WWF

A polar explorer is falsely described as a climate scientist in a news story; his activist connections aren't reported.

By Amy Dickens | Ecologist | September 23, 2015 In Paraguay’s vast Chaco region, the familiar sounds of the forest are being drowned out by the rumble of heavy machinery. “Where jaguars once trod, now there are just the tracks of bulldozers”, protests Porai Picanerai, a member of the Ayoreo tribe. His people are being chased […]

The copyrighted, registered trademarkof the World Wildlife Fund by Gaius PubliusIf you support the World Wildlife Fund (internationally named the "World Wide Fund for Nature"), consider stopping. They call this "greenwashing," something WWF is familiar with (see below).

Many of the scientists who signed an open letter against museums taking money from special interests are themselves linked to special interests. Part 3 of 3.

Governments fund solar capacity in countries that receive little sun and install wind turbines in nations that get little wind.

Environmental organizations are large, affluent, and secretive. Rather than being underdogs, they are now the establishment.

The IPCC acts as investigator, prosecutor, judge, and jury. It has a long history of recruiting activist personnel, and is led by a man prone to exaggeration.

Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, the marine biologist who led the IPCC's Ocean chapter, is a full-blown environmental activist. He recently wrote a politicized foreword to a WWF brochure, and has a long history of employment with both the WWF and Greenpeace.

Ontario energy minister says we should wear sweaters in winter.

Why doesn't the World Wildlife Fund argue for its vision based solely on that vision's merits?