Guide to AR5

Credentialed, experienced critics declare that the UN's climate panel is politicized - and that many of its conclusions are mistaken.

Help annotate the new IPCC report so that it's more user friendly - and more informative about its authors and source material.

The IPCC acts as investigator, prosecutor, judge, and jury. It has a long history of recruiting activist personnel, and is led by a man prone to exaggeration.

Greenpeace isn't anti-establishment anymore. Now it's just another arm of the authoritarian, UN green machine.

In Berlin this week, environmental activists were allowed to attend a four-day meeting that journalists were denied access to. This is normal IPCC procedure.

Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, the marine biologist who led the IPCC's Ocean chapter, is a full-blown environmental activist. He recently wrote a politicized foreword to a WWF brochure, and has a long history of employment with both the WWF and Greenpeace.

In one chapter alone, IPCC personnel relied on unpublished studies 21 times to make their case.

Manipulation of a Summary document makes the UN's climate panel look like an overly-protective, hysterical mother.

How does the new climate report compare to the last one? Has the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change pulled up its socks?