Greenpeace

In Berlin this week, environmental activists were allowed to attend a four-day meeting that journalists were denied access to. This is normal IPCC procedure.

I’ll be in Germany and Scotland this month, giving speeches about the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. This Thursday, I’ll be addressing the International Conference on Climate and Energy, which is being held in Mannheim, Germany (info here). Also on the program: meteorologist Richard Lindzen, geologist Sebastian Lüning, astrophysicist Nir Shaviv, and solar physicist Henrik […]

According to leaks about the widely anticipated upcoming report by the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), which is due the first week of April, the scientific community is finally taking off the gloves and hitting the public smack dab between the eyes with the brutal truth.
Whereas in the past, IPCC reports were conservatively constructed and couched in scientific lingo that people found difficult to fully understand, this time it is different.

When did "Question Authority" stop being applicable?

If the public is to be represented at climate negotiations by someone other than their own government, it has a right to elect and dismiss those representatives.

Greenpeace makes a show of rejecting government and corporate money. But it's close pals with the WWF - which gets enormous funding from exactly those sources.

The WWF utilized UN press conference facilities yesterday. It's doing so again today.

Activist media events are a shockingly institutionalized part of UN climate negotiations.

If the UN were serious about a new climate treaty, it would turf the activists. They are a distraction no one needs.

Media outlets remain oblivious to the IPCC's tainted-by-activism personnel.