waystation libertarians

“Libertarians” Who Object to “Self-Ownership”

Re this facebook post, where Cathy Reisenwitz writes “It’s telling that basically no academic libertarian philosophers try to ground libertarianism in NAP; using NAP to generate libertarianism is the hobby horse of philosophical amateurs. I think the reason for that is that academic philosophers recognize that using NAP to get to libertarianism begs the question […]

Libertarian Answer Man: Does It Matter How Law is Made?

From a libertarian colleague: What do you think about this proposition:  “It doesn’t matter how the law is made or who enforces it.  What matters is simply that the law is reasonably and fairly enforced and it is compatible with a reasonable interpretation of our principle.”  Isn’t this what we want? Walter Block was cc’d […]

KOL359 | State Constitutions vs. the Libertarian Private Law Code (PFS 2021)

Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 359. From the recently-concluded Fifteenth Annual (2021) Meeting of the PFS, Bodrum, Turkey (Sept. 16–21, 2021). For others, see the links in the Program, or the PFS YouTube channel, including the growing PFS 2021 YouTube Playlist. Additional media of the proceedings will be released presently. Also re-podcast at PFP231 | Stephan Kinsella, State Constitutions vs. […]

Creative Common Law Project, R.I.P. and Waystation Libertarians

A couple years ago, one Jamin Hübner, who had previously submitted an article to my journal Libertarian Papers, then later appeared on Tom Woods’s show, ep. 1214, to discuss his anarcho-capitalist based Creative Common Law Project. I thought it was interesting so emailed him comments and constructive criticism. He invited me to join the Advisory Board. I […]

Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics and Its Critics

I’ve written umpteen times on Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s groundbreaking “argumentation ethics” theory for libertarian rights, since 1994 or so. I still hear the same, tired old arguments and criticisms over and over. It’s amazing to me how cocksure some libertarians are, who have no theory of rights of their own, and many of them have no philosophical […]