Las Vegas Mass Shooting FALSE FLAG Operation: They Keep Changing Their Story On Vegas Shooting!

THIS IS FACT:  The Las Vegas Shooting false flag operation is falling to pieces for the real perpetrators involved... Every so called press conference and/or news conference conducted by the LIARS in the Las Vegas Police Force and/or the FBI now has so many holes and inconsistencies that you could basically drive a freaking Mac Truck THROUGH those holes!  It is so disgusting that anyone with even two brain cells rubbing together can still believe anything that the liars in the US government and the Jew spew media are trying to convey to the gullible sheep.... And yet, sadly, the majority of American dumb ass mutton heads still believe their garbage? Well, I have more updates on the Las Vegas operation that I want to present here... Some key information has come forward over the last few days concerning the supposed "movements" and supposed "shooting" that took place on the 32nd floor of Mandalay Bay by our patsy, Stephen Paddock, that is so laughable that I could not help but think "How stupid do they really think we are?"....The first update that I want to present here comes courtesy of Jody Paulson, who of course writes the blog "What They Don't Tell You" at www.jpaulson.blogspot.com.... This one is entitled: "They Keep Changing Their Story On Vegas Shooting" and is a must read by everyone... Pay attention also to the important video enclosed from Youtube user "American Everyman" aka Scott Creighton, that blows holes in the laughable "Press Conference" just conducted the other night by the liars in the Las Vegas police force... Here is that article:

TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2017


They keep changing their story on Vegas shooting

... and now it's stretched beyond belief!It's been over a week since I last posted, though obvious terror attack lies are my "specialty" if I could be said to have any on this blog. Things were just too confusing for me, because, perhaps more than usual, the official narrative keeps changing. It's gotten to the point of total absurdity.As you can see from my last post, the number of guns found in Mr. Paddock's room have swelled from the initial report of 10 to 23, with varying numbers in between. What, these cops don't know how to count? And, in the beginning, Mr. Paddock checked in using his girlfriend's ID, which is how her name showed up so quickly in the news.Now we are told that Paddock actually fired over 200 rounds down the hall of his hotel room (injuring a security guard), in a major Las Vegas casino which I can only imagine is crawling with security, and then goes on to fire hundreds of rounds into the crowd below for several minutes before 911 was called. How is this even remotely believable?We were told security had to go floor to floor to find out where the shooter was shooting from, when he had already fired a couple hundred rounds down the hall of his hotel room, injuring a security guard. In a building housing millions of dollars and security on par with a major metropolitan bank. Really???Scott Creighton of American Everyman made a video outlining the "official timeline" and how much it has changed since the sheriff's press conference last night.POSTED BY JODY PAULSON AT 8:27 AM OK, Now I want to present a further update by Scott Creighton that I just watched today that further tears holes in that ridiculous "press conference" and blows holes in this "security guard shooting" that is so ridiculous in its own context:Now, I have also been so puzzled by something that I first became aware of a couple of days ago that I found so asinine that I did not even bother to put it up here... BUT apparently the liars in the Jew spew media are going with this impossible tale!   This one concerns the impossible idea promoted by these liars that Stephen Paddock somehow 'got control of hotel security systems' and actually was TELEVISING HIS SHOOTING for the world to see (Yes, they are actually claiming this to be real!)  First here is the link to an article from the True Pundit website that claims that this shooter is suddenly not only the world's greatest marksman, but a tech geek with full knowledge of Internet/Video internet operations as well... Here is that link:https://truepundit.com/fbi-probing-las-vegas-shooters-video-of-massacre-reportedly-sent-live-feed-offshore/OK, Being a Telecommunications expert myself, I can safely claim that what True Pundit claims is NOT factual and if it did happen, then this was not done by this Stephen Paddock... To hijack that hotel's entire Internet/TV/Security systems and bandwidth would require a team of technical experts leading to once again this being a preplanned operation... That is, if this "Stephen Paddock watching his own videos via security cameras' was actually real, which it is NOT!....Jim Stone over at www.jimstone.is, has also caught on to this "video streaming" impossibility and is absolutely attacking the pure ignorance of the American sheep for falling for this garbage.. .Here is Jim's article here:THANK GOD FOR COMMON CORE AND HORRIBLE COLLEGES DOING PROGRAMMING RATHER THAN EDUCATING.

As a direct result of the destruction of America's schools, absolute morons are entering the intelligence agencies and screwing up big time.  This won't do anything to stop them from killing people like they did in Vegas, but it does a WHOLE LOT to make the truth come out about what they did, because the screw ups are so massive the entire contrived aspect collapses in on itself.

Ok so he jammed all the security video but watched it himself. That's a fault of the colleges, which are supposed to teach people to think, and more importantly, convince people that other people really might be able to think. Obviously not much thinking happened in the Vegas psy op, which used the most ridiculous conflicting crap anyone could imagine, and anyone who could think would reject outright. The plot had our patsy using "massive internet bandwidth" also. But thinking people will see right through that, because there is very little reason to use a lot of bandwidth for ANYTHING OTHER THAN VIDEO. Why would he want video to get streamed to his room in abundance for any reason other than entertainment, rather than monitoring hotel security via some stupid hack WHEN THE OTHER PART OF THE STORY SAYS HE JAMMED ALL THE SECURITY VIDEO. If he jammed it, he sure as * would not be able to use "massive internet bandwidth" to watch it.

Common core only needed to explain why the intelligence agencies can't provide a shred of legit video. ANSWER: HE JAMMED IT. FORGET THE DETAILS, HE JAMMED IT! YEAH, THAT'S WHY THERE IS NO VIDEO TO PROVE OUR STORY!

Maybe his "massive internet bandwidth" was from constantly streaming netflix in HD. That would do it. Common core educated people won't think of that explanation, which is too mundane to care about, because common core leads to toddler type thinking, where only what is right there in your hand needs to matter. Nothing at all common core comes up with will add up in a way that would fool even a semi functional old school adult so jamming the security video and then using massive wifi bandwidth to watch it works just fine in la la land.Since common core math is done in such a confusing way, no one who set this up could add well enough to figure out how many bullet casings should be left on the floor of the room for the photo op. Or how many magazines. So a few magazines and a pocket full of spent casings ought to work just fine in common core land. They just figured saying "he had 20 guns" would cut it, when 20 guns equals 20 magazines for 600 rounds, a number far too low to accomplish what was done (and they did not even have the aftermath of that much on the floor, not even close!.)  Common core simply said "everyone will think 20 guns is a lot, so that will make the story hold up".In the latest common core flop, supposedly while jamming the video he had video so clear he used it to shoot a security guard right through the door, a guard who was on his way to another room and was just casually walking by, showing no interest in Paddocks door whatsoever. A double whammy, where they recently doubled down on stupid.  Shooting a guard who could care less about your room may work in common core la la land, but anyone with a brain is going to ask a serious question - if the guard was only walking by, which is expected, why shoot him for that, right through a closed door? Common core just says "believe what you are told". That's the only way the latest ornament on the fable that is the official story could possibly not fall right off the tree.

The stupid is so deep that even minor details in the story line have unlimited worm holes in the logic, that lead to such a leaky story it can never be patched.Here's a good example of one of those worm holes:

FACT: COLD HARD FACT COMMON CORE TYPES WON'T EVER KNOW, AND MUCH LESS, PUT IN A STORY LINE: Casinos have thousands of cameras everywhere to catch cheaters and trouble makers. The only thing that can handle SO MANY CAMERAS is fiber optic, which can't be jammed, absent the microwave magnetron I suggested, which would blow the circuits in a camera rather than jam it (and only kill one camera). Common core types will never in a million years understand why you can't put 1000 plus cameras on a single wifi channel, and then have the whole hotel surf that wifi to boot! All common core types know is when they plug their stuff in, it works.

If you are going to believe the official story of Vegas, (if for any reason you want to,) to help swallow it I suggest first finding a way to block your breathing with a pillow until you pass out, then ovedose on 5 different drugs, plus alcohol, and then disable the air bags and try to get more brain damage in a car wreck. A few vaccines ought to help with that too. Maybe you could find a few of the old mercury batteries and swallow them after cracking open a few mercury thermometers and making a cocktail with that also.Or you could just attend a modern American school, get programmed to be stupid, and skip the actual brain damage.There is a silver lining in the reality of America's horrible schools. And it was the story that came out of Vegas. For those who do not have damaged brains, or brains that were disabled via a sabotaged education system, the out right crappy quality of the story line actually resulted in full government disclosure and transparency in what really went on, even though they tried to avoid it at all cost.

Alex Jones finally mentioned multiple shooters in Vegas

Maybe it was not the first time. I don't follow him closely, and there's a reason: Here's the deal: You can't be called a truther if you mix 70 percent MSM bullshit with 30 percent of what people have discovered is true. Either you take one side or the other. There can't be a lone shooter and multiple shooters in the same story. If you can't decide what is what, in my book you are OUT.NTS Notes:  Sadly, I have to agree with Jim... The American people are once again too stupid for their own good and have fallen for this garbage with absolutely no thought or rationality....The trouble to me is that most Americans are simply too far gone now to be of any hope for their own nation.. Most are just brain dead zombies that believe anything their idiot boxes aka "Talmudvision" ram into their drug/fluoride destroyed brains without any real critical thinking skills.... Therefore the real criminals behind this operation know that they have gotten away with this crime and are all having a good laugh at how stupid the American people truly are!Well, there we have it... Now this Stephen Paddock is not only a superman in his abilities to shoot from that 32nd floor set of windows even without any real gun training, and shooting 200 shots into the 32nd floor lobby and luckily "hitting" a security officer that just so happens to be walking by his room at just the right time before he supposedly turns his weapons on to the streets below, but is also this super tech geek as well that can hijack the hotel's internet and video services?   One word comes to mind "WOW"!   and I do wonder what kind of bullshit whopper the liars in the Las Vegas Police force and the FBI will come up with next?This story continues.. And every day now the real perpetrators are having to change their stories on the fly to cover for their lies... The problem is the more they lie, the more questions they invoke....Eventually the lies will catch up on them and when that happens I do hope that there is someone left in brain dead America to charge them for this crime....More to comeNTS*One update:  Jim Stone added this snippet from his website at www.jimstone.is to this strange tale of the 'security guard' that they claim was "shot by Stephen Paddock"... Apparently according to the person in the room next to this 'shooter's den', it was the POLICE that shot the security guard... Here is that extra bit from Jim Stone that shows how this story gets stranger and stranger by the minute:Dead security guardA man who was staying in room 31234, next door to Paddocks, said police shot the security guard. Why would Mister Hodge say that, only to have the story change to the patsy shooting the guard?  EASY ANSWER: Because the security guard went up with the police, and saw that none of the windows were missing from the room. For that, he had to die.You know what I really think? I think there was never even a death scene set up at the Mandalay, and it was probably staged in a mock room elsewhere. For the daytime photos (to satisfy the press) they had to kick a couple windows out for show but they are probably already fixed by now, if they are not it is for show.

ADDITIONAL OFFICIAL STORY DOOM: 

I never saw proof of what Paddock's room layout looked like, and did not want to say anything because on the top floors the vista suite does wrap around to include both broken windows. But as it turns out, the floor plan finally got published, and on Paddock's floor, the vist suite ends before the second broken window, just as people have been saying the whole time. Until I found proof, I did not want to say it myself. This means that to do the shooting, Paddock had to kick a wall out and join the two rooms. WHY IN THE * would anyond do that, when it would provide no strategic advantage at all? The answer to that question is below, in the next report.