Visit ArabTopics.com

Why the New York Times Editorial Opposing Military Intervention in Venezuela May Do More Harm Than Good

There is a growing body of pro-establishment statements opposing the possibility of U.S. military intervention in Venezuela. The latest expression of this position is a New York Times editorial titled “Stay Out of Venezuela, Mr. Trump” published on September 11. At first glance, the editorial is a welcomed statement that counters the careless war-mongering declarations coming from the ilk of Marco Rubio and a number of high-ranking Trump administration officials as well as Trump himself.

Certainly, one must applaud the NY Times’ decision to come out in opposition to military intervention, and its recognition that similar intervention and support for regime change in Latin America historically (the editorial even makes reference to the Brazilian coup of 1964) as well as elsewhere in the world has had disastrous consequences.

The line of reasoning of the New York Times’ editorial overlaps that of other articles that have come out recently in the establishment media such as one titled “U.S. Military Intervention in Venezuela would be a Major Mistake” by Robert Moore published the following day in “The Hill” as well as the position of the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA). The anti-war stand crosses party lines as Moore has served Republican senators including Tea Party Republican Jim DeMint.

One hint regarding the limitations of this new position is the subtitle of the NY Times’ editorial: “President Maduro has to Go, but an American Backed Coup is not the Answer.” The way the article frames the issue is what makes it worrisome. The New York Times does not question the right of the U.S. as a nation (as opposed to the UN) to promote regime change. All it says is that a more intelligent approach to getting rid of Maduro is what is called for. As an alternative to military intervention, Trump’s pro-establishment critics call for increased sanctions.

New York Times. Stay Out of Venezuela Mr. Trump

WOLA, for instance, criticizes the Trump administration for increasing the number of Chavistas who are being sanctioned, rather than concentrating on a smaller number of leading Chavistas and increasing the penalties against them. In fact, the issue of sanctions against individuals serves as a cover for the financial embargo which has inflicted considerable harm on Venezuela, as even Reuters recognizes.

A valid question is why the New York Times has waited until now to adamantly oppose military intervention. After all, the then Secretary of State Rex Tillerson raised the possibility of a military solution as far back as February of this year when he kicked off his six-day Latin American tour in Austin where he stated “In the history of Venezuela and South American countries, it is often times that the military is the agent of change when things are so bad and the leadership can no longer serve the people.” The statement was a trial balloon. Trump pushed the idea in subsequent months but the response from right-wing and conservative governments was negative. Countries which form part of the Lima Group rejected the military option and distanced themselves from Washington by supporting Mexico in its differences with the U.S. on tariffs and NAFTA.

The New York Times saw the handwriting on the wall and realized that military intervention would not count on the support of Latin American governments, in spite of their hostility to the Maduro government. The intervention that Trump proposed would be truly unilateral (unlike current military intervention in the Middle East) as Latin American governments would be unwilling to pay the inevitably high political price for supporting a U.S. invasion in the region.

Given these circumstances, coupled with Trump’s lack of political capital, a military invasion is unlikely. Talk of it may be designed to encourage dissension and unrest within the Venezuelan military. The strategy is that by threatening military action, members of the Venezuelan armed forces may put up resistance to Maduro out of the prospect of having to risk their lives in a confrontation against the world’s greatest military superpower.

In any case, if the central argument of the New York Times and other members of the “liberal” establishment is that Trump should focus on economic sanctions rather than a military solution, then they are undoubtedly doing more harm than good.

Top Photo | A sign with an image representing U.S. President Donald Trump and a text that reads in Spanish “Trump, what a crazy critter!” hangs from a bridge in Caracas, Venezuela, March 8, 2018. Fernando Llano | AP

Steve Ellner is a Participating Editor of Latin American Perspectives and is the coordinator of that journal’s January 2019 issue that will be titled “Latin America’s Progressive Governments: Separating Socio-Economic Breakthroughs and Shortcomings.”

Source | VenezualaAnalysis.com

The post Why the New York Times Editorial Opposing Military Intervention in Venezuela May Do More Harm Than Good appeared first on MintPress News.

Source: 
MintPress

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
WWI Hidden History 50
Grayzone Project 49
Pass Blue 121
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 14
John Pilger 413
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 2084
FEE 3864
Marine Le Pen 286
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 700
Mohamed Omar 294
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 39
Angry Foreigner 17
Fritte Fritzson 12
Teologiska rummet 32
Filosofiska rummet 87
Vetenskapsradion Historia 135
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 195
Les Crises 2290
Richard Falk 138
Ian Sinclair 88
SpinWatch 54
Counter Currents 7552
Kafila 403
Gail Malone 34
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 94
The Duran 8220
Vanessa Beeley 93
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 5251
Paul Craig Roberts 1388
News Junkie Post 56
Nomi Prins 26
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 4144
Sir Ken Robinson 20
Stephan Kinsella 77
Liberty Blitzkrieg 823
Sami Bedouin 62
Consortium News 2324
21 Century Wire 3203
Burning Blogger 312
Stephen Gowans 74
David D. Friedman 147
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1491
Tom Dispatch 454
Levant Report 17
The Saker 3804
The Barnes Review 497
John Friend 397
Psyche Truth 146
Jonathan Cook 135
New Eastern Outlook 3476
School Sucks Project 1752
Giza Death Star 1702
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 582
GMWatch 2014
Robert Faurisson 150
Espionage History Archive 34
Jay's Analysis 833
Le 4ème singe 88
Jacob Cohen 202
Agora Vox 13064
Cercle Des Volontaires 426
Panamza 1889
Fairewinds 105
Project Censored 786
Spy Culture 430
Conspiracy Archive 68
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 521
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 674
Independent Science News 70
The Anti Media 6064
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 272
The Mind renewed 218
Natural Society 2563
Yanis Varoufakis 879
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 79
Web of Debt 135
Porkins Policy Review 378
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 576
Libyan War Truth 302
DeadLine Live 1908
Kevin Ryan 62
BSNEWS 2008
Aaron Franz 206
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 121
Dr. Bruce Levine 129
Peter B Collins 1431
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 9999
Climate Audit 222
Donna Laframboise 391
Judith Curry 1086
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2152
Syria Report 76
Human Rights Investigation 90
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 10859
Laura Wells Solutions 38
Video Rebel's Blog 420
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 18934
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 2813
Northerntruthseeker 2178
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4684
AntiWar.com Blog 2843
AntiWar.com Original Content 6480
Corbett Report 2179
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1138
Webster Tarpley Website 1023

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public