When California's most rabidly homophobic state Senator, Roy Ashburn (R-Bakersfield) was arrested for drunken driving and discovered with a young male prostitute in his car, I was impressed with how quickly he came to terms with how disastrous his life in the closet had been.
Something happened that I guess caused me to realize that. When I was in sixth grade, the police had a raid in the sand dunes [near San Luis Obispo] and a bunch of gay men were arrested, probably charged with indecent activity. That sticks in my mind — the publicity and the shame around it. One of my teachers was one of the people. The talk among the kids, the talk among the adults, the talk in the community, the press — at that time the choice was pretty clear: If you were gay and open, it was a life of shame, ridicule, innuendo about molesting and perversion. It was a dark life. Given that choice of whether you come out or whether you're in secret, I mean, there really wasn't a choice....The best I can do is to say that I was hiding. I was so in terror I could not allow any attention to come my way. So any measure that had to do with the subject of sexual orientation was an automatic "no" vote. I was paralyzed by this fear, and so I voted without even looking at the content. The purpose of government is to protect the rights of people under the law, regardless of our skin color, national origin, our height, our weight, our sexual orientation. This is a nation predicated on the belief that there is no discrimination on those characteristics, and so my vote denied people equal treatment, and I'm truly sorry for that.
Not every Republican who forced the Senate to strip LGBT couple out of the comprehensive immigration bill this week is a closet case. But self-loather Lindsey Graham is. "Everyone" in Washington knows he is but he's allowed to get away with threatening to scuttle the whole bill if it includes gays like himself. Last week former GOP congressman Jim Kolbe (R-AZ) married his boyfriend. Because of DOMA-- which he voted for while still closeted-- he won't be able to sponsor his new Panamanian husband's residence permit in the U.S. Lindsey Graham will have his painful day of reckoning as well.Jerry Nadler (D-NY), who first introduced the Permanent Partners Immigration Act, in the year 2000 and has re-introduced a version of LGBT immigration equality legislation in each subsequent Congress, was dismayed that the Senate scuttled his legislation.
As the House sponsor of the Uniting American Families Act (UAFA), I am extremely disappointed that an amendment to ensure equal treatment for same-sex, bi-national couples was withheld, without a vote, during the Senate Judiciary Committee consideration of the immigration reform legislation. I applaud the leadership of Chairman Leahy, who was determined to–and did–offer an amendment that would allow LGBT families to stay together. Unfortunately, Senate Republicans made clear that they are unwilling to even consider ending the harsh discrimination that LGBT families face in our immigration process, and the disturbing decision to give in to their threats and fear-mongering has again let prejudice rule the day. Excluding LGBT couples cannot be reconciled with so-called “comprehensive” immigration reform. Committed LGBT couples deserve better than the wanton cruelty that current law exacts, and the failure to even hold a vote both condemns thousands of loving families to more needless suffering and gives unfair cover to those unwilling to stand up for justice. Despite this setback, I will continue to press forward in our fight to get relief for these families. And I remain hopeful that the Supreme Court will do what’s right in the Windsor case, by overturning DOMA, and ending discrimination under federal immigration and other laws against legally married same-sex couples.
Leahy is expected to reintroduce the LGBT amendment again while the immigration bill is on the Senate floor, so that Lindsey Graham hysteria won't scuttle it. If Miss McConnell, another deranged closet case, decides to lead a filibuster-- which is likely-- it won't get a vote. But in a straight up or down vote, it would easily win, with several Republicans crossing the aisle. Many non-Southern Republicans would prefer not to be forced into voting on the issue. A large and growing majority of non-Southerners backs equality for the LGBT community. If the Republicans use the immigration bill as a hostage against gays, the Republicans who are the most likely to suffer next year are not rotten closet cases Graham and McConnell-- who represent anti-equality states-- but... no one. It's not likely that a single GOP senator will lose in 2014 because of homophobia (unless Graham and McConnell get into some kind of Larry Craig- or Mark Foley-like scandal) but it further damages the Republican brand and could help persuade independent and moderate voters in close House elections to give up on their GOP incumbents, particularly these 15 seats in areas where people are not interested in legislating bigotry:
• Michelle Bachmann (R-MN)• Paul Ryan (R-WI)• Buck McKeon (R-CA)• Tom Reed (R-NY)• Michael "Mikey Suits" Grimm (R-NY)• Joe Heck (R-NV)• Jon Runyan (R-NJ)• John Kline (R-MN)• Fred Upton (R-MI)• Jeff Denham (R-CA)• Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL)• Jim Gerlach (R-PA)• Tom Latham (R-IA)• Mike Coffman (R-CO)• Chris Gibson (R-NY)
Ironically, in Gibson's case, the opponent likely to beat him next year is Sean Eldridge, a wealthy venture capitalist married to Facebook founder Chris Hughes. Money won't be an issue.