On December 19 Hillary Clinton can be elected PresidentThe real threat to Trump comes from the vote in the Electoral College December 19, not from recounts. Electors are free to vote for Hillary, even if Trump won the state.Media continue to pressure members of the Electoral College to dump Trump and elect HillaryIndividual electors are being harassed to change their voteThe Clintonistas (and major US media) suggest the election was rigged by Russia: “This election cycle was unique in the degree of foreign interference witnessed throughout the campaign: the U.S. government concluded that Russian state actors were behind the hacks of the Democratic National Committee and the personal email accounts of Hillary for America campaign officials…” — Clinton staffer Marc Elias From FactCheck.org: It is true, as the National Archives and Records Administration notes, that there is “no Constitutional provision or Federal law that requires Electors to vote according to the results of the popular vote in their states.”Presidential Electors are theoretically free to vote as their consciences dictate, something the founders anticipated Electors would indeed do under Hamilton’s Electoral College invention,” Laurence Tribe, a professor of constitutional law at Harvard Law School, told us via email.Tribe said the constitutionality of imposing a fine on a “faithless elector” is “open to doubt, and it is even more doubtful that a court would compel any Elector to be ‘faithful’ to the State’s winner-take-all outcome. Nor is it likely that the Vice President, who presides over the process of opening the Electors’ ballots and counting the votes cast by the 538 Electors, would feel free to ‘correct’ a faithless Elector’s vote. So, in theory, if enough Electors pledged to Mr. Trump decline to make him President-elect and vote instead for Secretary Clinton, she would become the President-elect and would be the 45th President upon taking the Oath of Office on January 20, 2017.”Other News You May Have MissedHypocrisy at Work:Blasphemy law in Islam and in the secular WestThe mainstream media in the West continue to hammer Islam for fostering blasphemy laws whereby people are jailed or otherwise punished for blaspheming a sacred Muslim dogma. Attention Muslims: In a Paris criminal court on Nov. 23, elderly Prof. Robert Faurisson was fined 10,000 euros or 100 days in jail for a television interview in which he blasphemed the sacred dogma of Auschwitz execution gas chambers. Concerning the blasphemy law in Zionist France and the latest repression against Dr. Faurisson, the mainstream media and “human rights” pressure groups in the West are mostly completely silent.• Fidel Castro and the Church of Rome: He was trained by Jesuits and his guerrilla army had a chaplain approved by Pope John XXIII• Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), bane of Neocon warmongers and recently hosted by Trump. Inside the battle for the soul of Trump's foreign policy• Wall Street urges Obama to pardon imprisoned Kosher-slaughter sadist Sholom RubashkinActivism: In your letters to the editor and calls to talk shows ask why only alleged Russian “interference” in the recent election is being highlighted. Mention that most of the mainstream media are assets of the Israeli government, and Zionist-American billionaires such as Sheldon Adelson attempt to buy U.S. elections on behalf of the Israeli government. Congress is occupied Israeli territory and so too are the major American media who scapegoat Russia.This news service is made possible by donations from truthseekers and the purchase of our publications and recordings.We like to hear from you, and while we can’t answer every e-mail, we do read them. Let us know how we’re doing: hoffman(AT)revisionisthistory.org _______________
Source