Heresy


After many requests, I am responding to the typical objection of the “problem of evil” if there is a Being who is All Loving and All Good, how can He permit evil? In this brief Q n A I will respond to the 3 main objections from our philosophic perspective as outlined in Job and other places in patristics. Our view of evil is that it is a privation, a negation and a move of the will away from the Good. It has no being in itself and ontological existence.

If you like this analysis, purchase a signed copy here!
By: Jay Dyer

If you like this analysis, purchase a signed copy here!
 
By: Jay Dyer


Erick Ybarra attempted a response on canon 6 of Nicea and was so confused in his attempt to explain it away, I offered to hop on and debate it and the paradigms of Roman Catholic epistemology and Orthodoxy. The canonical and conciliar traditions about Rome as the first see grew, over many centuries, to be viewed as a magical divine super power. It’s that simple. RCs mistake and misuse canonical privileges for Divine Law and Institution. That is basically the entire debate – Bartholomew is doing this now.


Michael Lofton asks Jay about essence and energies, created and uncreated grace, authority in Orthodoxy, Gregory Palamas, Maximus the Confessor, among many other related topics!
“1. Sanctifying Grace is a created supernatural gift really distinct from God. (Sent. fidei proxima.” -Ludwig Ott
Versus:

Luc is finally getting what he wanted so bad – a debate! We will be discussing ADS and the Roman Catholic dogmas over against the Orthodox views. Luc is a Uniate. The debate is tonight at 10Pm EST 

Here is a list of the first few statements from Ott on grace:

If you like this analysis, purchase a signed copy here!
By: Jay Dyer




Islamic UK apologist Paul Williams (former Christian) has reached out for an exchange on the question of the Trinity in Scripture and the status of Christ in the Law, Prophets, NT and Church Fathers. I said I was glad and open to having a civil exchange. Sunday at 4PM EST


“RC Apologist” has mentioned me by name as someone he wants to debate Sola Scriptura with. Since I am a former Calvinist, I always welcome the opportunity to refute the position and its distinctives. The debate is not formal, but open crossfire and has no set time limit.  That the Church doesn’t determine her entire canon, but only the NT, is literally the stupidest argument I’ve ever heard.. “Dear rabbinical high court, What is the proper list of books that we heretic Christians should accept? Thanks, Paul the Apostle”