Security, WORLD

NATO’s war preparations have become too large-scale and provocative and have turned Europe into a hotbed.

If there is a problem, Russia and Ukraine can solve it through negotiations. But neither the EU nor NATO has the idea of acting as a mediator to promote that process on its agenda.

The US is encouraging an arms race in the Asia Pacific region. It has adopted a policy of encirclement with its potential enemies in the crosshairs of its intermediate-range weapons.

The Western media is very busy nowadays circulating new fantasies about that perfidious Moscow having a finger in every pie. Now the EU has a new instrument in place to disseminate “chemical stories.”

There is no justification for using WP at the time ISIS has been reduced to insignificance in Syria but Washington did it again.

The never-ending and provocative exercises are needed to keep tensions high and justify the allocations of funds. This state of constant confrontation with Russia and China rakes in profits.

The NATO military alliance is preparing for war in the Arctic, and deliberately confronting Russia by conducting manoeuvres ever-closer to its borders. It had better be very careful.

Cyberspace becomes a war domain with an unfettered arms race pushing everyone to the brink of conflict. Russia has tried to avoid this scenario, but the US has made a different choice.

Evidently, Washington has made a decision to stay in Syria for a long time. It needs an alliance to support it militarily and diplomatically.

Russia’s victory in Syria is the only example of successful military operation achieved in a short period of time with positive results, paving the way for a negotiated solution.