Information packed post below:Take the time to listen to both presentations included directly below the must read info; First hattip over to NTS:
How fortuitous that Greed-a Trademarked her brand in advance of her Nobel nomination.
Greeda-a ®™ will most likely win the Nobel prize upping the value of her brand. Of, course I could be mistaken, but do find the timing of her trademarking and the announcement of her nomination far to convenient to have just been happenstance.A relavent aside- Friday for Future = 666
hattip anonymous commenterMishkoFebruary 5, 2020 at 10:32 AMNot to go all 'laminati, but that does signal 666.DeletePennyFebruary 5, 2020 at 5:07 PM
Hi Mishko:
thanks for pointing that out- it does signify 666, undeniable and really not a shocker considering the satanic agenda
What else to expect from the death cult? The Nobel prize is just more of that perception management type stuff . You believe it's prestigious in the completely wrong meaning of the word
- Most of us wrongly assume that prestige or prestigious is about:
“the respect and admiration that someone or something gets for being successful or important” or “commanding position in people's minds”
If you thought that was all there was to that word, you would be mistaken Prestige
originates : Mid 17th century (in the sense 'illusion, conjuring trick'): from French, literally 'illusion, glamour', from late Latin praestigium 'illusion', from Latin praestigiae (plural) 'conjuring tricks'. The transference of meaning occurred by way of the sense 'dazzling influence, glamour', at first depreciatory.
Greeda's nobel nomination®™ should be considered a trick. To make fools of us all. She's a phony green as sure as Prince Charles is just another one of those detestable phony greensHe is "prestigious" as well. Him and the royal nut jobs make fools of many.
"The royal flew 125 miles from Highgrove to Cambridge to speak to scientists from Cambridge University’s Whittle Laboratory, who are leading research into the decarbonisation of air travel.
It is estimated that his total journey of 368 miles cost at least £12,000 and caused about 2.5 tonnes of carbon emissions"
But ya know he doesn't make his travel arrangements and he buys offsets... (eyes rolling)
And so the sophistry continues... You do realize that’s what we’re dealing with right?
Sophistry is reasoning that seems plausible on a superficial level but is actually unsound, or reasoning that is used to deceive.
James Corbett’s latest touches on just some of the sophistry involved in the AGW hoax
Finally. Did you know we're not God's faves? I didn't know that either? And do wonder how anyone could know and make that claim and be taken seriously? After listening twice to this interview, the only conclusion I can come away with is this, ahem, man of the cloth is pushing humanity to accept it's demise. Not because it's inevitable, but, because it's desired by the elite asses.The "Rev" comes off as insane and irrational. Just my observational opinion. Please do listen and share your thoughts:Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Michael Dowd: [00:26:48] the data Alex Alex we have a limited amount of time You’re wasting time by talking about something I don’t give a shit about I don’t care about the climate sciences hoax I don’t care about where some scientists were I don’t care about that I’m looking at Paul Beckwith and Nicholas Humphrey Meteorologists Nick Humphrey and Paul Beckwith Those are the kinds of people I go to and Peter Wadhams In terms of the Arctic I pay attention to a select understanding of the data that’s in controvertible that nobody is arguing but nobody anywhere is arguing with and it’s about abrupt climate change Get that word abrupt Climate change I can go into the details if you want me to but I’m not interested in debating and trying to defend the liberal consensus It ain’t going to happen so you’re wasting my time
Abrupt Climate Change.... Hey that's Corbett's rebranding in action. What do you know? Is it any wonder I find this agenda and the individuals that promote it totally and completely reprehensible. Offensive. And worse, still, death pushers.