Visit ArabTopics.com

US "Downs" Legitimacy After Claims of Downing Iranian Drone

July 20, 2019 (Tony Cartalucci - NEO) - The US boasted of downing an Iranian drone over the Strait of Hormuz, admittedly in international waters, just miles off Iran's coast, and thousands of miles from Washington.

It claims the drone was "threatening" a US amphibious assault ship, the USS Boxer.

The Washington Post in its article, "Trump says the U.S. Navy downed an Iranian drone in the Strait of Hormuz," would claim:

A U.S. naval ship downed an Iranian drone that flew too close and ignored multiple calls to turn away, President Trump said Thursday, as tensions between the United States and Iran appeared to be rising once again in the Persian Gulf region. 

Speaking at the White House, Trump said the drone came within 1,000 yards of the USS Boxer in the Strait of Hormuz before the crew “took defensive action” and “immediately destroyed” it.

An AP article titled, "US warship downs Iranian drone in Hormuz Strait," noted that (emphasis added):

The Pentagon said the incident happened at 10 am local time on Thursday in international waters while the Boxer was transiting the waterway to enter the Persian Gulf. The Boxer is one of several US naval ships in the area, including the USS Abraham Lincoln, an aircraft carrier that has been operating in the nearby North Arabian Sea for weeks.

The claims come nearly a month after Iran shot down a US drone - an RQ-4A Global Hawk - operating near Iranian shores, also in the Strait of Hormuz.

At the time, the US condemned Iran's move claiming it had downed the drone over international waters. Now - the US openly claims it has shot down an Iranian drone over international waters. The overt hypocrisy is intentional. The US has been attempting to goad Tehran into an armed conflict for years with US policy papers openly admitting as much.

A 2009 Brookings Institution paper titled, "Which Path to Persia? Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran," would openly admit (emphasis added):

...it would be far more preferable if the United States could cite an Iranian provocation as justification for the airstrikes before launching them. Clearly, the more outrageous, the more deadly, and the more unprovoked the Iranian action, the better off the United States would be. Of course, it would be very difficult for the United States to goad Iran into such a provocation without the rest of the world recognizing this game, which would then undermine it.  

Apparently, the US is no longer concerned about whether or not the world recognizes this game and is doing everything in its power to goad Iran into miscalculating and granting the US justification for a long-desired and much larger conflict with Tehran.

Did the Iranian Drone Really Threaten the USS Boxer? Was it Even an Iranian Drone? 

As with most deliberate provocations - the recent US claims of downing an Iranian drone came with minimum details and no evidence at all. Not even the type of drone was mentioned by the Washington Post or AP.

Claims that the drone came within 1,000 yards of the ship and was disabled through electronic jamming indicates it was most likely an off-the-shelf drone used for photography and in no way posed a threat to the USS Boxer.

Iranian media - for its part - claims the US most likely shot down their own drone, and denies Iran was operating any of its own drones in the area at the time. Iran's PressTV in an article titled, "US may have shot down own drone in Persian Gulf, Iran says of Trump’s claim," would claim:

Iran has rejected US President Donald Trump’s claim that a US warship had shot down an Iranian Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) in the Strait of Hormuz. 

“We have not lost any drone in the Strait of Hormuz nor anywhere else,” Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Seyyed Abbas Araqchi said in a tweet on Friday. 

“I am worried that USS Boxer has shot down their own UAS by mistake!”

What is certain is that even if it were an Iranian drone, it couldn't have posed more of a threat to the USS Boxer than America's military presence in the Middle East poses to its inhabitants - a region where the US has repeatedly bombed, invaded, currently occupies or is waging war by proxy against multiple nations including Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, and indeed - Iran itself.

Beyond the Middle East the US has left Libya desolate and is currently occupying the Central Asian nation of Afghanistan - a military campaign that has lasted now nearly 2 decades and is unfolding along Iran's eastern border while the US continues to maintain a military presence in Iraq on Iran's western border.

The US currently maintains crippling sanctions against Iran, admittedly sponsors terrorist groups operating within Iran, and has repeatedly threatened to overthrow the Iranian government through open military intervention, US-sponsored "color revolutions," as well as economic and covert military means.

The UK - equally committed to Washington's desire to overthrow the Iranian government - has even recently hijacked an Iranian tanker in the Strait of Gibraltar.

Under ordinary circumstances, a military drone approaching a ship of any kind from any nation in international waters - allegedly as close as 1,000 yards - would be considered a provocation. But Iranian drones - if this was indeed the case - approaching a US warship plying the waters of a region utterly ravaged by US military aggression can at best be considered scrutiny the US has earned itself through its own destructive foreign policy - a foreign policy that fully intends to visit the same destruction brought upon nations like Yemen, Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Afghanistan - upon Iran as well.

Iran surely has the right to defend itself - to track US warships as they pass just miles from its own shores - whether in "international waters" or not. And if Iran is not allowed to fire on US drones over these same "international waters," what gave the US the right to do so?

There is a much easier solution for the US if its goal really is to ensure the safety of its vessels travelling the globe - stop provoking conflict, thus eliminating the chances of its vessels becoming targets during such conflict.

Of course, the US will not do this. It will continue pursuing hegemonic foreign policy until it is economically and militarily no longer able to do so. For Iran - the trick will be avoiding provocations designed to trigger a war the US still believes it can win until global dynamics change enough to ensure whatever war the US triggers it will have no chance of winning.

Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially for the online magazine New Eastern Outlook”.

Source: 
Land Destroyer

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
WWI Hidden History 50
Grayzone Project 163
Pass Blue 207
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 14
John Pilger 416
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 2572
FEE 4587
Marine Le Pen 380
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 905
Mohamed Omar 371
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 40
Angry Foreigner 18
Fritte Fritzson 12
Teologiska rummet 32
Filosofiska rummet 106
Vetenskapsradion Historia 152
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 217
Les Crises 2791
Richard Falk 166
Ian Sinclair 107
SpinWatch 61
Counter Currents 9446
Kafila 471
Gail Malone 39
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 95
The Duran 9721
Vanessa Beeley 122
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 5627
Paul Craig Roberts 1808
News Junkie Post 58
Nomi Prins 27
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 4757
Sir Ken Robinson 24
Stephan Kinsella 97
Liberty Blitzkrieg 851
Sami Bedouin 64
Consortium News 2669
21 Century Wire 3537
Burning Blogger 324
Stephen Gowans 88
David D. Friedman 152
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1514
Tom Dispatch 523
Levant Report 18
The Saker 4301
The Barnes Review 526
John Friend 472
Psyche Truth 159
Jonathan Cook 145
New Eastern Outlook 3969
School Sucks Project 1775
Giza Death Star 1914
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 612
GMWatch 2295
Robert Faurisson 150
Espionage History Archive 34
Jay's Analysis 962
Le 4ème singe 90
Jacob Cohen 207
Agora Vox 15477
Cercle Des Volontaires 436
Panamza 2186
Fairewinds 117
Project Censored 945
Spy Culture 527
Conspiracy Archive 76
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 567
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 835
Independent Science News 80
The Anti Media 6664
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 292
The Mind renewed 441
Natural Society 2619
Yanis Varoufakis 999
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 114
Web of Debt 145
Porkins Policy Review 423
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 596
Libyan War Truth 335
DeadLine Live 1913
Kevin Ryan 63
BSNEWS 2080
Aaron Franz 233
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 121
Dr. Bruce Levine 145
Peter B Collins 1561
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 10763
Climate Audit 224
Donna Laframboise 438
Judith Curry 1131
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2382
Syria Report 78
Human Rights Investigation 91
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 11899
Laura Wells Solutions 44
Video Rebel's Blog 436
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 20449
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 3010
Northerntruthseeker 2382
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4712
AntiWar.com Blog 3070
AntiWar.com Original Content 6944
Corbett Report 2359
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1198
Webster Tarpley Website 1103

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public