Obama said to push Syrian no fly zone with prodding from the fox at the hen house,Turkey.

I have been looking for news on what President Obomba has planned for SyriaPerhaps this article will shine a light on the evil intentions of the NATO warmonger/world destroyersObama said to push Syria no-fly zone with prodding from TurkeyBecause you know Turkey needs protecting from blowback? I mentioned this just this morning in the previous postJust two of too many psycho people killers/planet destroyersFrom "cancer" to "House of Blood". NATO media is meme generating for yet more war!

 The fox guarding the henhousesTurkey- Well armed Turkey aided the rise of ISIS and yet NATO promises to defendGist of it?- Why should NATO defend a well armed Turkey from ISIS when Turkey aided the rise of ISIS. Forbes is selling you “blowback” Just another meme to misdirect.Refresh-The logical fallacy of “blowback". Intoxication with the blowback mind virus

Hoping no one falls for this garbage?!- World Tribune linked above

 LONDON — The United States is said to have been discussing a no-fly zone over Syria in an effort to stop Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.Diplomatic sources said President Barack Obama has been promoting a plan for a Western-backed coalition to impose a no-fly zone over northern Syria.“The proposal stems from Turkey, which sees this as a means to protect its border with Syria,” a source said.On Sept. 7, the London-based Al Hayat reported that Kerry discussed the no-fly zone with his Turkish counterpart, Ahmet Davutoglu. The Saudi-owned Al Hayat, in a report from Washington, said Obama viewed this proposal as a means to protect the Turkish border with Syria, the main route for ISIL.The sources said the no-fly zone would be restricted to Syria’s northern border with Turkey. They said ISIL controls most of three northern Syrian provinces and captured major Syrian military bases. “This could become a full-fledged proposal over the next week or so,” the source said.Kerry has already raised the prospect of NATO military intervention in Syria as a means to stop ISIL in Iraq. For his part, Obama said he would present a plan to stop ISIL during a speech on Sept. 10.

Gotta admit it bothers me that he is waiting to present his plans in a speech on Sept 10- Why?So he can use 9/11 as a hammer to justify his warmaking and mass slaughter plan?

 The next phase is now to start going on some offense,” Obama said in a U.S. television interview on Sept. 6. “The strategy both for Iraq and for Syria is that we will hunt down ISIL members and assets wherever they are.”Diplomats said Iran, the leading ally of Damascus, would play a significant role in any no-fly zone over Syria. They said Washington has been coordinating the anti-ISIL campaign with Teheran, including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.“Iran has offered to help. I, for one, think that’s useful,” Senate Intelligence Committee chairwoman Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a leading Obama ally, said.The administration has acknowledged U.S. interest in working with Iran against ISIL. The State Department said Washington did not want the U.S. military to harm Iranian operations in Iraq.

Now, I am going to take you all back to a post from August 28. I laid out my suspicions regarding what a US attack on Syria is going to look like and of course how it was going to be justified

ISIS = Smoke & Mirrors. Giving cover now for strikes on Syria

Here is how I see events falling into place based on the information at hand--The US will launch airstrikes into Syria.-They are and have been laying the groundwork for sometime now.- Creation of the petro state Kurdistan- (Israeli approved)-Soften targets for an onslaught of Islamists, Kurds, Turks and whoever else they have holed up in Northern Iraq-It is possible, once they have the territory for Kurdistan cleared of Syrians, they will then offer Syria a defacto truce that will be nothing of the sort.The US can spin the bogus truce narrative along this line.  ISIS is under control in Syria- so no more airstrikes and the so called 'civil war', that never was a civil war, will rage on with the same NATO Islamist fighters. Only this time, there will be more of them and they will be striking a weakened Syria.

I still this this as the most plausible scenario- Airstrikes that will push ISIS further into Syria to carry on with their destabilization-It is important to note that the US is planning to send yet more money to train more killers of SyriansObama seeks 500 million additional dollars to arm and train 'moderates' in Syria That's on top of countless billions that has been spent already

 President Barack Obama asked Congress to approve $500 million to arm and train “moderate” Syrian rebels fighting Bashar al-Assad’s regimeThe money, for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1/14

This additional spending ties right into the US spinning their bullshit truce narrative while increasing the death and destruction on a weakened SyriaRotten bastards!