the Beltway journalists failed to point out about the expert, Whouley, was that his claim to fame was publicly confusing the concept of an undervote and an over vote during the 2000 Florida recount. But details, who cares…Wouldn’t it have been nice for these Beltway journalists to put the same effort as they have in this story into stories during say, the 2014 midterms? Let’s remember, these same “journalists” continually screwed up details on important races as they were lazily listening to the DCCC and their cronies.But I guess it’s no surprise then that the DCCC operative-created listserv (the apparent skull and bones society of young, pathetic, unemployed operatives) is reason to get off their (the journalists) asses and do some digging.Those are their cronies!2. The Idea of Who Leaked this listserv to the PressI must admit, as the phone calls poured in over this major breaking news, I did start having ideas about who it was that did this Judas-like act of leaking the listserv story. My hysterical (but plausible) hypothesis is that this came from competing interests who have been invited onto this listserv.I think that there is a strong possibility that this story was leaked as a team effort by the stooges at EMILY’s List who have a vested interest in making Stephanie Schriock the campaign manager of Clinton 2016. Schriock-- an invitee of this listserv due to her time with Mook on the Dean campaign-- most likely instructed her underlings (EMILY’s List thugs from all over the country, including Hawaii where they are still eating suckling pig, mourning Colleen Hanabusa’s political demise) to leak this story.It truly does paint the “Mook-Mafia’s” major domos (Mook and Marshall) as arrogant, idiotic fools and paints the picture that if these boys can’t control their own secret society, how will they control Bill and Hillary on the trail?My gut is that Schriock is so desperate because she knows she is out of the running. My sources tell me that the wrap on Schriock in the Beltway is that she doesn’t have the relationship with Bill Clinton necessary for any potential Clinton campaign manager.The other idea is that the 3rd public contender—former DSCC ED-- Guy Cecil leaked this as a means of stabbing his competitors in the heart. In fairness to Guy, while his organization was dealt a horrible election night, he is known to be a shrewd operative who can play the game well. Maybe Rick Weiland or Shenna Bellows will have something to say about this idea…So, at the end of the day, who manages Clinton 2016?If Hillary has learned her lessons-- which I think she may have-- she will hire capable operatives who don’t appear at the high ranks of organizations like the “Mook-Mafia” or EMILY’s List, which lost almost every race they touched this year, some spectacularly, like Martha Coakley's, Hanabusa's, Michelle Nunn's, Wendy Greuel's, Wendy Davis', Emily Cain's, and Alex Sink's.What she should-- and probably will-- do is hire someone who has managed multiple competitive Senate races successfully and has stayed out of the disgusting, pathetic, Beltway limelight. This would be unfortunate, though, for Beltway “journalists” who are waiting desperately for their buddies to have the inside track in Hillaryland so that they can continue their lazy, pathetic tendencies of being paid to do nothing-- and then report!UPDATE: Backstabbing In Hillaryland AlreadyThis morning, writing for Mother Jones, Andy Kroll was shaking his head at the backstabbing and infighting coming out of the pathetic Democratic Beltway operative Hillary is supposedly looking at to help her campaign. Here we go again.
The real news isn't that Mook and Marshall had a listserv for fellow Democratic operatives. It's that someone on the listserv leaked its contents in an effort to hurt Mook's chances of becoming the manager of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. In other words, the Clinton '16 effort has yet to officially launch and already the backstabbing and infighting has begun.It's shades of Hillary '08 all over again.Internal battles notoriously plagued Clinton's first presidential run. A Washington Post story in March 2008 described the "combustible environment within the Clinton campaign, an operation where internal strife and warring camps have undercut a candidate once seemingly destined for the Democratic nomination."...The strategic leaking of Mook's and Marshall's listserv emails wouldn't have been at all out of place during Clinton's '08 campaign, as her aides bickered and backstabbed their way to defeat against a more cohesive-- or at least functional-- Obama campaign.