libel

New York Times “anonymous” op-ed is the mainstream media’s latest magic trick

On September 5th, the media world was “rocked” by an anonymously authored op-ed piece in The New York Times that, to hear about it through all the other networks, was like the end of the world for President Trump. According to the op-ed piece itself, it is written by a “senior official in the Trump White House” who has “vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.”
CLICK HERE to Support The Duran >>

White House Confirms Plans To Rewrite Libel Laws To Target Press

White House press secretary Sean Spicer speaks during the daily press briefing at the White House in Washington, Friday, Feb. 3, 2017. (AP/Evan Vucci)
White House press secretary Sean Spicer confirmed Monday that the Trump administration is actively—and in his words “substantively”—reviewing the nation’s libel laws as it explores ways it could more easily sidestep First Amendment protections and target press coverage or news stories it deems objectionable.

Trump Considering Constitutional Amendment To Curb Critical Media Coverage

President Donald Trump’s Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, center, attends a news conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington, April 20, 2017. (AP/Andrew Harnik)
According to U.S. President Donald Trump’s chief of staff, Reince Priebus, the administration is still reviewing the country’s libel laws in a bid to prosecute journalists.

Trump Swings Back at Author of Fake Dossier: ‘Failed Spy’ Might Face Libel Action

21st Century Wire says…
In a Tweet, Donald Trump hints at libel action in response to the ‘Trump dossier’ which was allegedly compiled by former MI6 officer, Christopher Steele.
Is the Donald going to take the next logical step in battling fake news in the mainstream media, pushed by his political opponents and take one of their intelligence thugs to court? Keep an eye on this developing story.

The Devil and the Dark Net

The Internet has outgrown the common law of defamation, and new regulations to protect the Internet, free speech and the freedom to speak anonymously have been abused by cyber-bullies and cyber-stalkers, who have used this new medium to dispense their bullying in a greater distribution among more people. In my latest novel, I thought it may be interesting to examine the possibility of an Internet bully or cyber mob hiring a hit man anonymously through the Internet.

How Weaver Ignored Corcoran’s Segue

Four of the incidents in J Burke’s background chronology in Weaver v National Post (the January 27, 2005, February 15, 2005, August 2006 and February 27, 2008 incidents) relate, either in whole or in part, to a dispute between Weaver and National Post on whether Weaver had dismissed our research as “rubbish” or “balderdash” or a like pejorative.