Idlib

3 groups of people disappointed that Russia hasn’t retaliated against US forces

1. The Russophobic Press 
The press who have spent years calling President Putin a dictator, a tyrant and a threat to world peace are very disappointed today. Their disappointment stems from the fact that Russia’s response to the illegal and unprovoked attack on Syria will be defensive measures that are legal and  and proportionate to the US instigated provocation.

Without Evidence, Trump Launches 59 Cruise Missiles, Destroying Syrian Air Force Base

Last night President Donald Trump caved into the Pentagon, the political left, the Neoconservative pro-war lobby and mainstream media pressure to act after the release of YouTube videos produced by the US and UK-funded NGO the White Helmets – of an alleged ‘chemical weapons’ attack by the Syrian Airforce in the al Qaeda

Boiler Room #104 – War Sells… But Who’s Buying

Tune in to the Alternate Current Radio Network (ACR) for another LIVE broadcast of ‘The Boiler Room’ tonight 6:00 PM PST | 8:00 PM CST | 9:00 PM EST for this special broadcast. Join us for uncensored, uninterruptible talk radio, custom-made for bar fly philosophers, misguided moralists, masochists, street corner evangelists, media-maniacs, savants, political animals and otherwise lovable rascals.

Rand Paul reminds Donald Trump of his anti-war message

Senator Rand Paul made his opposition to any would-be war on Syria abundantly clear in a manner that ought to resonate with President Trump.
The Senator from Kentucky and son of former Congressman Dr. Ron Paul, Tweeted Donald Trump’s erstwhile anti-war message back at him as a kind of friendly reminder of why people like me endorsed Trump in his election against the arch-war monger Hillary Clinton.

‘Beyond a Red Line’: Trump Might Just Launch Surprise Attack on Syria

Donald Trump addresses a joint session of Congress on Capitol Hill in Washington, Feb. 28, 2017. (Jim Lo Scalzo/AP)
Does President Donald Trump assume his administration can just launch a surprise, unilateral military attack against Syria?
“I’m not saying I’m doing anything one way or another, but I’m certainly not going to be telling you.” —President Donald Trump.

Was Hillary Clinton behind the transfer of chemical weapons used in Idlib, Syria?

Here is what we know:
1. The United States was quick to lay the blame for what is claimed to have been a chemical attack in a province of Idlib (Khan Shaykhun) under the control of Al Qaeda – ISIS.
2. In 2014, then President Barack Obama conceded that Assad destroyed all of Syria’s chemical stockpiles under the supervision of UN inspectors and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). The Americans even paid for the process of destroying those weapons.

MSNBC decides to support ISIS. Interviews 4 warmongers pushing for Trump to attack Syria (Video)

MSNBC went all in, supporting the “Assad chemical weapons” fake news story neatly packaged by the “moderate rebels” (aka Al Qaeda), the White Helmets (aka ISIS), and the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (a one man operation not even based in Syria, but the UK).
The Duran has already thoroughly debunked the entire Idlib chemical weapons story: