I rarely turn on the Jew spew media "news" these days, for I am truly disgusted by watching this bullshit 'COVID-19 Pandemic!!' nonsense now running a full 24/7 and filling gullible peoples' minds with idiotic and stupid fear porn..... It should be apparent to everyone with even 2 brain cells to rub together that the fuel for the fire of this bullshit "pandemic" is definitely the "programming" from the media sources and those bastards and liars are indeed fully on board with having everyone so stricken by fear that the morons out there will definitely accept their enslavement as the "solution" to this fraud "pandemic"...But one thing that did catch my ears and my eyes when I switched on the local "news" reports up here in central Canada, and that was the "push" for even more 'testing' for this "disease" that IMHO does not even exist.... The reports kept claiming that "better" and "more accurate" tests were becoming available, and I thought to myself; Is the message therefore that all of the "tests" so far conducted then are inaccurate?......Which of course leads me again to the suspicion that ALL of the so called 'tests' are nothing but a sham and are indeed giving in almost ALL cases "false positive" results!OK, I have put up some previous articles from Jon Rappoport, through his website at "www.nomorefakenews.com" and recently his articles have indeed tackled the issue of the so called "tests" and how they are nothing but a sham..... And Jon earlier today released a brand new article at his website that is entitled: "Corona: creating the illusion of a pandemic through diagnostic tests" that once again absolutely blows holes in the so called 'testing' being conducted for this COVID-19 nonsense.... Here in fact is that article right here in its entirety for all of my own readers to view for themselves, and I absolutely do of course have my own thoughts and comments to follow:Corona: creating the illusion of a pandemic through diagnostic testsby Jon RappoportApril 8, 2020(To join our email list, click here.)Nailed them, with their own words.In this article, I’ll present quotes from official sources about their own diagnostic test for the coronavirus. I’m talking about fatal flaws in the test.Because case numbers are based on those tests (or no tests at all), the whole “pandemic effect” has been created out of fake science.In a moment of truth, a propaganda pro might murmur to a colleague, “You know, we’ve got a great diagnostic test for the virus. The test turns out all sorts of results that say this person is diseased and that person is diseased. Millions of diseased people. But the test doesn’t really measure that. The test is ridiculous, but ridiculous in our favor. It builds the picture of a global pandemic. An excuse to lock down the planet and wreck economies and lives…”The widespread test for the COVID-19 virus is called the PCR. I have written much about it in past articles.Now let’s go to published official literature, and see what it reveals. Spoiler alert: the admitted holes and shortcomings of the test are devastating.From “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel” [1]:“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”Translation: A positive test doesn’t guarantee that the COVID virus is causing infection at all. And, ahem, reading between the lines, maybe the COVID virus might not be in the patient’s body at all, either.From the World Health Organization (WHO): “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) technical guidance: Laboratory testing for 2019-nCoV in humans” [2]:“Several assays that detect the 2019-nCoV have been and are currently under development, both in-house and commercially. Some assays may detect only the novel virus [COVID] and some may also detect other strains (e.g. SARS-CoV) that are genetically similar.”Translation: Some PCR tests register positive for types of coronavirus that have nothing to do with COVID—including plain old coronas that cause nothing more than a cold.The WHO document adds this little piece: “Protocol use limitations: Optional clinical specimens for testing has [have] not yet been validated.”Translation: We’re not sure which tissue samples to take from the patient, in order for the test to have any validity. From the FDA: “LabCorp COVID-19RT-PCR test EUA Summary: ACCELERATED EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) SUMMARYCOVID-19 RT-PCR TEST (LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA)” [3]:“…The SARS-CoV-2RNA [COVID virus] is generally detectable in respiratory specimens during the acute phase of infection. Positive results are indicative of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA; clinical correlation with patient history and other diagnostic information is necessary to determine patient infection status…THE AGENT DETECTED MAY NOT BE THE DEFINITE CAUSE OF DISEASE (CAPS are mine). Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities.”Translation: On the one hand, we claim the test can “generally” detect the presence of the COVID virus in a patient. But we admit that “the agent detected” on the test, by which we mean COVID, “may not be the definite cause of disease.” We also admit that, unless the patient has an acute infection, we can’t find COVID. Therefore, the idea of “asymptomatic patients” confirmed by the test is nonsense. And even though a positive test for COVID may not indicate the actual cause of disease, all positive tests must be reported—and they will be counted as “COVID cases.” Regardless.From a manufacturer of PCR test kit elements, Creative Diagnostics, “SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Multiplex RT-qPCR Kit” [4]:“Regulatory status: For research use only, not for use in diagnostic procedures.”Translation: Don’t use the test result alone to diagnose infection or disease. Oops.“non-specific interference of Influenza A Virus (H1N1), Influenza B Virus (Yamagata), Respiratory Syncytial Virus (type B), Respiratory Adenovirus (type 3, type 7), Parainfluenza Virus (type 2), Mycoplasma Pneumoniae, Chlamydia Pneumoniae, etc.”Translation: Although this company states the test can detect COVID, it also states the test can read FALSELY positive if the patient has one of a number of other irrelevant viruses in his body. What is the test proving, then? Who knows? Flip a coin.“Application Qualitative”Translation: This clearly means the test is not suited to detect how much virus is in the patient’s body. I’ll cover how important this admission is in a minute.“The detection result of this product is only for clinical reference, and it should not be used as the only evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment. The clinical management of patients should be considered in combination with their symptoms/signs, history, other laboratory tests and treatment responses. The detection results should not be directly used as the evidence for clinical diagnosis, and are only for the reference of clinicians.”Translation: Don’t use the test as the exclusive basis for diagnosing a person with COVID. And yet, this is exactly what health authorities are doing all over the world. All positive tests must be reported to government agencies, and they are counted as COVID cases.”Those quotes, from official government and testing sources, torpedo the whole “scientific” basis of the test.And now, I’ll add another, lethal blow: the test has never been validated properly as an instrument to detect disease. Even assuming it can detect the presence of the COVID virus in a patient, it doesn’t show HOW MUCH virus is in the body. And that is key, because in order to even begin talking about actual illness in the real world, not in a lab, the patient would need to have millions and millions of the virus actively replicating in his body.Proponents of the test assert that it CAN measure how much virus is in the body. To which I reply: prove it.Prove it in a way it should have been proven decades ago—but never was.Take five hundred people and remove tissue samples from them. The people who take the samples do NOT do the test. The testers will never know who the patients are and what condition they’re in.The testers run their PCR on the tissue samples. In each case, they say which virus they found and HOW MUCH of it they found.“All right, in patients 24, 46, 65, 76, 87, and 93 we found a great deal of virus.”Now we un-blind those patients. They should all be sick, because they have so much virus replicating in their bodies. Are they sick? Are they running marathons? Let’s find out.This OBVIOUS vetting of the test has never been done. That is an enormous scandal. Where are the controlled test results in 500 patients, a thousand patients? Nowhere.The test is an unproven fraud.And, therefore, the COVID pandemic, which is supposed to be based on that test, is also a fraud.“But…but…what about all the sick and dying people…why are they sick?”I’ve written thousands of words answering that question, in past articles. A NUMBER of conditions—none involving COVID, and most involving old traditional diseases—are making people sick.Sources:[1]: (link)[2]: (link)[3]: (link)[4]: (link)NTS Notes: I will say it... Jon nailed it and has exposed the entire "testing procedures" that we have right now for this fraud disease as being nothing more than frauds themselves!As a man of science myself, I have had to wonder what the criminals in charge were using as their "reference points" in terms of this entire COVID-19 "testing"? There had to be some type of fundamental point that they could use to "compare" the test results from supposed patients to a set standard or "control group guideline" to determine if they actually did have this 'disease', right? As shown, the criminals are claiming that they are trying to detect the presence of SARS-Cov2-RNA AND are trying to use that 'detection' along with "other clinical correlations in the "PATIENTS HISTORY" (!) to use as their determination as to whether the patient is contagious or not! ...And what Jon has pointed out is that they clearly have no such point of reference or comparison to a "controlled" set of experimental guidelines for such "tests" to actually claim if the "infection" is present or if the patient is actually virulent and contagious..... Therefore the entire "testing" procedure is again nothing more than ambiguous at best, and can be seen as a massive fraud!I therefore will state that anyone who is actually 'tested' for this supposed "virus" runs the risk of getting a "false positive" result, and the resulting anguish of the fraud "14 days of isolation" as well as the ANXIETY that may actually drive the victim into really getting sick!Once again, we are stuck with a bunch of bullshit in regards to these 'tests'.... As Jon states; The test is an unproven fraud.... And as I said before, even I that does suffer from nearly seasonal Bronchitis attacks could when I have a runny nose and sniffles, go and get this "test' and have the persons conducting that fraud come back and claim that I have "COVID-19"! More to comeNTS
Source