Visit ArabTopics.com

Court: Texas Intentionally Redrew Voting Districts To Dilute Minority Votes

 (Anneke Paterson/Todd Wiseman/The Texas Tribune)

Illustration: (Anneke Paterson/Todd Wiseman/The Texas Tribune)

Texas lawmakers intentionally diluted the political clout of minority voters in drawing the state’s House districts, a panel of federal judges ruled Thursday.

In a long-awaited ruling, the San Antonio-based panel found that lawmakers in 2011 either violated the U.S. Constitution or the Voting Rights Act by intentionally diluting the strength of minority voters statewide and specifically in a litany of House districts across Texas. Those districts encompass areas including El Paso, Bexar, Nueces, Harris, Dallas and Bell counties.

“The impact of the plan was certainly to reduce minority voting opportunity statewide, resulting in even less proportional representation for minority voters,” U.S. District Judges Orlando Garcia and Xavier Rodriguez wrote in a majority opinion, adding that map-drawers’ discussions “demonstrated a hostility” toward creating minority-controlled districts despite their massive population growth.

In some instances, the judges ruled, map-drawers’ use of race to configure some districts to comply with the Voting Rights Act instead “turned the VRA on its head.”

“Instead of using race to provide equal electoral opportunity, they intentionally used it to undermine Latino voting opportunity,” they added.

The court also sided with plaintiffs on the issue of improper racial gerrymandering in Bexar County and violations of the one person, one vote rule — which requires districts to be drawn with roughly equal populations — in the drawing of nine House districts in Nueces, Hidalgo, Bell and Lampasas counties.

The 2-1 ruling came one month after the same court found intentional discrimination in the drawing of three Texas congressional districts. Like that ruling, however, the judges did not offer a remedy for the violations — leaving open the question of how the ruling will affect House races in 2018. Last week, a Corpus Christi-based judge again found intentional discrimination in the state’s 2011 voter ID law.

In a dissenting opinion, Judge Jerry Smith of the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals called the majority’s findings “fatally infected, from start to finish, with the misunderstanding that race, rather than partisan advantage,” was behind the state maps.

“Despite its heartfelt efforts, this panel majority has badly overreached in finding that Texas used race, instead of partisan advantage, as the predominant factor in the 2011 redistricting,” Smith wrote, seemingly welcoming an appeal of the ruling by ending his dissent with a final quip: “Stay tuned.”

In a statement, the Texas attorney general’s office said it respectfully disagreed with the ruling.

“As Fifth Circuit Judge Jerry Smith observed in his dissent, the challenge to the old 2011 maps are not only moot but ‘a finding that racial considerations were dominant and controlling defies everything about this record,'” the statement said. “Accordingly, we are confident we will ultimately prevail in this case.”

Thursday’s ruling hit in the final stretch of the 2017 legislative session, scheduled to wrap up at the end of May. But because the court did not immediately order that a new map be drawn, it is unclear whether lawmakers will be forced to take action before they leave Austin. And it follows a March ruling that found lawmakers intentionally discriminated in drawing three of the state’s 36 congressional districts. The courts have already settled squabbles over the state Senate map.

The state’s Republican-controlled Legislature has proved reluctant to discuss such issues. The House Committee on Redistricting, for instance, has not met since 2013 — despite calls from Democrats on the panel to discuss the March ruling and hold hearings on seven redistricting-related bills that have been referred to the committee.

The committee’s chairwoman, Rep. Cindy Burkett, R-Sunnyvale, has refused to say whether she will call a hearing. “We’re just monitoring” the court proceedings, Burkett told The Texas Tribune this month, noting the lack of direction from the court.

House Speaker Joe Straus’ office — which oversaw the 2011 map-drawing — did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the ruling.

Meanwhile, the Democrats who challenged the statehouse map in court celebrated Thursday’s ruling as a vindication for communities of color in the state.

“This is yet another example of political discrimination by the State of Texas against minority voters,” state Rep. Rafael Anchia of Dallas, chairman of the Mexican American Legislative Caucus, said in a statement. “Thousands of minority voters are being denied their right to an equal opportunity to choose their elected representatives, just to preserve the party in power.”

Attorneys in the redistricting battle are scheduled to return to court on April 27 for a status conference on the congressional case. They will debate several issues, including a timeline and roadmap for any fixes the courts require.


This work by --- is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.This work by The Texas Tribune is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 International License.

 

The post Court: Texas Intentionally Redrew Voting Districts To Dilute Minority Votes appeared first on MintPress News.

Source: 
MintPress

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
The Real News 59
Scrutinised Minds 11
Need To Know News 234
FEE 773
Marine Le Pen 92
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 50
HAX on 5July 197
Henrik Alexandersson 301
Mohamed Omar 84
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 34
Angry Foreigner 13
Fritte Fritzson 11
Teologiska rummet 25
Filosofiska rummet 31
Vetenskapsradion Historia 43
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 122
Les Crises 502
Richard Falk 36
Ian Sinclair 32
SpinWatch 21
Counter Currents 1640
Kafila 168
Gail Malone 21
Transnational Foundation 141
Rick Falkvinge 46
The Duran 2797
Vanessa Beeley 65
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 1903
Paul Craig Roberts 446
News Junkie Post 36
Nomi Prins 13
Kurt Nimmo 189
Strategic Culture 1271
Sir Ken Robinson 12
Stephan Kinsella 25
Liberty Blitzkrieg 593
Sami Bedouin 59
Consortium News 1363
21 Century Wire 1909
Burning Blogger 213
Stephen Gowans 44
David D. Friedman 95
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1168
Tom Dispatch 239
Levant Report 17
The Saker 2016
The Barnes Review 318
John Friend 260
Psyche Truth 137
Jonathan Cook 112
New Eastern Outlook 1994
School Sucks Project 1041
Giza Death Star 934
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 498
GMWatch 1091
Robert Faurisson 100
Espionage History Archive 33
Jay's Analysis 455
Le 4ème singe 62
Jacob Cohen 139
Agora Vox 4772
Cercle Des Volontaires 324
Panamza 918
Fairewinds 92
Project Censored 460
Spy Culture 223
Conspiracy Archive 49
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 260
PINAC 1327
The Conscious Resistance 368
Independent Science News 50
The Anti Media 3407
Positive News 644
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 47
Lionel 224
The Mind renewed 179
Natural Society 2291
Yanis Varoufakis 543
Tragedy & Hope 102
Dr. Tim Ball 50
Web of Debt 105
Porkins Policy Review 222
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 477
Libyan War Truth 235
DeadLine Live 1828
Kevin Ryan 54
BSNEWS 1714
Aaron Franz 145
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 101
Dr. Bruce Levine 89
Peter B Collins 988
Faux Capitalism 197
Dissident Voice 7444
Climate Audit 193
Donna Laframboise 232
Judith Curry 946
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 1382
Newsbud 2038
Syria Report 70
Human Rights Investigation 81
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 7416
Laura Wells Solutions 15
Video Rebel's Blog 390
Revisionist Review 446
Aletho News 13679
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 2073
Northerntruthseeker 1560
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4332
AntiWar.com Blog 2066
AntiWar.com Original Content 4769
Corbett Report 1693
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 945
Webster Tarpley Website 619

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public