Visit ArabTopics.com

Why politicians don’t, and can’t, understand the Internet

political-cluelessness-1280x720-istockphotp

Politicians do not understand the Internet. It is not so much that the politicians in power today in their 60s weren’t born with it, even if that’s also true. It’s more that politicians as a profession are institutionally incapable of understanding it, just because it functions without – even despite – political interference.

Businesspeople are not much better in this regard. Where politicians understand power in terms of what they can regulate, businesspeople understand power in terms of ownership. But the Internet is neither; it cannot be owned nor regulated. As pointed out succinctly by Searls and Weinberger, the Internet is an agreement. It is a technical agreement between billions of people how to get a packet of data from point A to point B, where no point is worth more than any other.

In this, the Internet is best understood like a language, shared by billions. While there are certainly those who try to describe languages with authority, and publish dictionaries that some follow to the letter, at the end of the day, users of a language speak however they want, regardless of any attempts to correct them or make them do otherwise. In this, a language is an agreement between millions or billions of people, and no regulation is going to change the agreement; no governmental threat of force against any person or group of persons is going to change the meaning of a word, and no user of a language has more power over it than any other user, except by voluntary following from other users of the language, voluntary being the key word.

To understand how this contrasts utterly and completely with the worldview of a politician, we need to look at some specific present-day cases where they have been, and are, involved. Let’s take autonomous cars, autonomous delivery drones, and Hyperloop constructions.

In each of these cases, long-term planning is required to first relax the present regulations enough to allow for trials of autonomous vehicles (on road, in air, and on new rail), land zoning may be required for air and rail, investments must happen in cooperation with banking or rich companies, after which trials can proceed, and political committees can evaluate the results against some sort of safety criteria established by experts which is added to the value systems of the politicians in charge. Once the results are evaluated, the politicians may allow – allow! – mass market adoption of the new, disruptive technology. This is the worldview of a politician, this is how everything they know has come into being.

Now, compare this with the Internet, where no politicians at all were involved in its coming into being, with the possible exception of Al Gore. Politicians who are used to cooperating with state-owned, state-controlled, or at the very least state-subsidized media are finding themselves circumvented by something they didn’t allow, something that just emerged.

This is why I’m getting questions from most politicians, when I claim fiber is a necessity, why “this download speed is not enough”. For users of a language, it’s not enough to be able to listen; you must also be able to talk. One of the fantastic things about the Internet’s good connections is that download is on equal footing with upload — nobody’s a consumer, everybody’s an equal participant. Politicians absolutely do not get this, and therefore, good connections (where upload speed is equal to download speed) are still rare, even in 2017.

Everything exists only on the edges. There is no center point. There is no bottleneck. From a regulation standpoint, there is no chokepoint which can be regulated. “The Internet interprets censorship as [technical] damage to the network and routes around it.” In this context, “censorship” is any undesired regulation.

I could think of only one Internet regulation necessary at the moment, and that’s net neutrality. Still, even that is regulation only necessary to patch up previous bad regulation – a lack of competition in the telecommunications market – and one needs to be very careful to avoid so-called regulatory capture, where telco insiders take over the agency regulating them through a selection of means. (Wouldn’t it be better if you just had a selection of two dozen service providers? Bad actors like Comcast would be dumped like a bad habit.)

It’s therefore important to realize that the need for net neutrality regulation is a consequence of the telecommunications industry having been created through the political regulatory process described above. Where there are internet service providers who are not also telecom providers, where internet entrepreneurs leapfrogged the entire telecom industry and don’t have last-century luggage, the concept of net neutrality is an absolute no-brainer. (“It’s the whole service and the entire point of the service, why would we want to sell a substandard service?”.) In contrast, the telecom industry will be utterly disintegrated by the Internet — who would want to pay by the minute for 9.6 kilobits-per-second of bandwidth that can only be used with one mediocre voice application, when you have 100 general-purpose flatrate megabits-per-second in the wall? — and so, the telecom industry has every strategic incentive to delay and prevent the utility of the Internet.

Privacy remains your own responsibility, especially in the face of clueless politicians.

Syndicated Article
This article was previously published at Private Internet Access.

(This is a post from Falkvinge on Liberty, obtained via RSS at this feed.)

Source: 
Rick Falkvinge

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
WWI Hidden History 50
Grayzone Project 78
Pass Blue 149
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 14
John Pilger 416
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 2230
FEE 4139
Marine Le Pen 288
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 772
Mohamed Omar 321
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 40
Angry Foreigner 18
Fritte Fritzson 12
Teologiska rummet 32
Filosofiska rummet 94
Vetenskapsradion Historia 143
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 203
Les Crises 2459
Richard Falk 147
Ian Sinclair 95
SpinWatch 57
Counter Currents 8130
Kafila 410
Gail Malone 34
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 94
The Duran 9139
Vanessa Beeley 93
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 5413
Paul Craig Roberts 1525
News Junkie Post 58
Nomi Prins 27
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 4389
Sir Ken Robinson 20
Stephan Kinsella 85
Liberty Blitzkrieg 836
Sami Bedouin 62
Consortium News 2422
21 Century Wire 3334
Burning Blogger 323
Stephen Gowans 80
David D. Friedman 149
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1500
Tom Dispatch 478
Levant Report 18
The Saker 3970
The Barnes Review 507
John Friend 422
Psyche Truth 146
Jonathan Cook 135
New Eastern Outlook 3627
School Sucks Project 1760
Giza Death Star 1772
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 593
GMWatch 2104
Robert Faurisson 150
Espionage History Archive 34
Jay's Analysis 882
Le 4ème singe 89
Jacob Cohen 206
Agora Vox 13896
Cercle Des Volontaires 429
Panamza 1976
Fairewinds 111
Project Censored 907
Spy Culture 464
Conspiracy Archive 75
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 536
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 741
Independent Science News 71
The Anti Media 6288
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 279
The Mind renewed 438
Natural Society 2573
Yanis Varoufakis 918
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 100
Web of Debt 138
Porkins Policy Review 393
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 583
Libyan War Truth 310
DeadLine Live 1909
Kevin Ryan 62
BSNEWS 2031
Aaron Franz 214
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 121
Dr. Bruce Levine 138
Peter B Collins 1482
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 10210
Climate Audit 222
Donna Laframboise 406
Judith Curry 1105
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2221
Syria Report 78
Human Rights Investigation 90
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 11166
Laura Wells Solutions 41
Video Rebel's Blog 422
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 19367
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 2874
Northerntruthseeker 2256
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4694
AntiWar.com Blog 2906
AntiWar.com Original Content 6608
Corbett Report 2243
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1155
Webster Tarpley Website 1051

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public