In a superb video (attached below), Dr. Daniela Reich, an Israeli academic who specialises in ‘Israeli studies’ elaborates on her research into ‘Jewess / Goyim’ relationships within the context of pre 1948 Palestine.
The video points at two conflicting factors within the emerging pre-Israeli Hebraic society:
1. The Formal and conscious institutionalized utilization of young Jewish women to ‘befriend’ British Mandatory forces to promote the Zionist project and to collect intelligence.
2. A brutal harassment campaign against young women caught dating British mandatory soldiers and officers.
As usual, the Jewish anti Zionist ‘dissidents’ are very effective in providing juicy historical and factual anecdotes; yet, the nature of the culture that drives such phenomenon is left untouched and even concealed. Within the idiom of Jewish Left anti Zionist discourse, we are asked to condemn the symptoms but never to examine the disease. In this invaluable video, made by Israeli peace activist David Sheen, the Jewish culture and heritage that provoked such horrendous behavior toward women is left untouched. Interestingly, the video stops abruptly as soon as Dr Reich mentions the ‘J’ word.
I will briefly elaborate on the dialectics between female tribal utilization and deep Goy-hatred that are both embedded within Jewish culture.
From a Jewish tribal perspective, utilizing Jewish women and their charms to serve the Jewish cause is totally kosher. For many Jews, one of the most fascinating Biblical stories, that is also popular amongst feminists and LGBT enthusiasts, is the story of Queen Esther.
Esther was queen to King Ahasuerus of Persia. When her nation, Israel, was in danger of being wiped out (The Book Of Esther 3:13), Mordecai warned Esther, “Do not think to yourself that in the king’s palace you will escape any more than all the other Jews. For if you keep silent at this time, relief and deliverance will rise for the Jews from another place, but you and your father’s house will perish.” (Esther 4:13-14). Queen Esther was quick to react. She went before the King, she played her magic – the Jews were saved and the enemies of Israel were slaughtered in a mass genocide. The Book Of Ester became Purim – the most joyous Jewish Festival. Obviously Queen Esther slept with a Goy, but we have yet to hear of a Rabbi who condemns her act of ‘miscegenation.” Monica Lewinsky received similar treatment. Jews did not harass her for storing Presidential semen on her dress. President Clinton was pressuring Israel at the time, and the ‘Lewinsky affair’ was apparently ‘good for the Jews.’
Interestingly, in the entire Book Of Esther, God isn’t ever mentioned. I somehow think that Lewinsky also didn’t appeal to ‘divine intervention’ in order to squeeze a bit of evidence out of the President. Esther, like Lewinsky, embodies the anthropocentric Jewish revolution, for in the Book of Esther, the Jews save themselves, or more accurately, are saved by the unique charm of their Jewesses.
Though some would rightly argue that women are discriminated against and oppressed within Rabbinical Judaism; Zionism, at least at its early stage, was driven by a rejection of rabbinical culture. Zionism promised to eradicate the old Jew and bring about a new ethical Hebraic character and form a new Israelite culture that would reinstate the spirit of the Bible. For the New Israelites, Queen Esther and Judge Deborah (the female prophet warrior) were inspirational. Considering the deep socialist ideology of pre-1948 Zionism, the above utilization of young women in Palestine’s cause is not surprising. It is consistent with the Hebrew Bible.
But then Reich reveals the story of the brutal and harsh Jewish campaign against those young Jewish women caught in romantic affairs with British soldiers and officers. I don’t question Reich’s narrative, but was it really Jewish racism and supremacy that led this campaign?
Goy-hatred is deeply embedded in every form of Jewish culture and politics. Read the recent interview by Max Blumenthal and his view on “German pathology” for a lesson in the vile Jewish hatred of gentiles that is deeply rooted in Jewish Progressive and secular thought. Earlier this week, musician and precious commentator Jonathan Azaziah, revealed that the ‘progressive’ Board of the pro Palestinian JVP (Jewish Voice for Peace) is made up of 27 Jews. Another unique form of self imposed Jewish segregation. They might be embarrassed to admit that the Israeli Knesset is far more ethnically and culturally diverse than the leading ‘progressive’ Jewish pro Palestinian community.
The Jewish State is a racist state and probably the most racist State around. Its racism is a direct product of its Jewishness, because Jewishness is an ethno-centric exclusive racist concept. And although Jews are not a race and do not form a racial continuum, Jewish politics and culture are racist to the core. Acknowledgement of this obvious phenomenon is what is missing in Jewish progressive activism and Kosher Left thought. Instead of confronting the racism embedded in every form of Jewish ideology, culture and politics, Jewish ‘dissenters’ attempt to set the boundaries of the discourse in a concerted attempt to conceal their own racism and the Jewish culture that drives Jewish politics.
In the video, Dr Reich refers to “The Sons of Phineas” and their violent campaign against the daughters of Israel who fell for the young Brits. I guess that Dr. Reich didn’t bother to examine the Biblical reference to Phineas. Was it a racial segregation that motivated the Sons of Phineas in the 1940’s to murder Jewish lasses or to cut their hair? I am not so sure.
In the Hebrew Bible, Phineas was displeased with the ‘immorality,’ which the Midianites had inflicted on Phineas’ people. He was disturbed by the weakening of family values and the tribal bond. Upon encountering one of the Israelite leaders coupled with a Midianite woman, Phineas decided to act – he executed them both while they were engaged in the act of lovemaking. Biblical Phineas was commended for having stopped Israel’s fall to idolatry. But was Phineas a racist? Similarly were The Sons of Phineas racists? Not necessarily.
The Sons of Phineas were affiliated with the Irgun and the Stern Gang. Both para military Jewish terror organizations regarded the British mandate as an occupation force (as if these new Jewish immigrants were themselves the indigenous people of theland). Both the Irgun and the Stern Gang saw themselves as an anti colonial rebels. The Sons of Phineas punished Jewish girls for sleeping with those whom they regarded as an occupying force. But were French resistance fighters who targeted French women who dated Germans racist? Would we accuse a Palestinian of racism if he happens to punish a boy from his village for being caught in bed with an Israeli soldier?
The 1940s Sons Of Phineas activity is somewhat different than the current Israeli hatred of Africans and Arabs or than Jewish Left Judeo exclusivism. It is likely that the Sons of Phineas saw themselves primarily, as anti colonial insurgents. As such, the reference made by David Sheen to ‘miscegenation’ is perhaps misleading or anachronistic. However, this testimony by Reich is another crucial contribution towards the understanding of Jewish identity, culture and politics and the threat that this ID politics poses to humanity and humanism.