I have been sent countless emails and a lot of comments over the last few days about that horrendous and unjustifiable attack by that CRIMINAL US President, Donald Drumpf, against the nation of Syria... Even with every single piece of information staring this war criminal right in his face that the so called "chemical weapons" attack in Idlib province earlier in the week was nothing more than pure unadulterated bullshit and an obvious false flag, Donald Drumpf obeyed his Jewish masters and his Jewish advisors and went ahead with that attack on the Shayrat air base in Homs province without any provocation or cause... It was an open declaration of war by the US against Syria itself, and could lead the US into yet another ridiculous war in the Middle East where the only winner will be the psychotic nation of Israel itself!In my last article, I openly questioned the real facts about that air strike by the US using their "Tomahawk" cruise missiles.... Apparently the reality came out very quickly that ONLY some 23 out of 59 missiles actually hit that base, and I asked the hard question then about what the hell happened to the other 36? Where did those missiles strike? I said clearly that not all of those 36 missiles could have been duds or missed their targets and that some had to have been aimed purposely at other targets.... And we found out only later that YES some of those "errant" missiles actually did hit some civilian targets since reports surfaced that some "4-5 children" were murdered from these cruise missile strikes! But obviously I am still assessing the outcome of this strike, and again to show that it was NOT this great "success" as the liars in the Jew spew media continue to promote, I want to present a most interesting article here that comes from "The Saker" online website, at www.thesaker.is, that gives some incredible information about the reality of this missile strike and especially the idea that the Russians used electronic warfare defense systems in Syria to purposely "divert" those 36 cruise missiles away from Shayrat airbase, and why they possibly "allowed" the other 23 to strike... Here is that article right here, and my own thoughts and comments to follow:SITREP: Important update on the US attack on SyriaI have an important update: based on Russian sources, including video footage and the reports of one Russian journalist on the ground, Evgenii Poddubnyi, it has become clear that the US strike was largely symbolic. Here is the evidence:
- The Russians were given a warning which they, of course, passed on to the Syrians. The Americans must have assumed that this would happen.
- The Syrian airbase was lightly damaged: a few number of aircraft were damaged or destroyed, but many of these were in repairs and could not fly. Fuel storage tanks were destroyed. A number of aircraft bunkers were damage or destroyed. A few barracks were also destroyed.
- There were 6 or 7 casualties, which is very little.
- Crucially, the runways did not suffer.
Now here is the really intriguing thing: it appears that only 23 out of a total of 59 US cruise missiles hit the base. The rest are unaccounted for. This could be due to all sorts of reasons, including Syrian and Russian air defenses or Russian electronic warfare. I tend to believe that the latter is the cause. But then, this begs another question: why did the Russians let 23 of the cruise missiles through? Possibly to appease Trump and not force him to re-strike. Other possibility, to make sure that the political fallout from this stupid and reckless attack still come back to hurt the United States (had they destroyed all the cruise missiles this would not happen).As for the Russian political reaction, I find it rather flaccid: Russia has condemned the attack and suspended the Memorandum of Understanding on Prevention of Flight Safety Incidents in the course of operations in Syria signed with the US.Meh, I am rather unimpressed.Here is the full Russian MoFA statement:
The United States conducted strikes against Syrian government troops in the early hours of April 7, using chemical weapons attacks in Idlib Province as a pretext.The US opted for a show of force, for military action against a country fighting international terrorism without taking the trouble to get the facts straight.It is not the first time that the US chooses an irresponsible approach that aggravates problems the world is facing, and threatens international security. The very presence of military personnel from the US and other countries in Syria without consent from the Syrian government or a UN Security Council mandate is an egregious and obvious violation of international law that cannot be justified. While previous initiatives of this kind were presented as efforts to combat terrorism, now they are clearly an act of aggression against a sovereign Syria. Actions undertaken by the US today inflict further damage to the Russia-US relations.Russia has expressed on numerous occasions that it was ready to cooperate on resolving the most urgent issues the world is facing today, and that fighting international terrorism was a top priority. However, we will never agree to unsanctioned action against the legitimate Syrian government that has been waging an uncompromising war on international terrorism for a long time.Seeking to justify military action Washington has totally distorted what had happened in Idlib. The US could not have failed to grasp the fact that the Syrian government troops did not use chemical weapons there. Damascus simply does not have them, as confirmed a number of times by qualified experts. This was the conclusion reached by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). Over the recent years this organisation inspected almost all the facilities linked or possibly linked to Syria’s chemical weapons programme. As for Idlib, the terrorists operating there used to produce toxic land mines intended for use in Syria and Iraq. These manufacturing facilities were put out of operation in a military operation carried out by the Syrian air force.The US pretends that it does not understand obvious things, turning a blind eye to the use of chemical weapons in Iraq, officially confirmed by Baghdad. The US refuses to believe the evidence provided by certified documents confirming the use of chemical weapons by terrorists in Aleppo. In doing so, the US is abetting international terrorism and making it stronger. New WMD attacks can be expected.There is no doubt that the military action by the US is an attempt to divert attention from the situation in Mosul, where the campaign carried out among others by US-led coalition has resulted in hundreds of civilian casualties and an escalating humanitarian disaster.It is obvious that the cruise missile attack was prepared in advance. Any expert understands that Washington’s decision on air strikes predates the Idlib events, which simply served as a pretext for a show of force.Russia suspends the Memorandum of Understanding on Prevention of Flight Safety Incidents in the course of operations in Syria signed with the US.We call on the UN Security Council to hold an emergency meeting to discuss the latest developments.
Again, I am very underwhelmed to put it mildly.I hope that the outrage inside Russia will force Lavrov to cancel his planned meeting with Tillerson. The usually sleepy Duma seems to be uncharacteristically outraged.On a personal note, I will be gone all day and most of the week-end I will be attending Church services for the feasts of the Annunciation and the Entry of our Lord into Jerusalem.You can expect an analysis by Monday or Tuesday at the latest.The SakerPS: needless to say, no chemical weapons or chemical weapon storage facilities were damaged: we know that since NOBODY, including the Russian reporters, were even carrying, nevermind wearing, any gas masks or, even less so, full chemical protection suits. This is hardly surprising since, of course, they never existed in the first place.PPS: just for the record, this attack was a direct and clear violation of
- US national law (Trump never got Congress to authorize this attack)
- International law (Trump is now a criminal guilty of the crime of ‘aggression’)
- The UN Charter
In other words, Trump is now a war criminal and the USA a rogue state (again).NTS Notes: I have wondered for the last two days myself about the very nature of this "strike" against the Shayrat airbase, and especially how the US "alerted" the Russians hours before the attack took place... Did the Drumpf administration not factor in the reality that the Russians would of course alert their Syrian allies that this "attack" was coming? Something right there stinks to high heaven...And of course I have seen article after article now come forward showing how that Shayrat air base was nothing of the sort.. .Supposedly that complex was actually used as a "dumping ground" for faulty and ill equipped Russian and Syrian fighter planes, and contained NONE of the more modern aircraft being used by both the Syrian and the Russian air forces... So this begs the question about US "intelligence" and how they missed the fact that this base was basically a dud and should not even have been considered a target at all!I also was wondering myself about the electronic warfare facilities that the Russians have incorporated into the Syrian air defense systems... How could those systems not have reacted to this cruise missile attack and not launched countermeasures? AND the million dollar question then is... If the countermeasures were switched on, then WHY did the Russians allow these 23 missiles through while disabling the other 36? Are we all being treated as suckers here? And is this nothing more than a propaganda stunt being organized by both the Russians AND the American government?Overall though, we should not be fooled by the actions of criminal President Donald Drumpf by this attack.. In one fatal move, this man has exposed himself as a barbaric war criminal that does not act under international law (Sound familiar? Shades of GW Bush and Barry Soetoro, right?)... And in one stupid idiotic move by this war criminal, he has finally showed his "followers" that he can NOT be trusted and does NOT have the best interests of the American public at heart.... And to those few commentators that claim that I was a "supporter" of Drumpf, I must again reiterate that I had questions about him from the beginning and WARNED clearly that we all must be weary of him. I stated that with the failings of the US "selection" system with only 2 viable candidates for last November's "vote" there was no real choice, considering how truly psychotic Killary Clinton is, other than to try to select the so called "lesser" of two evils.. But EVIL IS STILL EVIL, and NOW we see how truly broken and corrupt the entire electoral process in America is and how the American people need to wake up and see the reality that they have another criminal murderous Jew butt kisser in the White House.... YES, I was hoping that I was wrong, and sadly we see the reality today that this bullshit "Making America Great Again" is exactly that.. PURE 100% BOVINE EXCREMENT... Donald Drumpf the war criminal... Wake up and smell the roses, America!More to comeNTS