Visit ArabTopics.com

Four fronts for climate policy

by Judith Curry

“For decades, scientists and policymakers have framed the climate-policy debate in a simple way: scientists analyse long-term goals, and policymakers pretend to honour them. Those days are over. Serious climate policy must focus more on the near-term and on feasibility.” – Y. Xu, V. Ramanathan, D. Victor

On twitter, Joe Duarte drew my attention to an editorial published in Nature: Global warming will happen faster than we think.

No surprise that the article sounds the ‘alarm’, accelerated warming, speeding freight train, and all that.

Towards the end of the article, the authors make some very astute recommendations regarding climate policy, which is reproduced in its entirety:

Four Fronts

“Scientists and policymakers must rethink their roles, objectives and approaches on four fronts.

Assess science in the near term. Policymakers should ask the IPCC for another special report, this time on the rates of climate change over the next 25 years. The panel should also look beyond the physical science itself and assess the speed at which political systems can respond, taking into account pressures to maintain the status quo from interest groups and bureaucrats. Researchers should improve climate models to describe the next 25 years in more detail, including the latest data on the state of the oceans and atmosphere, as well as natural cycles. They should do more to quantify the odds and impacts of extreme events. The evidence will be hard to muster, but it will be more useful in assessing real climate dangers and responses.

Rethink policy goals. Warming limits, such as the 1.5 °C goal, should be recognized as broad planning tools. Too often they are misconstrued as physical thresholds around which to design policies. The excessive reliance on ‘negative emissions technologies’ (that take up CO2) in the IPCC special report shows that it becomes harder to envision realistic policies the closer the world gets to such limits. It’s easy to bend models on paper, but much harder to implement real policies that work.

Realistic goals should be set based on political and social trade-offs, not just on geophysical parameters. They should come out of analyses of costs, benefits and feasibility. Assessments of these trade-offs must be embedded in the Paris climate process, which needs a stronger compass to guide its evaluations of how realistic policies affect emissions. Better assessment can motivate action but will also be politically controversial: it will highlight gaps between what countries say they will do to control emissions, and what needs to be achieved collectively to limit warming. Information about trade-offs must therefore come from outside the formal intergovernmental process — from national academies of sciences, subnational partnerships and non-governmental organizations.

Design strategies for adaptation. The time for rapid adaptation has arrived. Policymakers need two types of information from scientists to guide their responses. First, they need to know what the potential local impacts will be at the scales of counties to cities. Some of this information could be gleaned by combining fine-resolution climate impact assessments with artificial intelligence for ‘big data’ analyses of weather extremes, health, property damage and other variables. Second, policymakers need to understand uncertainties in the ranges of probable climate impacts and responses. Even regions that are proactive in setting adaptation policies, such as California, lack information about the ever-changing risks of extreme warming, fires and rising seas. Research must be integrated across fields and stakeholders — urban planners, public-health management, agriculture and ecosystem services. Adaptation strategies should be adjustable if impacts unfold differently. More planning and costing is needed around the worst-case outcomes.

Understand options for rapid response. Climate assessments must evaluate quick ways of lessening climate impacts, such as through reducing emissions of methane, soot (or black carbon) and HFCs. Per tonne, these three ‘super pollutants’ have 25 to thousands of times the impact of CO2. Their atmospheric lifetimes are short — in the range of weeks (for soot) to about a decade (for methane and HFCs). Slashing these pollutants would potentially halve the warming trend over the next 25 years.”

JC reflections

Although these recommendations come from a position of ‘alarm’, I agree with each of these recommendations, since each can be justified in terms of ‘no regrets’ actions.

I most particularly agree with the first recommendation on focusing on climate variability/change over the next 25 years.  This is the time scale that is of greatest relevance for city/regional planning and for industry/enterprise.  While recognizing the key importance of natural climate variability on this time scale, the authors miss what is likely to be the most significant event during this period: a transition to the cold phase of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation.

The second recommendation recognizes the farce of the current international policy on emissions reductions.

Adaptation makes a lot of sense, and the adaptation objectives are mostly the same whether the cause of the extreme events or trend is caused by humans or nature.

And finally, the climate rapid response plan.  I don’t know why this hasn’t received more traction, particularly related to soot.

Source: 
Judith Curry

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
WWI Hidden History 50
Grayzone Project 160
Pass Blue 204
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 14
John Pilger 416
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 2560
FEE 4554
Marine Le Pen 378
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 900
Mohamed Omar 370
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 40
Angry Foreigner 18
Fritte Fritzson 12
Teologiska rummet 32
Filosofiska rummet 106
Vetenskapsradion Historia 152
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 216
Les Crises 2781
Richard Falk 165
Ian Sinclair 106
SpinWatch 61
Counter Currents 9397
Kafila 469
Gail Malone 38
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 95
The Duran 9694
Vanessa Beeley 120
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 5625
Paul Craig Roberts 1802
News Junkie Post 58
Nomi Prins 27
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 4730
Sir Ken Robinson 24
Stephan Kinsella 97
Liberty Blitzkrieg 850
Sami Bedouin 64
Consortium News 2661
21 Century Wire 3522
Burning Blogger 324
Stephen Gowans 88
David D. Friedman 152
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1512
Tom Dispatch 522
Levant Report 18
The Saker 4293
The Barnes Review 526
John Friend 469
Psyche Truth 158
Jonathan Cook 145
New Eastern Outlook 3952
School Sucks Project 1775
Giza Death Star 1908
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 612
GMWatch 2291
Robert Faurisson 150
Espionage History Archive 34
Jay's Analysis 958
Le 4ème singe 90
Jacob Cohen 207
Agora Vox 15412
Cercle Des Volontaires 436
Panamza 2178
Fairewinds 117
Project Censored 944
Spy Culture 525
Conspiracy Archive 76
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 566
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 833
Independent Science News 80
The Anti Media 6656
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 292
The Mind renewed 441
Natural Society 2619
Yanis Varoufakis 999
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 114
Web of Debt 145
Porkins Policy Review 421
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 596
Libyan War Truth 335
DeadLine Live 1913
Kevin Ryan 63
BSNEWS 2079
Aaron Franz 232
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 121
Dr. Bruce Levine 145
Peter B Collins 1560
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 10742
Climate Audit 224
Donna Laframboise 436
Judith Curry 1129
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2382
Syria Report 78
Human Rights Investigation 91
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 11868
Laura Wells Solutions 44
Video Rebel's Blog 435
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 20403
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 3005
Northerntruthseeker 2375
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4711
AntiWar.com Blog 3066
AntiWar.com Original Content 6932
Corbett Report 2356
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1197
Webster Tarpley Website 1102

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public