The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has released the raw data of three important scientific studies it used to evaluate glyphosate, the "Mysterious Three”. But does the information released enable independent scrutiny of EFSA’s evaluation?
The 15 scientists assembled by the EPA to analyze glyphosate struggled to reach a consensus amid an ocean of conflicting and, in some cases, flawed data
Creeping bentgrass can cross-pollinate with related wild species and spread uncontrollably
A new analysis using cutting-edge molecular profiling methods shows the genetic engineering process caused large increases in two potentially toxic compounds in a Monsanto Roundup-tolerant maize. Report: Claire Robinson
It’s lonely knowing you’re right. You’re met relentlessly by the simple-minded and trite. They never seem to wonder what’s right or wrong. We just know.
Some members backed EPA's finding that glyphosate was unlikely to be carcinogenic and others said that the evidence was “suggestive” of carcinogenic potential
Increase in the cultivation of cover crops to avoid ploughing
Forty percent of the articles showed conflicts of interest; studies with conflict of interest showed a 50 percent higher frequency of outcomes favourable to the interests of the GM crop company
Farmers in northeast China's Heilongjiang province, China's top grain producer, will be prohibited from growing GM crops
While the EPA may have hoped for resounding support from the Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP) it assembled, concerns were raised by some of the experts about the quality of the EPA’s analysis
