Iain Davis In Part 1 we questioned the fundamental principles said to underpin “the Climate Science™.” Specifically we considered the scientific validity of the claimed “consensus” and explored some of the many scientific doubts expressed about Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) theory and the so-called “greenhouse effect.” We noted the contradictory layman’s explanation of AGW theory offered by …
by Judith Curry
Last month at the University College London, atmospheric scientist Prof. Murry Salby, gave a presentation on man-made CO2 and its (lack of) impact on global climate.
by Judith Curry
Three new papers highlight how atmospheric radiative transfer, particularly how it is treated in climate models, is not ‘settled science.’
by Steven E. Koonin
My Wall Street Journal article of 9/20/14, Climate Science is Not Settled , contains the paragraph
by Judith Curry
Ferenc Miskolczi has published a new paper on the greenhouse effect that is generating substantial discussion.
