libertarian

Porkins Policy Radio episode 162 JG Michael on the Evolution of the Right-Wing Movement: From Moldbug to Gavin McInnes

This week J.G. Michael of Parallax Views joined me to discuss the current state of the right-wing movement. J.G. started out by talking about the intellectual roots of the far right and how that has evolved over the years. He touched on lesser known but highly influential people like Curtis Yarvin and Hans-Hermann Hoppe. J.G. also talked about the role that silicon valley and tech culture within the neoreactionary movement.

Alex Jones & Libertarians Banned From Google, Facebook – Free Speech & Transhumanism! – Jay Dyer

The tech companies have moved to censor, as we predicted 4 years ago. Alex Jones and others have been banned from Google, Facebook and other platforms in an effort to not only chill the dissent, but to prepare for the full onslaught of transhumanism.
 
Purchase my book Here.

Member Login Here

No State Is Morally Fit to Spread Global “Freedom”

Philosopher Eric Mack [in his article “Permissible Defense,”] uses a device employed by all too many libertarians — of holding the ideal free-market anarchist system or a limited government as virtually equivalent to the current State-ridden system. Thus, he points out quite correctly that isolationism makes no sense as a principle for a free-market protective agency; he leaps from there to the conclusion that, at least for an anarchist, it cannot be a binding principle for the State either.

A White Supremacist Rapist and Pedophile Runs for Congress as A Libertarian and Conservative. Could He Be A Facade for Something Else?

Nathan Larson is running for Congress on a platform of less government, an end to wars in the Middle East, defense of the Second Amendment, and closing the borders. However, he also has a background of violence, rape, and pedophilia. His candidacy is ideal for collectivists who want to paint all who oppose them as despicable characters. Could it be that collectivists are his hidden sponsors and handlers? If so, this is a classic case of controlled opposition - which means action that appears to be opposition but really is designed to damage or destroy genuine opposition.